This is for powertop to run better on kernel. the first patch is back port from
8d4b9d1bf on 2.6.36.
They have been tested on freescale's babage 3.0 board.
Yong
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
From: Arjan van de Ven ar...@linux.intel.com
In order for PowerTOP to be able to report how well the new runtime PM is
working for the various drivers, the kernel needs to export some basic
statistics in sysfs.
This patch adds two sysfs files in the runtime PM domain that expose the
total time a
Bryan,
In general, I'd say yes they'd work with OMAP4 too.
As soon as TI turns on cpufreq/cpuidle config options for OMAP4, it should
all work since the patch to allow it to work on ARM is now upstream.
However, we haven't tested since we have no OMAP4 HW.
/Amit
On 10 Sep 13, Bryan Wu wrote:
On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 10:50 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
If the separate lexbuilder backend deployment causes any issues we can
also just hook this up to live-helper so we produce the hwpacks in the
headless run.
No, this shouldn't be the case. Do it right the first time, and have a
longer
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Scott Bambrough
scott.bambro...@linaro.org wrote:
On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 10:50 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
If the separate lexbuilder backend deployment causes any issues we can
also just hook this up to live-helper so we produce the hwpacks in the
headless
awesome news ...
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Alexandros Frantzis
alexandros.frant...@linaro.org wrote:
1. debian/patches/remove_cogl_gl_types.patch:
This, of course, breaks some applications (clutk, mutter, gnome-shell to
name a few) but the fix is trivial (just a correct GL header
On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 11:56 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Scott Bambrough
scott.bambro...@linaro.org wrote:
On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 10:50 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
If the separate lexbuilder backend deployment causes any issues we can
also just hook this
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Scott Bambrough
scott.bambro...@linaro.org wrote:
On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 11:56 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Scott Bambrough
scott.bambro...@linaro.org wrote:
On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 10:50 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
If the
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 4:03 PM, James Westby
james.wes...@canonical.com wrote:
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 10:50:29 +0200, Alexander Sack a...@linaro.org wrote:
You can see the hwpacks at
http://jameswestby.net:8080/view/Hardware%20Packs/
awesome ... i will check those a bit later.
Unfortunately
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 4:03 PM, James Westby
james.wes...@canonical.com wrote:
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 12:35:05 +0200, Alexander Sack a...@linaro.org wrote:
headless is already available and can already be used for testing
(even if omap3 is in there atm). The other heads are failing to build
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 17:03:16 +0200, Alexander Sack a...@linaro.org wrote:
Sure: with this change we can produce our images without any kernel
whatsoever (e.g. as those are coming from hwpacks).
Ok, we're back to this again. I still haven't heard any convincing
arguments for why that is a good
Hi Peter,
Are you past this? If not it might be easier to give me a call. If you
miss a response from me its best to also copy my r-woodru...@ti.com email
address (given my environment setup few mails age there much).
Where are you at in the world? I can verbally explain via phone more
12 matches
Mail list logo
