https://wiki.linaro.org/Boards/MX53QuickStart
Sorry guys, although been pushed and pinged several times by various people
we are finally able to come up with a preliminary starting page for i.MX53
QuickStart board. It's currently very simple, and hopefully we'll get it
more detailed in the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I did some simple cpuidle measurements and updated the wiki page.
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Doc/Cpuset
Let me know what do you think about the result.
Is there a way to get the C-states statistics ?
Mike, you
Status report: https://wiki.linaro.org/OfficeofCTO/WeeklyReport
Meeting minutes: https://wiki.linaro.org/OfficeofCTO/2011-08-23
= 1109 plans = Check the status report link for more details
- UMM: https://launchpad.net/linaro-mm-sig/+milestone/2011.09
- ARMHF - work items from the following
Hi Tony,
On 30 August 2011 10:51, Tony Mansson tony.mans...@linaro.org wrote:
Hello,
On the topic of C-state statistics:
For 11.09 there are BP:s to A) fix powertop for ARM and B) create an
Android app for running powertop in Android. By that I mean executing
a reconfigured but
Hello Andy,
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 23:13:07 +0800
Andy Green andy.gr...@linaro.org wrote:
On 08/29/2011 09:22 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
It's not enough if you still want to refer to it via SHA, due to
repo peculiarities. It should be also reachable from one of the live
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 10:41:59 -0500
Zach Pfeffer zach.pfef...@linaro.org wrote:
On 29 August 2011 10:13, Andy Green andy.gr...@linaro.org wrote:
On 08/29/2011 09:22 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
It's not enough if you still want to refer to it via SHA, due to
repo
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 12:15:15 -0500
Zach Pfeffer zach.pfef...@linaro.org wrote:
[]
We could probably just update the branch after the automerge step.
What do you mean SHA1 reachability? I can reach arbitrary
HEADs using a hash even if they're not tagged so long as I didn't
garbage
-- Forwarded message --
From: Peter Maydell
Date: 30 August 2011 13:07
Subject: request for testing: qemu-linaro git tree
To: linaro-toolchain
Hi; I've just completed a tricky rebase of qemu-linaro on upstream;
there were several invasive upstream changes which have landed
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 18:42:29 +0200
Alexander Sack a...@linaro.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Paul Sokolovsky
paul.sokolov...@linaro.org
wrote:
It's not enough if you still want to refer to it via SHA, due to
repo peculiarities. It should be also reachable from one of the
mmc data transfer width is set as following:
WIDE8[5]:
0 = Depend on WIDE4
1 = 8-bit mode
WIDE4[1]:
1 = 4-bit mode
0 = 1-bit mode
In case of 4-bit mode reset 8-bit mode and
in case of 1-bit mode reset 8-bit mode and 4-bit mode
Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap chander.kash...@linaro.org
---
Hello,
Initial integration of Android Build and LAVA was launched in 11.07, so
works fore more than month now, but you couldn't pleasantly look at its
results. Thanks to efforts of the Validation team, now much improved UI
integration is launched, see Test results section at
On 30 August 2011 05:46, Paul Sokolovsky paul.sokolov...@linaro.org wrote:
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 18:42:29 +0200
Alexander Sack a...@linaro.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Paul Sokolovsky
paul.sokolov...@linaro.org
wrote:
It's not enough if you still want to refer to it via SHA,
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Tony Mansson tony.mans...@linaro.org wrote:
Hello,
On the topic of C-state statistics:
For 11.09 there are BP:s to A) fix powertop for ARM and B) create an
Android app for running powertop in Android. By that I mean executing
a reconfigured but upstreamable
Hi,
What was the timer used previously for benchmarks ?
Your page focuses on accuracy while I think an important point is already the
availability/functionality of clock_gettime(CLOCK_PROCESS/THREAD_CPUTIME_ID,
...) on ARM, which measures process/thread execution time vs wall time for
most
Status:
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Middleware/Multimedia/WeeklyReport
Meeting
Minutes:https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Middleware/Multimedia/Notes/2011-08-23
Highlights:
Group is now finishing the plans for 1109. Emphasis will be given on
completing some of the work threads, as
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 14:17:39 -0300
Ricardo Salveti
ricardo.salv...@linaro.org wrote:
Cross posting at ubuntu-devel.
- what would you like to be able to
cross-compile for the Linaro Ubuntu evaluation builds?
Libreoffice. An easy one for starters!
Best,
Bjoern
--
On 26 August 2011 15:36, Andy Doan andy.d...@linaro.org wrote:
The 11.08 release includes some commonly used pre-built images. This
mean you can now download a single file and dd it to your SD card
without having to use linaro-media-create.
The images just use the l-m-c defaults. ie, there's
On 08/30/2011 10:04 AM, David Gilbert wrote:
On 26 August 2011 15:36, Andy Doan andy.d...@linaro.org wrote:
The 11.08 release includes some commonly used pre-built images. This
mean you can now download a single file and dd it to your SD card
without having to use linaro-media-create.
The
On 29 August 2011 17:22, Riku Voipio riku.voi...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi,
We (Developer Platform) are looking into making Ubuntu/Debian more
cross-compile friendly. In order to
decide what to focus on on first, I'd like to ask from input from you
- what would you like to be able to
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 01:25:15PM +0300, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
Yeah, I have patch for that. But we cannot use before upstream accepts
it (because people will get errors checking out tree) and I don't hold
my breath for that at all.
Why wouldn't we provide our own version of repo that worked
Thanks Rob for the suggestion.
Same number of runs as last time, same data file as well of course.
PU: CPU with timer interrupt, speed 0 MHz (estimated)
Profiling through timer interrupt
samples %image name symbol name
35 40.2299 libjpeg.so.62.0.0decode_mcu
Because we push everything upstream.
On 30 August 2011 10:43, Christian Robottom Reis k...@linaro.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 01:25:15PM +0300, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
Yeah, I have patch for that. But we cannot use before upstream accepts
it (because people will get errors checking out
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:46:55AM -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
Because we push everything upstream.
While I agree with that blanket statement, there's no reason we wouldn't
provide a [potentially temporary] version of repo that included the
changes we're pushing upstream.
We do this for every
Hi,
As indicated by Siamashka, we are expected to operate at scheduler tick rate,
i.e. 128Hz (drivers/oprofile/timer_int.c). From your test, we have 84 ticks,
i.e. 656ms of test.
Is that correct ? I checked that also in our Android kernel and it was the same.
The only impacts we have seen in
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 12:50:51 -0300, Christian Robottom Reis k...@linaro.org
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:46:55AM -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
Because we push everything upstream.
While I agree with that blanket statement, there's no reason we wouldn't
provide a [potentially temporary]
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Turgis, Frederic f-tur...@ti.com wrote:
Hi,
As indicated by Siamashka, we are expected to operate at scheduler tick rate,
i.e. 128Hz (drivers/oprofile/timer_int.c). From your test, we have 84 ticks,
i.e. 656ms of test.
Is that correct ? I checked that also
On 30 August 2011 10:50, Christian Robottom Reis k...@linaro.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:46:55AM -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
Because we push everything upstream.
While I agree with that blanket statement, there's no reason we wouldn't
provide a [potentially temporary] version of repo
On 30 August 2011 10:58, James Westby james.wes...@canonical.com wrote:
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 12:50:51 -0300, Christian Robottom Reis k...@linaro.org
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:46:55AM -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
Because we push everything upstream.
While I agree with that blanket
Hi,
I could suggest to run 10 times the test in a row ;-) but oprofile clearly
relies on a configurable timer and not the scheduler tick itself so there is no
reason for this limitation, as this is not a rewrite.
For example x86 has a CONFIG_OPROFILE_EVENT_MULTIPLEX feature for which
Hi there.
The validation team has a new edge website,
http://edge.validation.linaro.org/ that reflects the development trunk
of all of our components. This site can be used to check latest
development effort, test bug fixes and, to some degree, use new features.
This website mimics the
I just wanted to make everyone aware of the fantastic job that the
infrastructure team and the validation team are doing to ensure that
our builds are extremely easy to use.
With the inclusion of test results on the build page:
https://android-build.linaro.org/builds/~linaro-android/panda/
We
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 6:57 PM, Zach Pfeffer zach.pfef...@linaro.orgwrote:
I just wanted to make everyone aware of the fantastic job that the
infrastructure team and the validation team are doing to ensure that
our builds are extremely easy to use.
With the inclusion of test results on
On 08/31/2011 12:58 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
On 29 August 2011 21:14, Andy Greenandy.gr...@linaro.org wrote:
On 08/30/2011 03:24 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
Andy Doan had the observation:
I hit a problem similar to this last year and discovered that
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 12:38 AM, Turgis, Frederic f-tur...@ti.com wrote:
Hi,
What was the timer used previously for benchmarks ?
It was a bit random across the different suites. CoreMark uses
clock_gettime(CLOCK_REALTIME, ...) which is a wall clock with NTP
adjustments. EEMBC uses clock()
On 30 August 2011 13:56, Andy Green andy.gr...@linaro.org wrote:
On 08/31/2011 12:58 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
On 29 August 2011 21:14, Andy Greenandy.gr...@linaro.org wrote:
On 08/30/2011 03:24 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
Andy Doan had the
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Zygmunt Krynicki
zygmunt.kryni...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi there.
The validation team has a new edge website, http://edge.validation.linaro.
**org/ http://edge.validation.linaro.org/ that reflects the development
trunk of all of our components. This site can be
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:10:10 -0500, Zach Pfeffer zach.pfef...@linaro.org
wrote:
There's no reason to do it now, because its solving the wrong problem.
The problem is sha's disappear. We use sha's because the provide
immovable references to the state of a set of git trees so that people
can
On 08/31/2011 05:22 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
What's his availability looking like? Will he be able to lend a hand soon?
I don't think so... sorry if you got the impression that he's some assignee
to Android team because I asked him to get a gerrit account, it really is
+++ Konstantinos Margaritis [2011-08-30 18:26 +0300]:
On 29 August 2011 17:22, Riku Voipio riku.voi...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi,
Ok, not directly related to Linaro only, but from the armhf buildd configs:
quantlib-swig
openvswitch
pivy
ns3
qtwebkit
webkitgtk+
koffice
mrpt
Sachin Kamat wrote:
Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey pankaj.du...@samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat sachin.ka...@linaro.org
---
arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Kconfig |2 ++
arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mach-origen.c | 17 +
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Paul Sokolovsky
paul.sokolov...@linaro.org wrote:
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 18:42:29 +0200
Alexander Sack a...@linaro.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Paul Sokolovsky
paul.sokolov...@linaro.org
wrote:
It's not enough if you still want to
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 2:09 AM, James Westby james.wes...@canonical.comwrote:
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:10:10 -0500, Zach Pfeffer zach.pfef...@linaro.org
wrote:
There's no reason to do it now, because its solving the wrong problem.
The problem is sha's disappear. We use sha's because the
Tushar Behera wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Tushar Behera [mailto:tushar.beh...@linaro.org]
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2011 6:39 PM
To: linux-samsung-...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org; kgene@samsung.com; patc...@linaro.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: EXYNOS4: Add
Tushar Behera wrote:
Fix incorrect value of cd_type field in platform data for sdhci
device.
Based on ARM: EXYNOS4: Fix card detection for sdhci 0 and 2.
commit a0d8efedb203b5b908dd46cea38201761e2380f9
Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera tushar.beh...@linaro.org
---
Sachin Kamat wrote:
This patch adds definitions to enable support for s5p-fimc driver on
Origen board.
Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat sachin.ka...@linaro.org
---
arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Kconfig |4
arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mach-origen.c |4
2 files changed, 8
Sachin Kamat wrote:
From: Giridhar Maruthy giridhar.maru...@linaro.org
This patch adds support for LCD backlight using PWM timer on
Origen board.
Signed-off-by: Giridhar Maruthy giridhar.maru...@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat sachin.ka...@linaro.org
---
Sachin Kamat wrote:
Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat sachin.ka...@linaro.org
---
arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Kconfig |1 +
arch/arm/mach-exynos4/mach-origen.c |1 +
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos4/Kconfig
Hey all,
As we're having the Linaro Connect Q4.11 together with UDS-P, would
like to know if there is any special topic it'd be useful to cover as
a summit there.
Any ARM related topics that might be related with cross-distro
collaboration or just related with Ubuntu/Debian should fit.
Some
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 9:55 PM, Ricardo Salveti
ricardo.salv...@linaro.org wrote:
Hey all,
As we're having the Linaro Connect Q4.11 together with UDS-P, would
like to know if there is any special topic it'd be useful to cover as
a summit there.
Any ARM related topics that might be related
On 30 August 2011 19:09, James Westby james.wes...@canonical.com wrote:
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:10:10 -0500, Zach Pfeffer zach.pfef...@linaro.org
wrote:
There's no reason to do it now, because its solving the wrong problem.
The problem is sha's disappear. We use sha's because the provide
On 30 August 2011 19:48, Alexander Sack a...@linaro.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 2:09 AM, James Westby james.wes...@canonical.com
wrote:
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:10:10 -0500, Zach Pfeffer zach.pfef...@linaro.org
wrote:
There's no reason to do it now, because its solving the wrong
I see snowball uses the mali400 gpu. To enable hw 3D acceleration, i got
the mali driver and android HAL source code from the ARM web site, but
no mali DDK cause it uses commercial license.
So how can I enable hw 3D acceleration on snowball for android? Is it in
developing?
Sachin Kamat wrote:
From: Pankaj Dubey pankaj.du...@samsung.com
This patch removes the intermediate exynos4_usb_phy1_init and
exynos4_usb_phy1_exit function calls.
Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey pankaj.du...@samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat sachin.ka...@linaro.org
---
53 matches
Mail list logo
