Daniel Lezcano wrote:
These couple of patches use the new cpuidle core api to refactor
some part of the code. The first one declares the states directly
in the driver declaration and the second one use the timekeeping
flag to let the cpuidle core to compute the idle time.
Basically, looks
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Andy Green andy.gr...@linaro.org wrote:
On 16/05/12 19:49, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
On 14 May 2012 16:12, Andy Greenandy.gr...@linaro.org wrote:
On 14/05/12 20:53, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
On 14/05/12 20:45, Somebody in
Hello all,
I'm interesting in obtaining perf.data files recorded on a different ARM boards.
For those who has no ideas about what is it, you may take a quick look at
https://perf.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Main_Page. If you're able to use
apt-get or other ways to install a few packages on your
On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 07:42 +0800, Andy Green wrote:
Just curious... how many LTs have Mali stuff? If it's more than one, we
should perhaps be talking about moving it to linux-linaro-core-tracking.
We have two teams with three different versions of the driver ;-) with,
I suspect, custom
On 17 May 2012 08:37, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) t...@linaro.org wrote:
On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 07:42 +0800, Andy Green wrote:
Just curious... how many LTs have Mali stuff? If it's more than one, we
should perhaps be talking about moving it to linux-linaro-core-tracking.
We have two teams with
On 17/05/12 15:37, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 07:42 +0800, Andy Green wrote:
Just curious... how many LTs have Mali stuff? If it's more than one, we
should perhaps be talking about moving it to linux-linaro-core-tracking.
We have two teams with three
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 03:39:14PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 15:32 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 19:48 +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
for ppc64(record) vs x86_64(report) I got following report on latest tip:
[jolsa@dhcp-26-214 test]$ ../perf
On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 09:19 +0100, Sangwook Lee wrote:
Is there any plan to push ARM driver into the mainline ?
I'm not aware of any plans.
--
Tixy
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
On 05/11/2012 01:04 AM, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
Samsung:
topic/base topic/core topic/bl topic/dt topic/fb topic/pd
topic/s2ram topic/asv_cpufreq topic/led topic/dummy_reg
topic/gadget topic/touch topic/wlan topic/audio topic/hdmi
topic/mali topic/cma_v24 topic/android_config
On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 23:34 +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
Greetings,
So far I wasn't updating the linux-linaro tree since the 12.04 release.
(The generic topic updates were being done to the
linux-linaro-core-tracking tree)
Now it is time to move the focus to the linux-linaro tree. For
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 04:06:17PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
The timekeeping is computed from the cpuidle core if we set
the .en_core_tk_irqen flag. Let's use it and remove the duplicated
code.
Tested-by: Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 04:06:16PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
The states are now part of the cpuidle_driver structure, so we can
declare the states in this structure directly. That saves us an extra
variable declaration and a memcpy.
Tested-by: Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com
On 12-05-17 03:37 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 07:42 +0800, Andy Green wrote:
Just curious... how many LTs have Mali stuff? If it's more than one, we
should perhaps be talking about moving it to linux-linaro-core-tracking.
We have two teams with three different
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Scott Bambrough
scott.bambro...@linaro.org wrote:
On 12-05-17 03:37 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 07:42 +0800, Andy Green wrote:
Just curious... how many LTs have Mali stuff? If it's more than one, we
should perhaps be talking about
Andy,
Have you or Ryan been able to apply my patch?
Thanks,
Doug
-Original Message-
From: linaro-dev-boun...@lists.linaro.org [mailto:linaro-dev-
boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of Andy Green
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 9:01 AM
To: Linaro Dev
Subject: Fwd: Re: FW: STM Drviers
On 17/05/12 21:26, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Scott Bambrough
scott.bambro...@linaro.org wrote:
On 12-05-17 03:37 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 07:42 +0800, Andy Green wrote:
Just curious... how many LTs have Mali
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Sascha Hauer s.ha...@pengutronix.de wrote:
Hi Robert,
Overall this looks ok now, some comments inline.
Sascha
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 09:33:32PM -0500, Robert Lee wrote:
The imx5 idle code that existed in mm-imx5.c is moved to pm-imx5.c.
The imx5_pm_init
On 17/05/12 17:41, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 23:34 +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
Greetings,
So far I wasn't updating the linux-linaro tree since the 12.04 release.
(The generic topic updates were being done to the
linux-linaro-core-tracking tree)
Now it
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Andy Green andy.gr...@linaro.org wrote:
On 17/05/12 21:26, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Scott Bambrough
scott.bambro...@linaro.org wrote:
On 12-05-17 03:37 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
On Thu, 2012-05-17 at
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Sascha Hauer s.ha...@pengutronix.de wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 09:33:33PM -0500, Robert Lee wrote:
Add various functionality needed to enable a imx53 low power idle
state. This includes adding the imx53 gpc_dvfs clock and making a
common imx5_late_init
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Sascha Hauer s.ha...@pengutronix.de wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 09:33:34PM -0500, Robert Lee wrote:
Add common cpuidle init functionality that can be used by various
imx platforms.
Signed-off-by: Robert Lee rob@linaro.org
---
+
+#ifdef
On 17/05/12 22:44, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Andy Greenandy.gr...@linaro.org wrote:
On 17/05/12 21:26, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Scott Bambrough
scott.bambro...@linaro.orgwrote:
On
On 05/17/2012 06:40 PM, Andy Green wrote:
On 17/05/12 17:41, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 23:34 +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
Greetings,
So far I wasn't updating the linux-linaro tree since the 12.04 release.
(The generic topic updates were being done to
On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 22:40 +0800, Andy Green wrote:
On 17/05/12 17:41, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 23:34 +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
Greetings,
So far I wasn't updating the linux-linaro tree since the 12.04 release.
(The generic topic updates
On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 18:59 +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
Have pushed to the linux-linaro some time ago
Thanks Andrey.
--
Tixy
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
On 17/05/12 23:01, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 22:40 +0800, Andy Green wrote:
On 17/05/12 17:41, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 23:34 +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
Greetings,
So far I wasn't updating the linux-linaro
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 09:46:21AM -0500, Rob Lee wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Sascha Hauer s.ha...@pengutronix.de wrote:
+void __init imx5_init_late(void)
+{
+ imx5_pm_init();
+}
+
void __init imx51_init_late(void)
{
mx51_neon_fixup();
-
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 09:34:26AM -0500, Rob Lee wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Sascha Hauer s.ha...@pengutronix.de wrote:
Hi Robert,
Overall this looks ok now, some comments inline.
+ return ret;
+
+ if (cpu_is_mx51())
+
On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 15:32 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 19:48 +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
for ppc64(record) vs x86_64(report) I got following report on latest tip:
[jolsa@dhcp-26-214 test]$ ../perf report report.target
Endianness of raw data not corrected!
On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 15:08 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:58:23PM -0400, Steven Rostedt escreveu:
On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 11:59 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Was the kernel trace events infrastructure designed with that in
mind? I.e. cross
On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 11:59 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Steve,
Was the kernel trace events infrastructure designed with that in
mind? I.e. cross analysis? I must be missing something here, still
ENOCOFFEE :-\
Yes, the libparsevents library was design for this from day one.
On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 09:10 +0400, Dmitry Antipov wrote:
On 05/16/2012 08:58 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 11:59 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Steve,
Was the kernel trace events infrastructure designed with that in
mind? I.e. cross analysis? I must be
On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 19:48 +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
for ppc64(record) vs x86_64(report) I got following report on latest tip:
[jolsa@dhcp-26-214 test]$ ../perf report report.target
Endianness of raw data not corrected!
Warning:
718 samples with id not present in the header
Warning:
The
Em Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:58:23PM -0400, Steven Rostedt escreveu:
On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 11:59 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Was the kernel trace events infrastructure designed with that in
mind? I.e. cross analysis? I must be missing something here, still
ENOCOFFEE :-\
Yes,
Hey Andrey, Zach,
So I'm back from my vacation, and have found that the Android team
has released a -compat tree for their 3.4 kernel. Basically this tree
re-adds some items like earlysuspend and classic wakelocks in order to
provide better compatibility with old (and by old, I really
On 17 May 2012 20:49, John Stultz john.stu...@linaro.org wrote:
Hey Andrey, Zach,
So I'm back from my vacation, and have found that the Android team has
released a -compat tree for their 3.4 kernel. Basically this tree re-adds
some items like earlysuspend and classic wakelocks in order to
On 18/05/12 09:49, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
Hey Andrey, Zach,
So I'm back from my vacation, and have found that the Android team has
released a -compat tree for their 3.4 kernel. Basically this tree
re-adds some items like earlysuspend and classic wakelocks in order to
provide
On 05/17/2012 03:48 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
trace-cmd copies the entire /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events directory
into the data file (well it copies only the events you specify).
I thought perf did the same. It should be using what's in the perf.dat
file and not what's on the host.
I found
38 matches
Mail list logo
