Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] alsa ucm in pulseaudio

On 10/14/2011 04:47 AM, Feng Wei wrote: Hi Liam, Mark, Colin, and all, I study the codes in pulseaudio and alsa ucm patch recently, and create a page of my study result. I appreciate your feedback. The page is at https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Middleware/Multimedia/Specs//AudioInte

Re: error while running l-m-c on one build machine

Hi Tushar, On 14 October 2011 06:40, Tushar Behera wrote: > Hi, > > In one of the build machines, I am getting following error [1] while > building a qemu image with l-m-c using leb build for origen. The build fails > only on this one machine. Do yo use same the linaro-image-tools and qemu versi

error while running l-m-c on one build machine

Hi, In one of the build machines, I am getting following error [1] while building a qemu image with l-m-c using leb build for origen. The build fails only on this one machine. Does anybody have a clue about what might be wrong with that build machine? The build machine is a x86 based system

alsa ucm in pulseaudio

Hi Liam, Mark, Colin, and all, I study the codes in pulseaudio and alsa ucm patch recently, and create a page of my study result. I appreciate your feedback. The page is at https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Middleware/Multimedia/Specs//AudioIntegration/UCMPulseAudio/Analyzation. Also i

Re: sneak preview of kernel ci views

On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 17:45:10 +0100, Dave Martin wrote: > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Alexander Sack wrote: > > Filed a bunch more. Check: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lava-kernel-ci-views/ Ta. > Cool, thanks. > > I wasn't sure whether to raise bugs, since my points were suggestions > for fe

pinctrl_config APIs, and other pinmux questions

Linus, (and other people interested in pinmux!) I've started to look at porting the Tegra pinmux driver to your pinctrl subsystem. In order to replace the existing pinmux driver, I need a way to support configuring options such as tri-state, pull-up/down, drive- strength, etc. At this point, I ha

Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] clk: Add simple gated clock

On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 03:26:59PM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote: >> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-gate.c b/drivers/clk/clk-gate.c >> new file mode 100644 >> index 000..a1d8e79 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-gate.c >> @

Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] clk: Add a generic clock infrastructure

On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 7:44 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 03:26:56PM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote: >>   struct clk_hw_ops { >>       int             (*prepare)(struct clk_hw *); >>       void            (*unprepare)(struct clk_hw *); >>       int             (*enabl

Re: sneak preview of kernel ci views

On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Alexander Sack wrote: > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Dave Martin wrote: >> >> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 01:16:30PM +1300, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > I've done a stealth deploy (stealth as in "no links point to this page") >> > of the firs

Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] clk: Add simple gated clock

On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 03:26:59PM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote: > diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-gate.c b/drivers/clk/clk-gate.c > new file mode 100644 > index 000..a1d8e79 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-gate.c > @@ -0,0 +1,78 @@ > +/* > + * Copyright (C) 2010-2011 Canonical Ltd > + * >

Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] clk: Add a generic clock infrastructure

On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 03:26:56PM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote: > struct clk_hw_ops { > int (*prepare)(struct clk_hw *); > void(*unprepare)(struct clk_hw *); > int (*enable)(struct clk_hw *); > void(*disable)(struct clk_hw *)

Re: sneak preview of kernel ci views

On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Dave Martin wrote: > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 01:16:30PM +1300, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I've done a stealth deploy (stealth as in "no links point to this page") > > of the first cut of the kernel ci view I've been working on: > > > > htt

Re: sneak preview of kernel ci views

On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 01:16:30PM +1300, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > Hi all, > > I've done a stealth deploy (stealth as in "no links point to this page") > of the first cut of the kernel ci view I've been working on: > > http://validation.linaro.org/lava-server/kernel-ci-views/index > > I

Re: [ACTIVITY] Android Platform Team 2011-10-03 to 2011-10-09

On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Tony Mansson wrote: > * Strict-aliasing violations in 2.3.5 have been fixed. > I remember that we disabled -Werror because of various issues ... with those strict-aliasing fixes, what is left before we can turn that on again? -- Alexander Sack Technical Director

[ACTIVITY] Android Platform Team 2011-10-03 to 2011-10-09

Key Points for wider discussion === * 11.10 Android Pre Release 1 is built and tested: https://docs.google.com/a/linaro.org/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AnpUtxWjZbP9dGFDUk5kNXBoeWZDb3MyUmJ4cnBHTEE&hl=en_US * The Monkey test for Android in LAVA is ready for deployment. Team Hi

On OS-autoinst and LAVA

Hi. I noticed your project (http://os-autoinst.org/) and I decided to say hello. :-) I'm one of the developers behind LAVA. Essentially LAVA is an automated testing thing focused on practical ARM testing. We have a scheduler for planning, dispatcher for automating boot and starting the test,

Re: [PATCH 1/2] drivers: create a pin control subsystem v9

On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 5:18 AM, Grant Likely wrote: > Nit: put the changelog above the s-o-b lines so it will appear in the > linux commit log. OK I'll collect all of them and stash them into it for v10 >> +The GPIO drivers may want to perform operations of various types on the same >> +physic

Re: [PATCH 1/2] drivers: create a pin control subsystem v9

On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 2:55 AM, Chanho Park wrote: > Some gpio-ranges doesn't match with pin numbers. > For example, gpio_range_b starts gpio 48. > However, a pin base number of gpio_range_b is 96. It isn't same with gpio > base. > A pinctrl driver must know this pin_space-gpio_range mappings.