Re: Let's talk about boot loaders

2016-05-06 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 02:03:42PM -0400, Jon Masters wrote: > On 05/06/2016 01:10 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 12:20:40PM -0400, Jon Masters wrote: > > > But is it really worth trying after so long of the right thing not > > > happening? If anyone really cared about making

Re: Let's talk about boot loaders

2016-05-06 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 12:20:40PM -0400, Jon Masters wrote: > But is it really worth trying after so long of the right thing not > happening? If anyone really cared about making general purpose distros boot > on embedded boards, efforts to compel standards would have happened years > ago. To do

Re: Let's talk about boot loaders

2016-05-06 Thread Grant Likely
On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: > > > On 06.05.16 13:03, Grant Likely wrote: >> On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 2:10 AM, Tom Rini wrote: >>> On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 10:21:25PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote: So what's the goal here? Are we

Re: Let's talk about boot loaders

2016-05-06 Thread Alexander Graf
On 06.05.16 13:03, Grant Likely wrote: > On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 2:10 AM, Tom Rini wrote: >> On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 10:21:25PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote: >>> So what's the goal here? Are we trying to force GPT on systems whose >>> vendors never intended them to run with

Re: Let's talk about boot loaders

2016-05-06 Thread Grant Likely
On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 2:10 AM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 10:21:25PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote: >> On 05.05.16 17:21, Grant Likely wrote: >> > On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Marcin Juszkiewicz >> > wrote: >> >> Recently my