[PATCH] module: debugging check for runaway kthreads

Debugging option CONFIG_MODULE_KTHREAD_CHECK provides a way to check whether all kernel threads created by the module and have used module code as a thread worker function are really exited when the module is unloaded. See http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=132811276131767&w=2 to check why it migh

Re: native gdb for Android

Hi Ulrich, 2012/2/3 Ulrich Weigand : > Barry Song <21cn...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> So my questions are: >> >> 1.   Should I compile the native gdb using android toolchain and android >> bionic/libthread libraries? >> 2.   Why can’t the current gdb capture multithreads for android >> processes? This

Re: [opensuse-arm] Re: Wanted: superstar hacker to complete Mono port to armhf

On 03.02.2012, at 00:22, Jo Shields wrote: > On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 00:15 +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: >> On 03.02.2012, at 00:11, Hector Oron wrote: >> >>> Hello Jo, >>> >>> I am forwarding the message to a couple mailing lists which might have >>> people interested on the Mono porting for ARM

Re: Wanted: superstar hacker to complete Mono port to armhf

On 03.02.2012, at 00:11, Hector Oron wrote: > Hello Jo, > > I am forwarding the message to a couple mailing lists which might have > people interested on the Mono porting for ARM hard-float ABI. > > 2012/2/2 Jo Shields : >> Right now, Mono is available in Debian armhf. This is a hack - what >>

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v7 4/4] EXYNOS: SMDK5250: Add MMC SPL support

On Thursday 02 February 2012 04:11:27 Chander Kashyap wrote: > --- /dev/null > +++ b/board/samsung/smdk5250/tools/mkexynos_image.c tools should be in tools/. there are already plenty of examples in there (see tools/msxboot.c as the first example i found by reading tools/Makefile). > +int main(i

Re: [opensuse-arm] Re: Wanted: superstar hacker to complete Mono port to armhf

On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 00:25 +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: > On 03.02.2012, at 00:22, Jo Shields wrote: > > > On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 00:15 +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: > >> On 03.02.2012, at 00:11, Hector Oron wrote: > >> > >>> Hello Jo, > >>> > >>> I am forwarding the message to a couple mailing l

Re: Wanted: superstar hacker to complete Mono port to armhf

On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 00:15 +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: > On 03.02.2012, at 00:11, Hector Oron wrote: > > > Hello Jo, > > > > I am forwarding the message to a couple mailing lists which might have > > people interested on the Mono porting for ARM hard-float ABI. > > > > 2012/2/2 Jo Shields : >

linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org

Dear Ricardo and Haitao, >> Bug 3: HDMI sound interrupt. >> Bug 4: HDMI Display not fine and some noise signal on the monitor with >> Ubuntu 11.10 over Linaro 12.01. > For enable HDMI display, you will need to modify your u-boot parameter > manually, > and for audio output from HDMI, we only sup

Re: Wanted: superstar hacker to complete Mono port to armhf

Hello Jo, I am forwarding the message to a couple mailing lists which might have people interested on the Mono porting for ARM hard-float ABI. 2012/2/2 Jo Shields : > Right now, Mono is available in Debian armhf. This is a hack - what > we're actually doing is building Mono as an armhf binary, bu

Re: Linaro Android against vanilla linux kernel versions

Hello Tugrul, On Thu, 2 Feb 2012 16:12:29 +0200 "Guclu, Tugrul" wrote: > Hi > > I have already asked thi question at > http://ask.linaro.org/questions/607/looking-for-android-distribution-bui > ld-on-top-of-linux-kernel-26359-for-imx53-board >

Re: native gdb for Android

Hi Barry, On Thu, 2012-02-02 at 10:23 +0800, Barry Song wrote: > 2.Why can’t the current gdb capture multithreads for android > processes? This question is actually about the theory for gdb to know > multi-threads. In my opinion, both gnu and android use clone() to fork > threads and threads i

Re: ubuntu-desktop/sources.txt bug/typo?

On 02/02/2012 11:43 AM, Scott Douglass wrote: > Hi, > > > > I’ve noticed what looks like a bug/typo in > http://releases.linaro.org/images/12.01/oneiric/ubuntu-desktop/sources.txt > and I wonder if this is the right place to report it? Thanks. > This is the correct place. I just fixed the is

Re: Connect Sessions from the Developer Platform Team

Another important one :-) Maximizing the usefulness of the LEB for customers and members https://blueprints.launchpad.net/linaro-ubuntu/+spec/linaro-platforms-q112-maximizing-usefulness-leb Goal is to get feedback from people consuming our LEBs, so we can understand better what we need to improve

ubuntu-desktop/sources.txt bug/typo?

Hi, I've noticed what looks like a bug/typo in http://releases.linaro.org/images/12.01/oneiric/ubuntu-desktop/sources.txt and I wonder if this is the right place to report it? Thanks. The last entry has "linarotv-xbmc" where I would expect "ubuntu-desktop": ... panda-ubuntu-desktop: http://r

Re: [RFC PATCH v4 2/4] ARM: omap: Remove cpuidle timekeeping and irq enable/disable

On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Jean Pihet wrote: > Rob, > > On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 4:00 AM, Robert Lee wrote: >> Now that the core cpuidle driver keeps time and handles irq enabling, >> remove this functionality.  Also, remove irq disabling as all paths to >> cpuidle_idle_call already call loca

Re: Template

And if you want to upload it to Google docs, then do the following steps, otherwise, there will be no pre-view. 1. Open Linaro-Template.odp with openoffice.org presentation; 2. Save it as ppt format; 3. Upload this ppt file to Google Docs. FYI. On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 1:51 AM, Zach Pfeffer wrot

Re: native gdb for Android

Barry Song <21cn...@gmail.com> wrote: > So my questions are: > > 1. Should I compile the native gdb using android toolchain and android > bionic/libthread libraries? > 2. Why can’t the current gdb capture multithreads for android > processes? This question is actually about the theory for gdb

Re: [RFC PATCH v4 2/4] ARM: omap: Remove cpuidle timekeeping and irq enable/disable

Rob, On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 4:00 AM, Robert Lee wrote: > Now that the core cpuidle driver keeps time and handles irq enabling, > remove this functionality.  Also, remove irq disabling as all paths to > cpuidle_idle_call already call local_irq_disable.  Also, restructure > idle functions as needed

Re: [RFC] Upcoming work view for individual engineers

On 02/02/12 12:28, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 2 February 2012 08:28, Mattias Backman wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 4:24 AM, Ricardo Salveti >> wrote: >>> 4 - Do you know if a similar page, but for a team, will also be available? >> >> There will be. Guilherme has circulated a mockup for that to

Re: [RFC] Upcoming work view for individual engineers

On 2 February 2012 08:28, Mattias Backman wrote: > On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 4:24 AM, Ricardo Salveti > wrote: >> 4 - Do you know if a similar page, but for a team, will also be available? > > There will be. Guilherme has circulated a mockup for that too, on the > techleads list. Is there going to

Re: [RFC] Upcoming work view for individual engineers

Hi Ricardo, On 02/02/12 05:28, Mattias Backman wrote: > On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 4:24 AM, Ricardo Salveti > wrote: >> Hey, >> >> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Guilherme Salgado >> wrote: >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> We're trying to make status.l.o more useful to engineers and the first >>> thing we're

Linaro Android against vanilla linux kernel versions

Hi I have already asked thi question at http://ask.linaro.org/questions/607/looking-for-android-distribution-bui ld-on-top-of-linux-kernel-26359-for-imx53-board but could no

Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] thermal: Add generic cpu cooling implementation

On 1 February 2012 20:27, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 08:43:16PM +0530, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote: >> This patch adds support for generic cpu thermal cooling low level >> implementations using frequency scaling and cpuhotplugg currently. > > We've been over this kind of thing

[PATCH v7 3/4] EXYNOS: Add SMDK5250 board support

SMDK5250 board is based on Samsungs EXYNOS5250 SoC. Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap --- Changes for v2: - This patch is bifurcated into borad support and SoC support - Fixed typo: s/EEYNOS/EXYNOS - Squashed patch "SMDK5250: enable device tree support" in this. Changes for v

[PATCH v7 2/4] ARM: EXYNOS: Add support for Exynos5 based SoCs

Samsung's ARM Cortex-A15 based SoCs are known as Exynos5 series of SoCs. This patch adds the support for Exynos5. Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap --- Changes for v2: - This patch was part of "EXYNOS: Add SMDK5250 board support" - Now it is seprated as SoC support. Changes for v3:

[PATCH v7 4/4] EXYNOS: SMDK5250: Add MMC SPL support

This patch adds support for MMC SPL booting. Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap --- Changes for v2: - None Changes for v3: - None Changes for v4: - None Changes for v5: - None Changes for v6: - None Changes for v7: - None board/samsung/smdk5250/Makefi

[PATCH v7 1/4] Exynos: Clock.c: Use CONFIG_SYS_CLK_FREQ macro

CONFIG_SYS_CLK_FREQ_C210 macro giving notion of S5PC2XX (Exynos4) architecture. Replace CONFIG_SYS_CLK_FREQ_C210 with CONFIG_SYS_CLK_FREQ to make it generic for exynos architecture. Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap --- Changes for v2: - None Changes for v3: - None Changes for V4:

[PATCH v7 0/4] Add SMDK5250 board support

This patchset add support for Samsung's SMDK5250 board based on EXYNOS5250 based SoC. It also adds support for MMC SPL booting. The porting is done by Samsung engineers at HQ in System LSI Team. I am contributing in upstreaming the code for the board. Based upon discussions following patches are

Re: cpu_relax in busy loops question

On 02/01/2012 09:17 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: Hi Linus, While looking at the drivers/mfd/db8500-prcmu.c file I noticed: 595 /* Grab the HW semaphore. */ 596 while ((readl(PRCM_SEM)& PRCM_SEM_PRCM_SEM) != 0) 597

Re: [RFC] Upcoming work view for individual engineers

On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 4:24 AM, Ricardo Salveti wrote: > Hey, > > On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Guilherme Salgado > wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> We're trying to make status.l.o more useful to engineers and the first >> thing we're planning to do is a new page listing the upcoming work >> assigned