I saw a topic 'Multi-core decision co-ordination' at
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Doc/CPUFreq .
Is it still going on?
Thanks
Richard
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listin
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Lalancette, Christopher
wrote:
> Hello John,
> I'm currently working on bringing up a new OMAP4 board that is
> similar in many respects to the pandaboard. While playing around with
> the panda, I've noticed that upstream u-boot (from denx.de) has several
> pro
On 9 December 2011 13:41, Zygmunt Krynicki wrote:
> W dniu 09.12.2011 20:01, Kurt Taylor pisze:
>
> Here is a list of the upcoming audio work for Linaro. I am planning on
>> putting this together into a much more polished roadmap and schedule,
>> but its a start.
>>
>> This is absolutely not set
delivered in eg
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-preinstalled/20111209/ (support for
omap4/omap/mx5/ac1000 and possibly soon efika)
- ARM Server - Started Server PM discussions with Paul and Amit
- Kernel work - worked with PMWG to rework CPU hotplug on ARM, and also
worked on 4G/4G
- Boot Architecture
Weekly dashboard (NEW layout!) with details and links:
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Middleware/Multimedia/WeeklyReport
Last weekly meeting:
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Middleware/Multimedia/Notes/2011-12-06
Highlights:
- New technical lead in charge and at large! Transition on
Hello John,
I'm currently working on bringing up a new OMAP4 board that is
similar in many respects to the pandaboard. While playing around with
the panda, I've noticed that upstream u-boot (from denx.de) has several
problems, starting with getting the USB/Ethernet hub up and running.
Additio
W dniu 09.12.2011 20:01, Kurt Taylor pisze:
Here is a list of the upcoming audio work for Linaro. I am planning on
putting this together into a much more polished roadmap and schedule,
but its a start.
This is absolutely not set and I am actually looking for any additional
requirements and comme
Here is a list of the upcoming audio work for Linaro. I am planning on
putting this together into a much more polished roadmap and schedule, but
its a start.
This is absolutely not set and I am actually looking for any additional
requirements and comments. I am sure I have forgotten some, if you d
Enclosed please find the link to the Weekly Status report & meeting
minutes
for the Power Management working group for the week ending 2011-12-09
== Weekly Status Report ==
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Status/2011-12-08
== Meeting Minutes ==
https://wiki.linaro.org/Wor
Enclosed please find the link to the Weekly Status & Individual Activity
reports
for the kernel working group for the week ending 2011-12-09
== Weekly Status Report ==
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Kernel/Status/2011-12-08
== Individual Activity Report ==
https://wiki.linaro.org/Work
The Dialog PMIC has below featured regulators:-
DA9052-BC - 4 DVS Buck converters 0.5V - 3.6V upto 1Amp.
DA9053-AA/BX - 4 DVS Buck converters 0.5V - 2.5V upto 3Amp.
DA9052/53 - 10 Programmable LDO's High PSSR, 1% accuracy.
This patch support all the DA9052 and Da9053 regulators. The output voltage
Driver for DA9052 battery charger. This driver depends on DA9052 MFD core dirver
for definitions and methods.
This patch is functionally tested on Samsung SMDKV6410.
Signed-off-by: David Dajun Chen
Signed-off-by: Ashish Jangam
---
Changes since v4
- Remove unnecessary type cast
- Improve code r
LED module has dependency on some gpio macros therefore they are moved to a
header file.
This patch is functionally tested on Samsung SMDKV6410.
Signed-off-by: David Dajun Chen
Signed-off-by: Ashish Jangam
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-da9052.c | 26 ++---
include/linux/mfd/da9
The DA9052/53 is a highly integrated PMIC subsystem with supply domain
flexibility to support wide range of high performance application.
It provides voltage regulators, GPIO controller, Touch Screen, RTC, Battery
control and other functionality.
This patch is functionally tested on Samsung SMDKV
The DA9052/53 is a highly integrated PMIC subsystem with supply domain
flexibility to support wide range of high performance application.
It provides voltage regulators, GPIO controller, Touch Screen, RTC, Battery
control and other functionality.
This patch is functionally tested on Samsung SMDKV
The DA9052/53 is a highly integrated PMIC subsystem with supply domain
flexibility to support wide range of high performance application.
It provides voltage regulators, GPIO controller, Touch Screen, RTC, Battery
control and other functionality.
This patch is functionally tested on Samsung SMDKV
The following patch series adds initial support for the Dialog Semiconductor
DA9052/53 PMICs.
The DA9052/53 PMICs support many functionalities like GPIOs, regulators,
power-supply, touchscreen, rtc, backlight, etc. So these patches are applicable
to different sub-systems of the kernel separately.
s3c24xx_i2c_parse_dt_gpio is called when cfg_gpio is not defined
in the platform data of the i2c device. When DT is not enabled,
the above function always returns -EINVAL. Since there can be
some i2c devices which don't need to configure any gpio lines,
the probe of such devices would fail here. Ch
You are correct.
There is no commit. I have removed the item from the report. Thank you for
spotting this error.
/Tony
On 9 December 2011 10:21, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 00:14 +0100, Tony Mansson wrote:
> > The Weekly Status Report from the Android Platform Team is av
Likewise, I've found it useful when we can operate as a tag team both connected
to a board, and discussing things over IRC.
Dave Pigott
Validation Engineer
T: +44 1223 45 00 24 | M +44 7940 45 93 44
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
On 8 Dec
On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 00:14 +0100, Tony Mansson wrote:
> The Weekly Status Report from the Android Platform Team is available
>
> here: https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Android/Status/2011-12-08
The report says this bug 894502 is fixed "No Ethernet Communication
Manager on ICS."
I can't find any
Dear Chander Kashyap,
On 7 December 2011 18:34, Chander Kashyap wrote:
> As per new naming convention for Samsung SoC's, all Cortex-A9 and Cortex-A15
> based SoC's will be classified under the name Exynos. Cortex-A9 and Cortex-A15
> based SoC's will be sub-classified as Exynos4 and Exynos5 respec
22 matches
Mail list logo
