Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: imx: Add common imx cpuidle init functionality.

On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:18:55PM -0500, Rob Lee wrote: > >>> If I called imx_cpuidle_init directly from imx5 or imx6q init > >>> routines, it would be getting called before the coreinit_call of core > >>> cpuidle causing a failure.  There were various other directions to > >>> take and all seemed

Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: imx: Add common imx cpuidle init functionality.

>>> If I called imx_cpuidle_init directly from imx5 or imx6q init >>> routines, it would be getting called before the coreinit_call of core >>> cpuidle causing a failure.  There were various other directions to >>> take and all seemed less desirable than this one. >>> >>> One alternative would be t

Re: Preliminary 12.04 linux-linaro kernel tree

On 04/19/2012 08:53 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said: >> OK, so this is a major change to what linux-linaro was before. > > While this is different, it's not entirely different from what we had > before. The major change here is that we're accepting a broader range > of topics, but i

Re: Preliminary 12.04 linux-linaro kernel tree

On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Andy Green wrote: > On 04/18/2012 08:39 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said: >> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 3:04 AM, Andy Green > > wrote: >> >>     On 04/18/2012 06:16 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said: >> >>     Hi

Re: 3.3 kernel from TI landing teams and powervr problems.

On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 2:52 AM, Martin Ertsås wrote: > Thanks to this, I got x running, problem is that I don't seem to have > direct rendering. First it complained that glx could not be loaded. When > adding the glx extensions from the xserver, I get some problems with > AIGLX. It sais that /usr

Re: Preliminary 12.04 linux-linaro kernel tree

On 04/18/2012 08:39 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said: > > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 3:04 AM, Andy Green > wrote: > > On 04/18/2012 06:16 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said: > > Hi - > > > I've pushed the current linux-linaro tr

Re: No group tracks at Connect

On 18 April 2012 12:45, David Rusling wrote: > Hmmm.    I prefer Kiko's topics, these can also be grouped under the TL's.   > Each time we've tried this, we've ended up with WG / team driven tracks as > before... I think Kiko's topics are good too. Perhaps if we also added, will demonstrate on p

Re: No group tracks at Connect

On 18 April 2012 15:15, Alexander Sack wrote: > On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 7:45 PM, David Rusling > wrote: >> >> Hmmm.    I prefer Kiko's topics, these can also be grouped under the TL's. >>  Each time we've tried this, we've ended up with WG / team driven tracks as >> before... >> > > where are kik

Re: Preliminary 12.04 linux-linaro kernel tree

Greetings, I updated (overwrote) the current linux-linaro tree (git://git.linaro.org/kernel/linux-linaro-tracking.git , linux-linaro branch). Changes to the previous version: * topics merge order changed: generic topics first, LT's topics last: -8<- integration linux-linaro v3.4-rc3 uf

Re: No group tracks at Connect

On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 7:45 PM, David Rusling wrote: > Hmmm.I prefer Kiko's topics, these can also be grouped under the TL's. > Each time we've tried this, we've ended up with WG / team driven tracks as > before... > > where are kikos topics? -- Alexander Sack Technical Director, Linaro

Re: [PATCH] iommu: OMAP: device detach on domain destroy

Hi Joerg, On 12 April 2012 05:25, Joerg Roedel wrote: > Doesn't apply against 3.4-rc2. Please rebase and send a new version. I rebased the patch and sent v2. Thanks, Omar ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.or

[PATCH v2] iommu: OMAP: device detach on domain destroy

'domain_destroy with devices attached' case isn't yet handled, instead code assumes that the device was already detached. If the domain is destroyed the hardware still has access to invalid pointers to its page table and internal iommu object. In order to detach the users we need to track devices

Re: No group tracks at Connect

Hmmm.I prefer Kiko's topics, these can also be grouped under the TL's. Each time we've tried this, we've ended up with WG / team driven tracks as before... Dave On 18 Apr 2012, at 16:43, Zach Pfeffer wrote: > While we're planning for connect, I'd like to suggest that we do away > with tea

Re: No group tracks at Connect

On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Zach Pfeffer wrote: > On 18 April 2012 12:05, Tom Gall wrote: >> I like the idea of topic focused sessions, not sure I'm sold on a >> complete switch. >> >> I've got an initial list of top sessions at >> https://wiki.linaro.org/TomGall/DraftPlan/2012-2QLC above a

Re: No group tracks at Connect

On 18 April 2012 12:05, Tom Gall wrote: > I like the idea of topic focused sessions, not sure I'm sold on a > complete switch. > > I've got an initial list of top sessions at > https://wiki.linaro.org/TomGall/DraftPlan/2012-2QLC above and beyond > that sessions I've already proposed. Hmm.. link l

Re: No group tracks at Connect

I like the idea of topic focused sessions, not sure I'm sold on a complete switch. I've got an initial list of top sessions at https://wiki.linaro.org/TomGall/DraftPlan/2012-2QLC above and beyond that sessions I've already proposed. On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Stephen Doel wrote: > Hi Zach

Re: No group tracks at Connect

On 18 April 2012 11:40, Stephen Doel wrote: > Hi Zach, > > Yes, this is a recurring discussion before Connects. Almost every time, we > try to go Topic based, and each time we end up cycling back to Team Tracks. > So, if we can get a good set of Topics, we're open to change I saw some good to

RE: No group tracks at Connect

Hi Zach, Yes, this is a recurring discussion before Connects. Almost every time, we try to go Topic based, and each time we end up cycling back to Team Tracks. So, if we can get a good set of Topics, we're open to change Thx Stephen -Original Message- From: Zach Pfeffer [mailto:zach

No group tracks at Connect

While we're planning for connect, I'd like to suggest that we do away with team tracks all together and just have topic tracks. This would align with our topic based approach to things now, and would be a way to breakdown our silo's. The topic track would be lead by a topic champion. What do people

Re: Preliminary 12.04 linux-linaro kernel tree

On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 09:55 -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote: > On 18 April 2012 09:24, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 08:59 -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote: > >> On 17 April 2012 17:16, Andrey Konovalov > >> wrote: > > [...] > >> > * tracking-linaro-android-3.4: I've tried it with a sm

Re: Preliminary 12.04 linux-linaro kernel tree

On 18 April 2012 09:24, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 08:59 -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote: >> On 17 April 2012 17:16, Andrey Konovalov wrote: > [...] >> > * tracking-linaro-android-3.4: I've tried it with a smaller subset of the >> >> Tixy, will your tracking vexpress Android bui

[PATCH 0/4] OMAP thermal fixes

Hello guys, Here are a couple of fixes and clean ups on the omap thermal code. These are trivial I'd say. There is one question about the location of the BG sensor code. Looking to the existing code under drivers/thermal/, looks like it is practice to keep the sensor driver code there as well. S

[PATCH 3/4] MFD: omap temp sensor: rework initialization sequence

This is a simplification of the initialization sequence of the omap temp sensor. Now all code related to cpu cooling is concentrated in only one place. This patch also properly handle the fail path, by freeing the right resources, in case the initialization fails. Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin

[PATCH 4/4] omap thermal: fix off by one issue

As of now, the function to check what have triggered a thermal event is accessing wrong data area. This patch changes the way to match the trip point triggering the thermal event. Now it won't access the memory out of its usable range. Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin --- drivers/thermal/omap_th

[PATCH 2/4] MFD: omap scm: remove all references to TI THERMAL_FRAMEWORK config

The TI thermal framework is a non existing entity in mainline kernel. It is a framework present inside TI android tree. This patch removes references to this config entry from the SCM driver code. Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin --- drivers/mfd/omap4460plus_temp_sensor.c | 153 +

[PATCH 1/4] thermal: omap: fix get mode function

This patch changes the behavior of omap thermal zone so that if the data structures are not setup, it will always return 'disabled' while if data structures are set, then it will return the actual state. Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin --- drivers/thermal/omap_thermal.c |8 +--- 1 files

Re: Preliminary 12.04 linux-linaro kernel tree

On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 08:59 -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote: > On 17 April 2012 17:16, Andrey Konovalov wrote: [...] > > * tracking-linaro-android-3.4: I've tried it with a smaller subset of the > > Tixy, will your tracking vexpress Android build use a older kernel > version if this doesn't work

Re: Preliminary 12.04 linux-linaro kernel tree

On 17 April 2012 17:16, Andrey Konovalov wrote: > Greetings, > > I've pushed the current linux-linaro tree > to git://git.linaro.org/kernel/linux-linaro-tracking.git , linux-linaro > branch. > > This is still work in progress, and it misses few topics. But due to limited > access to hardware at th

[PATCH 1/2] Improve the way we check for running binaries

The current way we are check for running process may lead to wrong results. The 'ps | grep' command may return more than one line, which will cause a false result in the test comparison. Now we use 'pidof' to check if we have the process running. Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin --- thermal/therm

[PATCH 0/2] Couple of fixes for thermal test scripts

Hello Amit, I noticed that the current scripts may be missing some of the thermal objects. Also some tests were failing because of the manipulation of the 'ps' command output. They have been tested on panda board and with these two patches, I see the pass rate much higher. Eduardo Valentin (2):

[PATCH 2/2] thermal_functions: simplify the search for objects

This patch simplifies the way we search for objects inside the thermal sysfs tree. In some cases, the current code is not listing all expected objects. With this simplification, all objects are now listed. Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin --- include/thermal_functions.sh | 24 ++

Re: Preliminary 12.04 linux-linaro kernel tree

On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 3:04 AM, Andy Green wrote: > On 04/18/2012 06:16 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said: > > Hi - > > > I've pushed the current linux-linaro tree > > to git://git.linaro.org/kernel/linux-linaro-tracking.git , linux-linaro > > branch. > > > > This is still work in pr

Re: [PATCH] ARM: imx: Fix imx5 idle logic bug

On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 09:11:32AM -0500, Rob Lee wrote: > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 3:10 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 06:37:48PM -0500, Robert Lee wrote: > >> The imx5_idle() check of the tzic_eanble_wake() return value uses > >> incorrect (inverted) logic causing all attempt

Re: Preliminary 12.04 linux-linaro kernel tree

Hi Tixy, On 04/18/2012 01:28 PM, Tushar Behera wrote: > Hi Tixy, > > On 04/18/2012 01:24 PM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: >> On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 02:16 +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote: >>> Greetings, >>> >>> I've pushed the current linux-linaro tree >>> to git://git.linaro.org/kernel/linux-linaro-tr

Re: Preliminary 12.04 linux-linaro kernel tree

Hi Tixy, On 04/18/2012 01:24 PM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 02:16 +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote: >> Greetings, >> >> I've pushed the current linux-linaro tree >> to git://git.linaro.org/kernel/linux-linaro-tracking.git , linux-linaro >> branch. > > This fails to build for

Re: Preliminary 12.04 linux-linaro kernel tree

On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 02:16 +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote: > Greetings, > > I've pushed the current linux-linaro tree > to git://git.linaro.org/kernel/linux-linaro-tracking.git , linux-linaro > branch. This fails to build for vexpress because the Samsung Mali topic defaults to enabling Mali and