On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Christian Robottom Reis
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 03:20:17PM +0100, Frederik Lotter wrote:
>> I am using 32-bit Ubuntu 11.04. Just here in my office everyone is
>> running into the same issue. We are all Ubuntu users (11.04) and both
>> 32-bit and 64-bit mac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/18/2011 12:49 AM, Paul Larson wrote:
> Ok, I sorted this out, but I noticed a couple of problems still. 1.
> even with the -k, it errors out after a while
If one test fail, that will make the tests suite to return an
error at the end. Could it
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 02:11:34PM -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> As far as Linaro Nexus builds. We can help out, but we'll need to come
> up with a plan to staff it. I'll let Kiko and asac chime in on Linaro
> doing Nexus S, Nexus One, or Xoom builds.
I think we need to get hold of some hardware to
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 03:20:17PM +0100, Frederik Lotter wrote:
> I am using 32-bit Ubuntu 11.04. Just here in my office everyone is
> running into the same issue. We are all Ubuntu users (11.04) and both
> 32-bit and 64-bit machines.
Hey Frederik,
Did you figure out what the issue was?
--
Ok, I sorted this out, but I noticed a couple of problems still.
1. even with the -k, it errors out after a while
2. There are still some test results with duplicate test_case_id:
cpufreq_05.0/cpu1: checking 'ondemand' directory exists...
pass
cpufreq_05.0/cpu1: checking 'conservative' directory e
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:12 PM, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>> Nicolas,
>>
>> Thanks for the notes. As you say there are many, many things that can
>> affect this demo. What notes like this really underscore is the
>> importance of staying up-to-dat
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Tony Mansson wrote:
> -O3 for gcc 4.6 works.
Cool. What does 'works' mean and where is it written up? Is this
with -mfpu=neon as well?
-- Michael
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.l
Key Points for wider discussion
===
Move to Android 2.3.5 is done and being tested.
Toolchain with OpenMP, loop parallelization support is done and being tested.
ffmpeg with support for H.264 and WebM runs on Linaro Android.
Team Highlights
===
Snowball ru
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Daniel Lezcano
wrote:
> The main window creation is misplaced in the loop, it is created several
> times.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
ACK.
> ---
> display.c | 10 --
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/display.c
On 17 August 2011 06:05, Bernhard Rosenkranzer
wrote:
> On 17/08/2011, Chao Yang wrote:
>> Hi Bernhard,
>>
>> Well, I personally think so. Are we supposed to stop supporting 2.3.4 after
>> we release 2.3.5 and move all the activities to 2.3.5? Thanks.
>
> I think so - I think the idea is to alway
Hello Christian,
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 08:40:09 -0300
Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 12:16:36PM +0300, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
> > On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 11:00:32 +0200
> > Patrik Ryd wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Linaro Android has now moved up to 2.3.5.
> > >
> > > T
Sure. I didn't list it because Android doesn't really support generic
USB (it will in Ice Cream Sandwich through a new USB device layer)
Alexander,
Would you add:
* USB
* Keyboard
* Mouse
On 17 August 2011 01:46, David Gilbert wrote:
> On 16 August 2011 23:09, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>>
Here's the general info I got from the Linux Foundation:
Can't make it to Vancouver this week for LinuxCon, the leading
technical conference for All Matters Linux? You can still take
advantage of the amazing content this event has to offer.
Live video streaming will be available for all of our ke
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011, Dave Martin wrote:
> Acked-by = This patch is definitely right, or I fully agree with the
> patch and trust the author's judgement ("I will share
> responsibility for the correctness and appropriateness of this
> patch"). This implies Reviewed-by.
> No
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/17/2011 06:55 PM, Paul Larson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Daniel Lezcano
> wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 08/17/2011 04:57 PM, Paul Larson wrote:
>>> Hi, I haven't had a chance to look at it
On 17 August 2011 04:12, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>> Nicolas,
>>
>> Thanks for the notes. As you say there are many, many things that can
>> affect this demo. What notes like this really underscore is the
>> importance of staying up-to-date. This d
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Daniel Lezcano
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 08/17/2011 04:57 PM, Paul Larson wrote:
> > Hi, I haven't had a chance to look at it more in depth yet, but a couple
> of
> > problems when I tried running it on my system (just my lapt
Colin,
On Friday 22 July 2011 10:51 AM, Colin Cross wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Santosh Shilimkar
[]
For my OMAP4 PM rebasing, for time-being I will go with exported
GIC functions so that I don't have too many redundancies with GIC
save/restore code.
I think you should try
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/17/2011 04:57 PM, Paul Larson wrote:
> Hi, I haven't had a chance to look at it more in depth yet, but a couple of
> problems when I tried running it on my system (just my laptop for now,
> haven't tried on any board yet)
Ok, thanks for looking
The Engineering Resources team is trying to solicit feedback from the
community. Our goal is to make it as easy as possible for you to get
your job done. With that in mind, we'd like to check in with you and get
your thoughts on what hasn't worked well for you.
This is intended to be an open-ended
Hi, I haven't had a chance to look at it more in depth yet, but a couple of
problems when I tried running it on my system (just my laptop for now,
haven't tried on any board yet)
1. no results were parsed
2. ### cpufreq_09:
### test the load of the cpu does not affect the frequency with 'powersav
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 12:16:36PM +0300, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
> > On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 11:00:32 +0200
> > Patrik Ryd wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Linaro Android has now moved up to 2.3.5.
> > >
> > > The daily builds (https:/
On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 11:48 +0100, James Tunnicliffe wrote:
> This is odd. When I performed tests btrfs and ext4 were both about the
> same speed for copying a mixture of large and small files to. I was
> testing them using my laptop card reader though. Tixy: Do you get
> similar btrfs vs ext4 resu
On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 13:11 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 August 2011, James Tunnicliffe wrote:
> > One thing I noticed during Ubuntu boot on my Panda was that the mount
> > process would say that it detected btrfs was running on a flash card
> > and it had enabled flash mode. I don
The main window creation is misplaced in the loop, it is created several times.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
---
display.c | 10 --
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/display.c b/display.c
index ebc4de6..28c47f3 100644
--- a/display.c
+++ b/display.c
@@ -54
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 03:13:10PM -0300, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 05:19:30PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> > Can anyone see a reason not to make this change? On a couple of
> > occasions I've had people come to me with problems after failing to do
> > apt-get update
On Wednesday 17 August 2011, Yasushi SHOJI wrote:
> >
> > The version of btrfs that I'm looking at does not have any optimization
> > for cheap flash drives, only for SSD.
>
> does anyone checked on seekwatcher[1], a visualizing tool Chris Mason
> has wrote. I'm pretty sure that Chris would like
On Wednesday 17 August 2011, Tixy wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 13:11 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 17 August 2011, James Tunnicliffe wrote:
> > > One thing I noticed during Ubuntu boot on my Panda was that the mount
> > > process would say that it detected btrfs was running on a fl
Guys,
The patch below fixed the recent ethernet not working issue due to absence
of MAC address. It's Acked-by the original guilty commit author, please
consider merging into next release of u-boot.
The real problem, however, is that kernel ethernet driver has an incorrect
assumption on a correct
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 12:16:36PM +0300, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 11:00:32 +0200
> Patrik Ryd wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Linaro Android has now moved up to 2.3.5.
> >
> > The daily builds (https://android-build.linaro.org/index) are now
> > based on the linaro_android_2.3.5 b
At Wed, 17 Aug 2011 13:11:51 +0200,
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> On Wednesday 17 August 2011, James Tunnicliffe wrote:
> > One thing I noticed during Ubuntu boot on my Panda was that the mount
> > process would say that it detected btrfs was running on a flash card
> > and it had enabled flash mode. I
Dear ARM fans,
Linaro Developer Platform team organises every week (Wednesday 14:00 -
18:00 UTC) an ARM porting Jam. The idea is to gather all developers together to
fix userspace portability issues across the board. The list of bugs
being worked on
is at launchpad:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubu
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> Nicolas,
>
> Thanks for the notes. As you say there are many, many things that can
> affect this demo. What notes like this really underscore is the
> importance of staying up-to-date. This demo is more about the
> macroscopic effects from tip
On Wednesday 17 August 2011, James Tunnicliffe wrote:
> > m s
> > ext4 3:30
> > ext3 8:30
> > ext2 5:00
> > btrfs 13:40
> > nilfs 10:40
> > logfs 10:00
> >
> > this is using default mount options for file system but with noatime.
> >
> > These timings also bear out prelim
Hi,
next build (identical to the first one, except it has the new gcc from
the toolchain WG) is ready.
https://android-build.linaro.org/builds/~linaro-android/toolchain-4.6-2011.08/#build=5
Please give it some testing; so far it hasn't had any (I'm about to
start an iMX53 build using it though).
T
On 17 August 2011 08:55, Tixy wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 00:13 -0300, Ricardo Salveti wrote:
>> Yeah, if we're doing this change it seems it would make more sense to
>> jump directly to the btrfs, unless we can demonstrate that the
>> performance is not that superior and have any kind of block
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 05:43:08PM +0100, Tixy wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 17:06 +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Tixy wrote:
[...]
> I've been re-reading Documentation/SubmittingPatches to try and work out
> when it's appropriate to use Acked-by, but it seems a
On 12 August 2011 17:49, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 11:43:35PM +0200, Per Forlin wrote:
>> > FSG_NUM_BUFFERS is set to 2 as default.
>> > Usually 2 buffers are enough to establish a good buffering pipeline.
>> > The number may be incre
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 11:00:32 +0200
Patrik Ryd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Linaro Android has now moved up to 2.3.5.
>
> The daily builds (https://android-build.linaro.org/index) are now
> based on the linaro_android_2.3.5 branch of the manifest.
>
> Please rebase any dev_branches you have to 2.3.5. The
>
From: Per Forlin
Skip the use of work queue and call musb_dma_completion() directly from
DMA callback context.
Here follows measurements on a Snowball board with ondemand governor active.
Performance using work queue:
(105 MB) copied, 6.23758 s, 16.8 MB/s
(105 MB) copied, 5.7151 s, 18.3 MB/s
(1
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 7:02 AM, Michael Hope wrote:
>> Your distraction for the day...
>>
>> Toolchain has four PandaBoards that are used for building GCC, GDB,
>> and other interesting programs. Here's a graph of how busy they are:
>> ht
Hi,
Linaro Android has now moved up to 2.3.5.
The daily builds (https://android-build.linaro.org/index) are now
based on the linaro_android_2.3.5 branch of the manifest.
Please rebase any dev_branches you have to 2.3.5. The
linaro_android_2.3.4 branch will no longer be supported.
Regards
Patrik
> -Original Message-
> From: linux-samsung-soc-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-samsung-soc-
> ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Sachin Kamat
> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 3:59 PM
> To: linux-samsung-...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: kgene@samsung.com; linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org; pat
2011/8/17 Frans Gifford :
> Hi Mathieu,
>
> I think 0xdroid has ethernet support (I'm sure jserv could confirm).
> Did Movial get it from there?
hi Frans and Mathieu,
I think both Movial and 0xdroid have similar Ethernet implementations
since android-x86 project originally contributed it to publi
On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 00:13 -0300, Ricardo Salveti wrote:
> Yeah, if we're doing this change it seems it would make more sense to
> jump directly to the btrfs, unless we can demonstrate that the
> performance is not that superior and have any kind of blocker issues.
>
> Do we have any kind of bench
Hi
We actually got the patches from Always Innovating Android Tree:
http://git.alwaysinnovating.com/cgit.cgi/ai.android/tree/preprocess/gingerbread/patches/
I think the original source for the ethernet support (which AI then
extended somewhat) is the Android-x86 project (they carry very similar
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 7:02 AM, Michael Hope wrote:
> Your distraction for the day...
>
> Toolchain has four PandaBoards that are used for building GCC, GDB,
> and other interesting programs. Here's a graph of how busy they are:
> http://ex.seabright.co.nz/misc/utilisation/ursas.png
>
> The gre
Hi Mathieu,
I think 0xdroid has ethernet support (I'm sure jserv could confirm).
Did Movial get it from there?
Regards,
Frans
On 16 August 2011 23:32, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have started the interesting journey of connecting the ethernet
> controller on snowball to the andro
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 4:05 AM, Michael Hudson-Doyle <
michael.hud...@canonical.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 20:47:33 +0530, Deepti Kalakeri <
> deepti.kalak...@linaro.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 8:15 PM, James Westby >wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 18:02:02 +0530, Deepti
Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat
---
arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Kconfig |1 +
arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mach-origen.c |1 +
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Kconfig
index 3ab0f18..bdb76e2 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mac
Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey
Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat
---
arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Kconfig |2 ++
arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mach-origen.c | 17 +
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Kconfig
i
Signed-off-by: Bhuvana Kakunoori
Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey
Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat
---
arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Kconfig |2 ++
arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mach-smdkv310.c | 16
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Kcon
52 matches
Mail list logo
