Re: [PATCH 0/2] RFC: introduce arch_early_time for early boot timestamps

2013-08-08 Thread Peter Maydell
On 8 August 2013 03:44, Andy Green andy.gr...@linaro.org wrote: These patches give accurate, monotonic timestamps from the very first log entry allowing insight into where the time is going during the whole of the boot process. It's a debug feature like DEBUG_LL, it does not cooperate with

Re: [PATCH 0/2] RFC: introduce arch_early_time for early boot timestamps

2013-08-08 Thread Andy Green
On 8 August 2013 17:35, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote: On 8 August 2013 03:44, Andy Green andy.gr...@linaro.org wrote: These patches give accurate, monotonic timestamps from the very first log entry allowing insight into where the time is going during the whole of the boot

Release Critical Test Result Summary of Calendar Week 32, 2013 for Linaro Android.

2013-08-08 Thread Botao Sun
Calendar Week 32 2013: Here is release critical test result summary for Linaro Android image on following boards: 1) ARM Versatile Express A9; 2) Samsung Arndale; 3) TI Panda 4430; 4) TI Panda 4460; 1. ARM Versatile Express A9 (Column AU):

Re: [PATCH 0/2] RFC: introduce arch_early_time for early boot timestamps

2013-08-08 Thread Peter Maydell
On 8 August 2013 11:23, Andy Green andy.gr...@linaro.org wrote: On 8 August 2013 17:35, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote Can't you put the relevant information into the device tree so that it works on multiplatform kernels? That's the way the kernel's chosen to store its this is

Re: [PATCH 0/2] RFC: introduce arch_early_time for early boot timestamps

2013-08-08 Thread Andy Green
On 8 August 2013 18:50, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote: On 8 August 2013 11:23, Andy Green andy.gr...@linaro.org wrote: On 8 August 2013 17:35, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote Can't you put the relevant information into the device tree so that it works on

Re: [PATCH 0/2] RFC: introduce arch_early_time for early boot timestamps

2013-08-08 Thread Peter Maydell
On 8 August 2013 12:05, Andy Green andy.gr...@linaro.org wrote: I can see how to get it from the flat device tree by adding properties to chosen { } and riding on early_init_dt_scan_chosen() easily enough. From the results I have already I know on this platform that's ~500us after where we

Release Critical Test Result Summary of Calendar Week 32, 2013 for Open Embedded.

2013-08-08 Thread Botao Sun
Calendar Week 32 2013: Here is release critical test result summary for Open Embedded on following configurations: 1) Minimal; 2) LAMP; 3) LEG JAVA ARMv8; 1. Minimal (Column AD): https://docs.google.com/a/linaro.org/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AgB-fT5LL31CdDhwRFBoQ0NZODFFbUsxSHRKUjhBeGc#gid=2 2. LAMP

Re: LSK getting started

2013-08-08 Thread Andrey Konovalov
On 08/05/2013 11:34 PM, Mark Brown wrote: On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 11:23:19PM +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote: # Misc fixes which don't belong to any particular topic: ynk/llct-v3.10-misc-fixes Add cross-build support to tools/lib/lk library The 2nd chunk is still not in the mainline.

Re: LSK getting started

2013-08-08 Thread Mark Brown
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 05:20:46PM +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote: On 08/05/2013 11:34 PM, Mark Brown wrote: These appear to be upstream anyway in one form or another. KBuild: Allow scripts/* to be cross compiled What's the upstreaming status on this? Good question. There are no plans

Re: LSK getting started

2013-08-08 Thread Andrey Konovalov
On 08/08/2013 05:30 PM, Mark Brown wrote: On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 05:20:46PM +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote: On 08/05/2013 11:34 PM, Mark Brown wrote: These appear to be upstream anyway in one form or another. KBuild: Allow scripts/* to be cross compiled What's the upstreaming

Re: LSK getting started

2013-08-08 Thread Mark Brown
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 05:50:57PM +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote: On 08/08/2013 05:30 PM, Mark Brown wrote: Any great reason why not? It doesn't seem particularly controversial or anything and definitely seems useful. Just the patch author is not with Linaro any more. So I am not very

Re: LSK getting started

2013-08-08 Thread Andrey Konovalov
On 08/08/2013 06:04 PM, Mark Brown wrote: On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 05:50:57PM +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote: On 08/08/2013 05:30 PM, Mark Brown wrote: Any great reason why not? It doesn't seem particularly controversial or anything and definitely seems useful. Just the patch author is not