Time to leave 2.6.38 behind and move on! We now have a 2.6.39 based
Linaro kernel which can be viewed here:
http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=kernel/linux-linaro-2.6.39.git;a=summary
or cloned from either of those:
git://git.linaro.org/kernel/linux-linaro-2.6.39.git
http://git.linaro.org/g
Hi Chander,
Le 26/05/2011 13:10, Chander Kashyap a écrit :
Modifies CPU Frequency to 1GHz and removes hard coding of mmc_pre_ratio for
MMC Channel2 in FSYS2 register.
Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap
---
board/samsung/smdkv310/lowlevel_init.S |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 de
On 6/1/2011 1:48 AM, Per Forlin wrote:
> From: Per Forlin
> diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/card.h b/include/linux/mmc/card.h
> index 7b4fd7b..852021c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmc/card.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmc/card.h
> @@ -175,6 +175,7 @@ struct mmc_card {
> #define MMC_QUIRK_DISABLE_CD (1
Memory Management Mini-Summit
Linaro Developer Summit, Budapest, May 9-11, 2011
=
Hi all. Apologies for this report being so long in coming. I know
others have thrown in their perceptions and opinions on how the
mini-summit went, so I suppose it's
+++ Dave Martin [2011-06-01 15:56 +0100]:
> Separate question how big is Debian-installer, in terms of filesystem
> and RAM footprint?
There are various flavours. Primarily:
1) a 'full' image which is 160MB and includes the base system that is
installed (so you can get a system without network
On Wed, 1 Jun 2011 13:17:38 -0700, Deepak Saxena wrote:
> No, not a tree of packaged kernels. I meant a single git tree that
> consolidates all
> the kernel source trees that we possibly build from to provide a
> single location
> where developers can grab any kernel we've used for builds. This wo
Speaking about Ubuntu packaged kernels only...
Everything that goes into the source package is in git.
Every release has a signed tag.
Ubuntu kernel package names have a strict naming convention that makes
upgrading and abi checking work right, so from my perspective putting
the tag name somewhere
Steve,
thanks, have a poke around and tell me / OCTO what it means to join
in, what the costs and benefits are etc...
Dave
On 06/01/11 22:36, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 07:32:18AM +0900, David Rusling wrote:
On 06/01/11 01:22, Wookey wrote:
As this is a non-trivial a
> Zach suggested SPDX (as in spdx.org) as a solution to this problem; I'm
> not sure I understand enough about it (Loïc's provided a sample file at
> http://spdx.org/wiki/sample-partial-spdx-file-geronimo) but here's my
> strawman proposal of what data we should give people quick access to:
>
>
W dniu 01.06.2011 20:41, Christian Robottom Reis pisze:
Hello there,
This week I initiated a confused conversation during the techleads
call about having a way to describe what the hardware pack was built
from. We had a couple of false starts but I think we agreeing that there
needs to be s
On 1 June 2011 12:58, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 12:51:12PM -0700, Deepak Saxena wrote:
>> All official Linaro builds are generated from a single git tree that
>> has branches for different kernel versions that we build from being
>> automatically updated during the b
On Wed, 1 Jun 2011 15:41:05 -0300, Christian Robottom Reis
wrote:
> This week I initiated a confused conversation during the techleads
> call about having a way to describe what the hardware pack was built
> from. We had a couple of false starts but I think we agreeing that there
> needs to b
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 12:51:12PM -0700, Deepak Saxena wrote:
> All official Linaro builds are generated from a single git tree that
> has branches for different kernel versions that we build from being
> automatically updated during the build process. The git rev is
> embedded in the kernel packa
On 1 June 2011 11:41, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> I seem to be hung up on having a way of saying "this hardware pack's
> kernel was built from this git tree with this config", so I wanted to
> explore the use cases a bit more:
>
> - My #1 use case is, once I've installed a hardware pack, r
Hello there,
This week I initiated a confused conversation during the techleads
call about having a way to describe what the hardware pack was built
from. We had a couple of false starts but I think we agreeing that there
needs to be some form of manifest that describes what the hardware pack
On Wednesday 01 June 2011 16:56:07 Dave Martin wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 03:36:47PM +0100, Wookey wrote:
> > +++ Arnd Bergmann [2011-06-01 16:11 +0200]:
> > > On Wednesday 01 June 2011, Wookey wrote:
> >
> > > I absolutely agree that we should consequently think beyond image
> > > generatio
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 01 2011, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>> This patchset adds a quirk to support this spurious IRQ issue and also report
>> a warning if an SDIO interrupt is raised but none CCCR_INTx bits are set.
>
> Given that the issue can be fixed locally to the libertas driver, I'd
> suggest not mergi
Hi there Eric,
I have some results now from trying a Thumb-2 kernel on our various
trees for imx:
* It "works" on the packaged 2.6.38 kernel tree (linux-linaro-natty),
but I can't test things the kernel doesn't support (like power
management).
[ John, is it worth trying to turn this on fo
On Wed, 1 Jun 2011, Per Forlin wrote:
> From: Per Forlin
>
> Daniel Drake reported an issue in the libertas sdio client that was
> triggered by the sdio_single_irq functionality. His SDIO device seems to
> raise an interrupt even though there are no bits set in the CCCR_INTx
> register. This beh
On Wed, 1 Jun 2011, Ricardo Salveti wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
> > Hi there John,
> >
> > I've tested the linux-linaro-natty tree with CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL on
> > vexpress, and it seems to work well.
> >
> > Since we have reasonable confidence in the status of vex
At the risk of overstating the obvious, there are also ABI guarantees
at stake here, which in my mind are architecture agnostic. OpenGL
applications need to know which bits (API functions) of which core
versions can be expected to be resolved during load time and which
must be queried through GetP
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Wookey wrote:
>
>> In my experience anyone distributing binaries actually picks a small
>> set of distros and builds for those explicitly, rather than relying
>> on the LSB. Does that mean that
This makes a lot of sense with respect to the discussion we had at the
graphics working group meeting this morning around component releases;
more to the point, exactly how each component gets tested, packaged
(and/or tar'd) and pushed out to some publicly visible repository.
The idea of letting so
On 06/01/2011 07:25 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
so in _that_ regard, the question becomes: "are the efforts of the
free software community better off being spent elsewhere"? and "what
benefit is there *TO THE FREE SOFTWARE COMMUNITY* of doing LSB for
ARM"? forget the proprietary j
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 03:36:47PM +0100, Wookey wrote:
> +++ Arnd Bergmann [2011-06-01 16:11 +0200]:
> > On Wednesday 01 June 2011, Wookey wrote:
>
> > I absolutely agree that we should consequently think beyond image
> > generation, but that doesn't necessarily mean that a CD image
> > to perfor
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 09:35:36AM -0300, Ricardo Salveti wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
> > Hi there John,
> >
> > I've tested the linux-linaro-natty tree with CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL on
> > vexpress, and it seems to work well.
> >
> > Since we have reasonable confidence
+++ Arnd Bergmann [2011-06-01 16:11 +0200]:
> On Wednesday 01 June 2011, Wookey wrote:
> I absolutely agree that we should consequently think beyond image
> generation, but that doesn't necessarily mean that a CD image
> to perform an unattended installation is a better answer.
>
> My main questi
On Tue, 31 May 2011, Per Forlin wrote:
> Return error in case of pending IRQ but none functions bits
> in CCCR_INTx is set.
>
> Signed-off-by: Per Forlin
> ---
> drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c |5 +
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_
On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 16:03 +0100, David Gilbert wrote:
> On 31 May 2011 15:35, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> > I think the difficulty here is that glibc expects either the compiler,
> > or libgcc to provide the sync primitives; and while GCC can tie the
> > inlined copy of the primitive to use of CP
On Tue, 31 May 2011, Daniel Drake wrote:
> On 31 May 2011 21:33, Per Forlin wrote:
> > Daniel Drake reported an issue in the libertas sdio client that was
> > triggered by the sdio_single_irq functionality. His SDIO device seems to
> > raise an interrupt even though there are no bits set in the C
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 07:32:18AM +0900, David Rusling wrote:
>On 06/01/11 01:22, Wookey wrote:
>
>>As this is a non-trivial amount of work, the question then arises,
>>does anyone care about this enough to actually do the work? Linaro is
>>an obvious organisation that could expend some engineerin
On Wednesday 01 June 2011, Wookey wrote:
> Pre-built images comes from an 'embedded systems' view of the world.
> Real computers can run installers to put their operating systems on
> and set themselves up, and we should be taking advantage of that. ARM
> computers are real computers now and we sho
There has been quite a lot of discussion of image creation, how many
flavours there should be, where we store them and for how long, how
they get generated and delivered etc. And there were many sessions at
UDS as well as a couple of threads on this list covering this.
All this discussion left me
Hi folks,
There is a significant number of patches sent to devicetree-discuss that
were CCed to patc...@linaro.org and thus will be counted when generating
our patch stats. However, if this is just a mailing list for discussion
and the patches are actually being sent to the lkml (or other ML like
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Dave Martin wrote:
> Hi there John,
>
> I've tested the linux-linaro-natty tree with CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL on
> vexpress, and it seems to work well.
>
> Since we have reasonable confidence in the status of vexpress for
> Thumb-2 anyway, the start of this cycle seems
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 02:46:05PM +0530, Avik Sil wrote:
> Hi,
>
> SMARTT (System Metrics - Annotation Recording and Tracing Tool) is a
> tool to capture and display system metrics data from the system. It's
> mainly targeted for system metrics that are interesting for Graphics and
> Multimedia W
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Wookey wrote:
> In my experience anyone distributing binaries actually picks a small
> set of distros and builds for those explicitly, rather than relying
> on the LSB. Does that mean that it's not actually useful in the real
> world? I guess in a sense this posti
See https://wiki.linaro.org/OfficeofCTO/Status/2011-05-31 for relevant
links.
== Key Points for wider discussion ==
* Any tool related to tracking work progress during a development
cycle should be sufficiently integrated to our requirements and issue
management tool (Launchpad) - otherwise th
I am out of the office until 15/06/2011.
I am on vacation and will not be reachable by mail or phone.
Note: This is an automated response to your message "Does anyone care
about LSB on arm?" sent on 31/5/11 21:52:39.
This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away.
Hi,
Linaro Developer Platform team organises every week (Wednesday 14:00 -
18:00 UTC) an ARM porting Jam. The idea is to gather all developers together to
fix userspace portability issues across the board. The list of bugs
being worked on
is at launchpad:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?f
Hi there John,
I've tested the linux-linaro-natty tree with CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL on
vexpress, and it seems to work well.
Since we have reasonable confidence in the status of vexpress for
Thumb-2 anyway, the start of this cycle seems a good opportunity to
switch to Thumb-2 for this platform.
Whic
Folks
I recently came up with a list of ideas proposed for the problem of the
development cycle. I put those in the wiki, however it soon dawned on me
that others would need to actually edit the wiki in order to give
feedback. Each user could add some comment or +1 or something like that.
Altogeth
On 26 May 2011 20:10, Chander Kashyap wrote:
> Modifies CPU Frequency to 1GHz and removes hard coding of mmc_pre_ratio for
> MMC Channel2 in FSYS2 register.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap
> ---
> board/samsung/smdkv310/lowlevel_init.S | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deleti
Hi,
SMARTT (System Metrics - Annotation Recording and Tracing Tool) is a
tool to capture and display system metrics data from the system. It's
mainly targeted for system metrics that are interesting for Graphics and
Multimedia WG for measuring and analyzing performance of their
tools/applications.
On 06/01/2011 09:59 AM, Paul Larson wrote:
I have a board at home I can try to reproduce with if someone on the pm team
doesn't. I probably won't be able to get to it until later in the week
though.
Ok, thanks very much. I will discuss with the PM team and I will try to
get a beagleboardXM.
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Daniel Lezcano
wrote:
> On 05/31/2011 08:48 PM, Paul Larson wrote:
>>
>> Since there is no lp project (that I am aware of) for the pmqa tests, I
>> think I just reported it to Amit directly at the time. Iirc, he said to
>> follow up on it when he had someone workin
On 1 June 2011 10:20, Dave Pigott wrote:
>
> On 1 Jun 2011, at 08:59, Zygmunt Krynicki wrote:
>
> > W dniu 01.06.2011 09:56, Paul Larson pisze:
> >> Any good suggestions for a new name for abrek? I don't want to encourage
> >> bike shedding on this, so unless someone has a much better suggestion,
From: Per Forlin
Return error in case of pending IRQ but none functions bits
in CCCR_INTx are set.
Signed-off-by: Per Forlin
---
drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c |5 +
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_irq.c
in
From: Per Forlin
Add quirk MMC_QUIRK_SDIO_IRQ_CCCR_INTX_0 to handle SDIO device that may
have pending IRQ when none bits are set in CCCR_INTx.
This IRQ issue was identified in the libertas sdio driver where the
SDIO device seems to raise an interrupt even if there were none function
bits in CCCR
From: Per Forlin
Daniel Drake reported an issue in the libertas sdio client that was
triggered by the sdio_single_irq functionality. His SDIO device seems to
raise an interrupt even though there are no bits set in the CCCR_INTx
register. This behaviour is not supported by the sdio_single_irq feat
On Wednesday 01 June 2011, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> The eventual goal is to to run the same kernel across all the boards
> with an Android version of the 'hwpack' enabling all of the great
> features these boards have to offer: GFX, video, audio, Bluetooth,
> etc. I think this is doable.
I would set
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:53:35PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Tue, 31 May 2011, Dave Martin wrote:
>
> > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 03:35:42PM +0100, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> > > I think the difficulty here is that glibc expects either the compiler,
> > > or libgcc to provide the sync primitiv
On 1 Jun 2011, at 08:59, Zygmunt Krynicki wrote:
> W dniu 01.06.2011 09:56, Paul Larson pisze:
>> Any good suggestions for a new name for abrek? I don't want to encourage
>> bike shedding on this, so unless someone has a much better suggestion, I
>> would suggest we just go with lava-test (skip t
I have a board at home I can try to reproduce with if someone on the pm team
doesn't. I probably won't be able to get to it until later in the week
though.
Thanks,
Paul Larson
On May 31, 2011 5:38 PM, "Daniel Lezcano" wrote:
> On 05/31/2011 08:48 PM, Paul Larson wrote:
>> Since there is no lp pr
W dniu 01.06.2011 09:56, Paul Larson pisze:
Any good suggestions for a new name for abrek? I don't want to encourage
bike shedding on this, so unless someone has a much better suggestion, I
would suggest we just go with lava-test (skip the -tool) and be done with
it.
I like lava-test (despite n
Any good suggestions for a new name for abrek? I don't want to encourage
bike shedding on this, so unless someone has a much better suggestion, I
would suggest we just go with lava-test (skip the -tool) and be done with
it.
Thanks,
Paul Larson
On May 31, 2011 7:55 PM, "Michael Hudson-Doyle"
wrote
On 1 June 2011 09:30, Linus Walleij wrote:
> 2011/5/31 Per Forlin :
>
>> +/**
>> + * sdio_single_irq_enable - enable or disable SDIO single IRQ function
>> + * @card: card to enable SDIO single irq
>> + * @value: true to enable SDIO single irq function, false to disable
>> + *
>> + *
2011/5/31 Per Forlin :
> +/**
> + * sdio_single_irq_enable - enable or disable SDIO single IRQ function
> + * @card: card to enable SDIO single irq
> + * @value: true to enable SDIO single irq function, false to disable
> + *
> + * If there is only 1 function interrupt registered a
58 matches
Mail list logo
