tieWaitForNote

Hello, Everything is correct except that the ties do not appear. What is my error? \version "2.18.2" \relative c'' { \clef treble \key e \minor \time 6/8 << {b8\rest s \set tieWaitForNote = ##t d,~ } \\ {\set tieWaitF

Re: tieWaitForNote

? Something like \relative c'' { \key e \minor \clef treble \time 6/8 \set tieWaitForNote = ##t g,8~ b~ d~ 4. } And then manipulate ties individually if needed? Hwaen Ch'uqi On 11/24/15, Mark Stephen Mrotek <carsonm...@ca.rr.com> wrote: > Hello, > > > > Everything is correct ex

RE: tieWaitForNote

r@gnu.org> Subject: Re: tieWaitForNote Greetings Mark, I believe that ties only work if the notes they are connecting are in the same voice. In your example, you have called \voiceOne, \voiceTwo, and \voiceThree. However, your resulting chord is in none of those voices. Would it be possib

Re: tieWaitForNote

d is the one for the rest because LilyPond cannot put a r8 and a g4. to the same stem (that’s what it tries if you use << >> without \\). \version "2.18.2" \relative c { \key e \minor \time 6/8 \set tieWaitForNote = ##t \tieDown << \new Voice { \

RE: tieWaitForNote

: tieWaitForNote Am 24.11.2015 um 06:53 schrieb Mark Stephen Mrotek: > Everything is correct except that the ties do not appear. What is my error? If you really want these note length values you need a << >> construct but without \\ because that would create new Voices. The only new

Re: Clashing ties & slurs with tieWaitForNote

Am 21.11.2015 um 20:30 schrieb David Kastrup: Urs Liska writes: Thanks, that makes things clearer. This is definitely what I suggested. The "outer" slur is not a tie but a phrasing slur and the inner one a slur indicating the bowing. That would not make much sense,

Re: Clashing ties & slurs with tieWaitForNote

> Werner, any suggestions for _not_ using a tie in that manner? For me, a tie lengthens a time value of a given pitch; it has no other meaning. Werner ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: Clashing ties & slurs with tieWaitForNote

Malte Meyn writes: > Am 21.11.2015 um 20:30 schrieb David Kastrup: >> Urs Liska writes: >> >>> Thanks, that makes things clearer. This is definitely what I >>> suggested. The "outer" slur is not a tie but a phrasing slur and the >>> inner one a slur

Re: Clashing ties & slurs with tieWaitForNote

Urs Liska writes: > Thanks, that makes things clearer. This is definitely what I > suggested. The "outer" slur is not a tie but a phrasing slur and the > inner one a slur indicating the bowing. That would not make much sense, really. Phrasing slurs in violin music are

Re: Clashing ties & slurs with tieWaitForNote

bin.com/5sfp1b/1 > > \score{ > { > \set tieWaitForNote = ##t > > c''2 \( ~ b'4 \) c''4 > c''2 ~ b'4 \( c''4 \) > } > > \layout{} > \midi{} > } > > > > > ___ > lilypond-user mailing li

Re: Clashing ties & slurs with tieWaitForNote

that something like this should most likely done with multiple voices (and LilyPond handles it much better anyway). If this *is* necessary, do you really have *that many* instances where a manual direction tweak is prohibitive, like the following: \score{ { \set tieWaitForNote = ##t c''2 _( ~ b'4 ) c''4

Re: Clashing ties & slurs with tieWaitForNote

{ >>> \voiceTwo >>> c''2 ( b'4 ) >>> } >>> >> >>> } >>> >>> >> +1! >> >> I've played songs on the piano that have this feel, but I agree that >> something like this should most likely done

Clashing ties & slurs with tieWaitForNote

Any thoughts on avoiding these clashes without having to manually tweak all the slurs? [image: Inline image 1] http://lilybin.com/5sfp1b/1 \score{ { \set tieWaitForNote = ##t c''2 \( ~ b'4 \) c''4 c''2 ~ b'4 \( c''4 \) } \layout{} \midi

Re: Clashing ties & slurs with tieWaitForNote

e piano that have this feel, but I agree that > something like this should most likely done with multiple voices (and > LilyPond handles it much better anyway). > > If this *is* necessary, do you really have *that many* instances where a > manual direction tweak is prohibitive, like the foll

Re: crossStaff with tieWaitForNote

\language english \layout { \context { \PianoStaff \consists #Span_stem_engraver tieWaitForNote = ##t } \context { \Voice \name SubVoice \remove Tie_engraver } \context { \name Voice \type Engraver_group \consists Tie_engraver \accepts SubVoice

Re: crossStaff with tieWaitForNote

#Span_stem_engraver tieWaitForNote = ##t } } } ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Re: crossStaff with tieWaitForNote

. I've no idea how to solve that quandary. Thanks for trying… =( How about this one? It's sort of fishy but seemingly does the trick in this simple case. \version 2.17 \language english \layout { \context { \PianoStaff \consists #Span_stem_engraver tieWaitForNote = ##t

Re: crossStaff with tieWaitForNote

Hi David, How about this one? Amazing! Thanks. It's sort of fishy What specifically is 'fishy' about it? but seemingly does the trick in this simple case. Definitely. I don't think any of the other cases in this score will be any different — if I run into any thing that your fishing

crossStaff with tieWaitForNote

tieWaitForNote = ##t } } upper_notes = \relative d'' { { \voiceOne r8 d e8[-. a'-. e']-. a2-. } \new Voice { \voiceTwo s8 \crossStaff { b,,, c e fs b2.. } } } lower_notes = \relative d, { \clef bass \tuplet 7/4 { \stemUp d32[ ~ a' ~ fs' ~ \change Staff = piano_upper \voiceTwo b c

Re: crossStaff with tieWaitForNote

{ \context { \PianoStaff \consists #Span_stem_engraver tieWaitForNote = ##t } } upper_notes = \relative d'' { { \voiceOne r8 d e8[-. a'-. e']-. a2-. } \new Voice { \voiceTwo s8 \crossStaff { b,,, c e fs b2.. } } } lower_notes = \relative d, { \clef bass

Re: tieWaitForNote across staves

--- On Mon, 9/7/09, Robin Bannister r...@dataway.ch wrote: From: Robin Bannister r...@dataway.ch Subject: Re: tieWaitForNote across staves To: Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com, lilypond-user lilypond-user@gnu.org Date: Monday, September 7, 2009, 1:02 AM Jonathan Wilkes wrote:    I

Re: tieWaitForNote across staves

Jonathan Wilkes wrote: I tried fooling around with tieWaitForNote You didn't show your code, so it's not easy to guess what you tried. I have no cross-staff experience, but it looks to me like the cross-staff run is a lot better supported than the cross-staff chord (where you have

Re: tieWaitForNote across staves

--- On Sun, 9/6/09, Robin Bannister r...@dataway.ch wrote: From: Robin Bannister r...@dataway.ch Subject: Re: tieWaitForNote across staves To: Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com, lilypond-user lilypond-user@gnu.org Date: Sunday, September 6, 2009, 6:28 PM Jonathan Wilkes wrote:  I

Re: tieWaitForNote across staves

normally want to avoid staff collisions). I see a cross-staff property for grobs, but it's internal. Any advice? -Jonathan \version 2.12.2 \score { \new Staff = RH { \relative c' { s4 % \set tieWaitForNote = ##t \stemUp dis gis c 8

Re: tieWaitForNote across staves

Jonathan Wilkes wrote: I see a cross-staff property for grobs But this doesn't mean that every sort of grob has it, or uses it. The file define-grob-properties.scm lists about a dozen grobs which do: Beam, Stem, Slur, TupletBracket, among others, but not TieColumn. So your TieColumn

tieWaitForNote across staves

Hello, Is there a way to get the attached notation in Lilypond? I tried fooling around with tieWaitForNote but it seems the ties set in the rh keeping on waiting, and waiting, and waiting... Any help is appreciated. Thanks, Jonathan attachment: cross-staff

Re: help with tieWaitForNote

Richard Wattenbarger wrote: the d-flat tie doesn't render in the upper voice When you ask for tieWaitForNote like this, it gets turned on for the voice and doesn't affect any other voices, e.g. a voice for the right hand. The {} // {} construct needs two voices and sets up its own

help with tieWaitForNote

\key aes \major \relative c, { \set tieWaitForNote = ##t \slurUp %this works fine r16 es~ (bes'~ g'~) es, bes' g'4 r16 fes

\tieWaitForNote in \grace music

to either use a \new Voice or put some of the notes in another line (which also doesn't work.)Any suggestions?Thanks,Vivian.%% This doesn't work.\grace{\set tieWaitForNote = ##t\stemDown \tieUp f'''16~[ \tieDown e~ b~ \change Staff = "lh" \stemUp \tieUp bes,,,~ \tieDown d,~]}\new Voice {\tieNeut

2.8.1 bug in tieWaitForNote

tieWaitForNote bug LilyPond 2.8.1 installed with GUB on Debian Linux Using \set tieWaitForNote, which allows for ties between arpeggios and a following chord, some ties are not attached to or do not extend to the correct note. --- begin LilyPond code --- version 2.8.1 \layout { ragged-right

Tie anomaly in \set tieWaitForNote

Tie Anomaly LilyPond 2.8.0 on Debian Linux, installed using the GUB There seems to be an anomaly with ties when using the \set tieWaitForNote feature, in version 2.8.0. I noticed this anomaly when I was trying to manually format a tie column between a grace-note arpeggio and the following chord

Re: tieWaitForNote

On 12-Sep-05, at 9:42 PM, Martin Bergande wrote: using LilyPond 2.4.4 I tried to \set tieWaitForNote = ##t but the program seems not know this command and supposes typing errors. Can anybody give me a hint how to solve this problem? Are you sure that tieWaitForNote exists in 2.4.4

Re: tieWaitForNote

Betreff: Re: tieWaitForNote Datum: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 22:56:59 -0700 On 12-Sep-05, at 9:42 PM, Martin Bergande wrote: using LilyPond 2.4.4 I tried to \set tieWaitForNote = ##t but the program seems not know this command and supposes typing errors. Can anybody give me a hint how to solve

Re: tieWaitForNote

--- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --- Von: Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED] An: Martin Bergande [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kopie: lilypond-user@gnu.org Betreff: Re: tieWaitForNote Datum: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 22:56:59 -0700 On 12-Sep-05, at 9:42 PM, Martin Bergande wrote: using LilyPond 2.4.4 I tried to \set

tieWaitForNote

Dear all, using LilyPond 2.4.4 I tried to \set tieWaitForNote = ##t but the program seems not know this command and supposes typing errors. Can anybody give me a hint how to solve this problem? Thanks for answering in advance, Martin -- GMX DSL = Maximale Leistung zum minimalen Preis! 2000 MB

Re: set tieWaitForNote

I'm using windows ME, and have still made no headway with \set tieWaitForNote. Sacha - Original Message - From: Graham Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Sacha Standen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 6:11 AM Subject: Re: set tieWaitForNote What OS

set tieWaitForNote

I'm having problems on version 2.4.3 and on version 2.5.29 with the command: \set tieWaitForNote. I've tried various syntax and have tried entering the example given in the manual (5.1.12), but the final note of the arpeggio is always the only one to be tied. This is the text

Re: set tieWaitForNote

What OS and package type are you using? I just tried it on 2.5.30 compiled on OSX, and I get all the ties. Cheers, - Graham On 14-Jun-05, at 9:52 AM, Sacha Standen wrote:     I'm having problems on version 2.4.3 and on version 2.5.29 with the command: \set tieWaitForNote. I've tried various