Actually including linaro-android and modifying the subject a little...
On 30 January 2012 22:24, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> Linaro Android 12.02 is also ready to roll:
>
> https://launchpad.net/linaro-android/+milestone/12.02
>
> We're generally working through the issues from the last cycle listed
>
Linaro Android 12.02 is also ready to roll:
https://launchpad.net/linaro-android/+milestone/12.02
We're generally working through the issues from the last cycle listed
in the 12.01 spreadsheet entry with a distinct Snowball bent this
cycle - since we're trying and get Google Hangouts working on i
Hi guys,
As we're almost done with 12.02 planning, I'd like to share the
current blueprints we intend to work during the 12.02 cycle:
https://launchpad.net/linaro-dev-platform/+milestone/12.02
I know this is a quite short cycle, as we'll have the Linaro Connect,
Android Builders and ELC, but I re
Hey folks,
As usual, follows a list of the sessions the Developer Platform Team
will lead at this Connect:
Ubuntu LEB and LAVA: Current status and future planning for proper
image testing and validation
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/linaro-ubuntu/+spec/linaro-platforms-q112-lava-and-ubuntu-leb
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 12:44:40 +0400, Dmitry Antipov
wrote:
> Use ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR allocation pointer checking where allocation
> function may return ZERO_SIZE_PTR.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Antipov
> ---
> kernel/module.c | 12 ++--
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 02:26:06PM -0600, Kurt Taylor wrote:
> Is this complete? Absolutely not. This is meant to be a place to capture
> and refine ideas before creating cards and/or blueprints for them. In other
> words, this should compliment the existing work and backlog already in LP.
Looks
Greeting,
Here is the postmortem and lessons learned for Linaro's first release for 2012.
https://wiki.linaro.org/Cycles/1201/Release/Review
Highlights and Key Successes
The Ubuntu development platform team has delivered Ubuntu TV
fully accelerated on a PandaBoard
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012, Dmitry Antipov wrote:
> Fix pcpu_alloc() to return ZERO_SIZE_PTR if requested size is 0;
> fix free_percpu() to check passed pointer with ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR.
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.l
all right
so welcome to 12.02!
the goal is to mkae snowball work great
and origen
iMX53 is semi blocked
There's still stuff to try there
and panda gets a lot of attention
But it would be really useful to get some more information
bero, lets hold off on iMX53 until we have more info
the th
Use ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR allocation pointer checking where allocation
function may return ZERO_SIZE_PTR.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Antipov
---
kernel/module.c | 12 ++--
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c
index 2c93276..5183f91 1006
- Fix vmap() to return ZERO_SIZE_PTR if 0 pages are requested;
- fix __vmalloc_node_range() to return ZERO_SIZE_PTR if 0 bytes
are requested;
- fix __vunmap() to check passed pointer with ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Antipov
---
mm/vmalloc.c | 10 +++---
1 files changed, 7
Fix pcpu_alloc() to return ZERO_SIZE_PTR if requested size is 0;
fix free_percpu() to check passed pointer with ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Antipov
---
mm/percpu.c | 16 +++-
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/percpu.c b/mm/percpu.c
index
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:28:12 +0400, Dmitry Antipov
wrote:
> On 01/27/2012 03:21 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
>
> > Please fix __vmalloc_node_range() instead to return ZERO_SIZE_PTR.
> > And of course, vfree() to use ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR().
>
> For the convenience and uniformity, should {alloc,free}_per
13 matches
Mail list logo
