Re: [ANN] Disk upgrade on ci.linaro.org today

2012-05-09 Thread Paul Sokolovsky
Hello John, On Wed, 9 May 2012 09:29:01 -0600 John Rigby wrote: > Paul, > > Not sure if it has anything to do with the upgrade but I am not able > to create new jobs, I tried with and without the copy existing > option. > > https://pastebin.linaro.org/529/ Yes, apparently it is related, than

[PATCH] ARM: imx: Modify IMX_IO_P2V macro

2012-05-09 Thread Robert Lee
A change is needed in the IMX_IO_P2V macro to allow all imx5 platforms to use common definitions when accessing registers of peripherals on the AIPS2 bus. This change was tested for mapping conflicts using the iop2v script found at git://git.pengutronix.de/git/ukl/imx-iop2v.git and by performing a

Re: [PATCH 0/2] OMAP: mailbox initial device tree support

2012-05-09 Thread Omar Ramirez Luna
Hi Vaibhav, Somehow I missed this mail. On 2 May 2012 00:42, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote: > Hi Omar, > > On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 23:17:38, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote: >> To allow mailbox driver to function with device tree. >> >> Tested in OMAP4 and OMAP3. OMAP2 untested. >> > > I think the mailbox code n

Re: Linaro recommended (tm) brand of SD card?

2012-05-09 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Tuesday 08 May 2012, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > On Tue, 8 May 2012 16:30:05 +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: > > > > I think following any SD card brand for quality is a losing > > proposition. Every brand sources chips wherever they cheapest get, and > > thus what is inside the package changes fr

Re: [ANN] Disk upgrade on ci.linaro.org today

2012-05-09 Thread John Rigby
Paul, Not sure if it has anything to do with the upgrade but I am not able to create new jobs, I tried with and without the copy existing option. https://pastebin.linaro.org/529/ --john On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Paul Sokolovsky wrote: > On Wed, 9 May 2012 12:53:15 +0300 > Paul Sokolovsk

Re: [ANN] Disk upgrade on ci.linaro.org today

2012-05-09 Thread Paul Sokolovsky
On Wed, 9 May 2012 12:53:15 +0300 Paul Sokolovsky wrote: > Hello, > > The Infrastructure team works on improving disk layout on Jenkins > build systems to avoid common cases of errors which lead to unexpected > downtime. We recently migrated android-build.linaro.org to new > partition setup, and

new IRC channel: linaro-lava

2012-05-09 Thread Andy Doan
We have a new channel on FreeNode for LAVA specific discussions: #linaro-lava This channel allows participants who are working with Linaro to join and just follow progress on LAVA. We should be using the same guidelines for deciding whether something belongs on #linaro or not as channels li

Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] ARM: imx: Add imx5 cpuidle driver

2012-05-09 Thread Rob Lee
Sascha, On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 3:02 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 04:16:46PM -0500, Robert Lee wrote: >> Add imx5 cpuidle driver. >> >> Signed-off-by: Robert Lee >> --- >>  arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx5.c |   42 >> +++--- >>  1 file changed, 3

[PATCH 0/2] ARM: S3C64xx: cpuidle cleanups

2012-05-09 Thread Daniel Lezcano
These couple of patches use the new cpuidle core api to refactor some part of the code. The first one declares the states directly in the driver declaration and the second one use the timekeeping flag to let the cpuidle core to compute the idle time. I don't have this board, I was not able to test

[PATCH 2/2] ARM: s3c64xx: cpuidle - use timekeeping wrapper

2012-05-09 Thread Daniel Lezcano
The timekeeping is computed from the cpuidle core if we set the .en_core_tk_irqen flag. Let's use it and remove the duplicated code. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano --- arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/cpuidle.c | 12 +--- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mac

[PATCH 1/2] ARM: s3c64xx: cpuidle - declare the states with the new api

2012-05-09 Thread Daniel Lezcano
The states are now part of the cpuidle_driver structure, so we can declare the states in this structure directly. That saves us an extra variable declaration and a memcpy. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano --- arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/cpuidle.c | 33 ++--- 1 files changed,

Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/2] ARM: OMAP2+: nand: Make board_onenand_init() visible to board code

2012-05-09 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 1:16 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Javier Martinez Canillas [120427 02:33]: >> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Enric Balletbò i Serra >> wrote: >> > >> > Tony, as this is a fix ,may be included ? >> > >> > Acked-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra >> > Tested-by: Enric Balletbo i

[PATCH] ARM: EXYNOS: PD: Fix duplicate variable

2012-05-09 Thread Sangwook Lee
struct generic_pm_domain already has a field for name. Use that field instead of creating another field in struct exynos_pm_domain Signed-off-by: Sangwook Lee --- arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm_domains.c |7 +++ 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos

Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] thermal: exynos: Add kernel thermal support for exynos platform

2012-05-09 Thread Amit Kachhap
On 9 May 2012 01:36, Zhang, Rui wrote: > Hi, Amit, > > Sorry for the late response as I'm in a travel recently. > > I think the generic cpufreq cooling patches are good. > > But about the THERMAL_TRIP_STATE_INSTANCE patch, what I'd like to see is that > 1. from thermal zone point of view, when the

RE: [PATCH] ARM: exynos: Adapt to cpuidle core time keeping and irq enable

2012-05-09 Thread Kukjin Kim
Daniel Lezcano wrote: > > On 05/09/2012 01:53 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > amit kachhap wrote: > >> > >> Hi Mr Kukjin, > >> > >> Any comment or update about this patch? > >> > > I'm not sure we don't need to check the idle_time? > > Others, looks ok to me. > > Hi, > > may be I misunderstood your qu

Re: [PATCH] ARM: exynos: Adapt to cpuidle core time keeping and irq enable

2012-05-09 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On 05/09/2012 01:53 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote: amit kachhap wrote: Hi Mr Kukjin, Any comment or update about this patch? I'm not sure we don't need to check the idle_time? Others, looks ok to me. Hi, may be I misunderstood your question but the behavior is not changed here, just the code is r

RE: [PATCH] ARM: exynos: Adapt to cpuidle core time keeping and irq enable

2012-05-09 Thread Kukjin Kim
amit kachhap wrote: > > Hi Mr Kukjin, > > Any comment or update about this patch? > I'm not sure we don't need to check the idle_time? Others, looks ok to me. Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim , Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. > Regards, >

[ANN] Disk upgrade on ci.linaro.org today

2012-05-09 Thread Paul Sokolovsky
Hello, The Infrastructure team works on improving disk layout on Jenkins build systems to avoid common cases of errors which lead to unexpected downtime. We recently migrated android-build.linaro.org to new partition setup, and would like to proceed with ci.linaro.org. This is potentially multi-s

Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] thermal: exynos: Register the tmu sensor with the kernel thermal layer

2012-05-09 Thread Amit Kachhap
On 9 May 2012 01:46, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue,  8 May 2012 21:48:17 +0530 > Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote: > >> This code added creates a link between temperature sensors, linux thermal >> framework and cooling devices for samsung exynos platform. This layer >> monitors the temperature from the

Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] thermal: Add generic cpufreq cooling implementation

2012-05-09 Thread Amit Kachhap
On 9 May 2012 01:46, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue,  8 May 2012 21:48:14 +0530 > Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote: > >> This patch adds support for generic cpu thermal cooling low level >> implementations using frequency scaling up/down based on the registration >> parameters. Different cpu related cool

Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] ARM: imx: Add imx5 cpuidle driver

2012-05-09 Thread Sascha Hauer
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 04:16:46PM -0500, Robert Lee wrote: > Add imx5 cpuidle driver. > > Signed-off-by: Robert Lee > --- > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx5.c | 42 +++--- > 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-im