Dear Minkyu,
On 7 December 2012 13:19, Minkyu Kang wrote:
> Dear Chander,
>
> On 02/11/12 19:51, Chander Kashyap wrote:
>> ping
>>
>> On 2 October 2012 15:16, Chander Kashyap wrote:
>>> This patch series popultes Register addresses, clock structure and
>>> gpio structure for Exynos4x12.
>>>
>>>
https://wiki.linaro.org/projects/big.LITTLE.MP
Roadmap Cards
==
http://cards.linaro.org/browse/CARD-190
The card has been accepted by the TSC and has moved to the
engineering state with development going full speed.
A big.LITTLE update was presented to the TSC to share the current
Postmortem and lessons learned for Linaro's release 2012.11
https://wiki.linaro.org/Cycles/1211/Release/Review
Highlights and Key Successes
http://www.linaro.org/downloads/1211
http://wiki.linaro.org/Cycles/1211/Release#Release_Information
Linaro continues with our
On 6 December 2012 17:31, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> [discussion not relevant to this reply removed]
>>
>> Liviu,
>>
>> I'm just saying that the use case above can't happen because the
>> fields are not updated by thread but by scheduler and it can't be
>> pre-empted by a thread while updating them. We
[discussion not relevant to this reply removed]
>
> Liviu,
>
> I'm just saying that the use case above can't happen because the
> fields are not updated by thread but by scheduler and it can't be
> pre-empted by a thread while updating them. We can have the situation
> where cpu A updates its fie
On 6 December 2012 14:46, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 12:25:21PM +, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> On 6 December 2012 13:06, Liviu Dudau wrote:
>> > On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 11:50:15AM +, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> >> On 6 December 2012 11:27, Liviu Dudau wrote:
>> >> > On Thu,
On 6 December 2012 15:36, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 6 December 2012 19:36, Amit Kucheria wrote:
>> Even if that is the case, I'm afraid I don't quite like the way this was
>> done. IMHO, you shouldn't just revert bits of another author's patches that
>> you don't agree with.
>>
>> If there are iss
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 02:06:30PM +, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Liviu Dudau
> mailto:liviu.du...@arm.com>> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 11:50:15AM +, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > On 6 December 2012 11:27, Liviu Dudau
> > mailto:liviu.du...@arm.com>> wrote:
>
On 6 December 2012 19:36, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> Even if that is the case, I'm afraid I don't quite like the way this was
> done. IMHO, you shouldn't just revert bits of another author's patches that
> you don't agree with.
>
> If there are issues regarding the the patches from Vincent, I'd do the
Put you on CC, Arnd, in case you missed this on list.
Am Samstag, 1. Dezember 2012 schrieb Martin Steigerwald:
> I am not subscribed to linaro-dev, so please Cc me in case you drop
> flashbench-results mailinglist from receivers.
>
>
> Hi Arnd, hi everyone!
>
> For now quick and short.
>
> A s
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 11:50:15AM +, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > On 6 December 2012 11:27, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 09:32:11AM +, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > >> Hi Vincent,
> > >>
> > >> On 6 December 2012 14:50, Vi
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 12:25:21PM +, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On 6 December 2012 13:06, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 11:50:15AM +, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> >> On 6 December 2012 11:27, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 09:32:11AM +, Viresh Kumar wrot
On 6 December 2012 13:06, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 11:50:15AM +, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> On 6 December 2012 11:27, Liviu Dudau wrote:
>> > On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 09:32:11AM +, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> >> Hi Vincent,
>> >>
>> >> On 6 December 2012 14:50, Vincent Guitto
Hello Team,
big.LITTLE MP test execution summary is:
High Lights:
* sched_tests test suite has been executed on mphackbox with latest Android
Image.
On Android:
-
Total Tests = 22
Tests Passed = 16
Tests Failed = 6
Bugs have been created for failed test cases.
Pre-built images
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 11:50:15AM +, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On 6 December 2012 11:27, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 09:32:11AM +, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >> Hi Vincent,
> >>
> >> On 6 December 2012 14:50, Vincent Guittot
> >> wrote:
> >> > It's look like you have disabl
On 6 December 2012 11:27, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 09:32:11AM +, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> Hi Vincent,
>>
>> On 6 December 2012 14:50, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> > It's look like you have disabled packing small task in your v13 with
>> > 4a29297
>>
>> It looks like you are re
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 09:32:11AM +, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Hi Vincent,
>
> On 6 December 2012 14:50, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > It's look like you have disabled packing small task in your v13 with 4a29297
>
> It looks like you are referring to an older version of this branch as
> the commit
On 6 December 2012 15:10, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On 6 December 2012 10:32, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> Hi Vincent,
>>
>> On 6 December 2012 14:50, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>>> It's look like you have disabled packing small task in your v13 with 4a29297
>>
>> It looks like you are referring to an olde
On 6 December 2012 10:32, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Hi Vincent,
>
> On 6 December 2012 14:50, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> It's look like you have disabled packing small task in your v13 with 4a29297
>
> It looks like you are referring to an older version of this branch as
> the commit id's
> don't matc
Hi Vincent,
On 6 December 2012 14:50, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> It's look like you have disabled packing small task in your v13 with 4a29297
It looks like you are referring to an older version of this branch as
the commit id's
don't match. Can you please check that again?
> In addition, I don't
On 5 December 2012 12:51, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 5 December 2012 17:10, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
>>> You want me to drop eed72c8 and a1924a4 ? Correct.
>>
>> Yes.
>
> Done. Updated my repo with v13.
Viresh,
It's look like you have disabled packing small task in your v13 with 4a29297
In additi
21 matches
Mail list logo
