On Thursday 23 February 2012 07:26 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 23/02/12 10:27, Aneesh V wrote:
Ok. Agree. I never used to use %function when I wrote assembly
functions earlier. I am sure a lot of code will break if this was
enforced.
If you've not used %function on ARM, then your co
On Thursday 23 February 2012 05:17 PM, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
Aneesh V wrote on 23.02.2012 11:27:40:
The "packed" attribute specifies that all struct elements ought to be
considered to have alignment requirement 1 instead of their default
alignment. Thus the whole struct ends
On Tuesday 21 February 2012 03:27 PM, Dave Martin wrote:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 06:59:53PM +0100, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
"V, Aneesh" wrote:
I agree that not marking the assembly functions ' %function' is a problem
in the code, so it's not a critical bug. But I would've been happier if
the lin
Oops! Sorry. These mails skipped my Inbox and went into a sub-folder
in my mail client that I hadn't used for a long time. I didn't
realize that I had mails!
On Monday 20 February 2012 11:29 PM, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
"V, Aneesh" wrote:
I agree that not marking the assembly functions ' %functi
Hi Dirk,
On Saturday 04 February 2012 02:08 PM, Dirk Behme wrote:
Let's discuss how to enable the i.MX5/6 caches in U-Boot:
On 03.02.2012 12:00, Stefano Babic wrote:
On 03/02/2012 11:18, Dirk Behme wrote:
...
As your concerns are surely related to speed up the boot process, IMHO
we can focu
Hi Ulrich,
On Tuesday 15 March 2011 09:00 PM, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
Aneesh V wrote:
I was trying to build u-boot in Thumb2 for OMAP4. Everything was fine
until I added some patches recently. One of these patches introduced an
API (let's say foo()) that has a weakly linked alias(let&
Hi,
I have an interesting observation that I thought might be interesting
to the tool-chain team.
I was trying to build u-boot in Thumb2 for OMAP4. Everything was fine
until I added some patches recently. One of these patches introduced an
API (let's say foo()) that has a weakly linked alias(let
Hi Andy,
On Tuesday 08 February 2011 07:12 PM, Andy Green wrote:
On 02/08/11 13:23, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
Hi -
Would you please take a look at this patch in our internal tree.
It seems to be fixing the same issue. I faced exactly same problem on
Blaze.
http://dev.omapzoo
Hi Anand,
On Tuesday 08 February 2011 05:20 PM, Anand Gadiyar wrote:
[snip..]
The roadmap for x-loader is this:
- There is ongoing work (from Aneesh and others) to build an x-loader
equivalent out of u-boot.
--- This is currently done for OMAP4 alone, but OMAP3 and others will
take quit
Hi Andy,
On Tuesday 08 February 2011 03:11 PM, Andy Green wrote:
From: Andy Green
When the OMAP 4 on Panda sees that USB OTG external power is present,
it changes the boot flow in the ROM to try to boot via that before
trying MMC1. If it isn't satisfied, it falls through to try MMC1.
Without
Hi Steve,
On Monday 07 February 2011 11:07 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 03:59:06PM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
Since we only really support developer platform hosts with the tools
ppa enabled, could we improve l-m-c to print a warning if that ppa
isn't enabled?
The othe
Hi All,
Thanks for the quick help. qemu update helped me. Maybe, I should have
read the README more carefully.
Thanks,
Aneesh
On Monday 07 February 2011 08:54 PM, Matt Waddel wrote:
Hi Aneesh
On 02/07/2011 07:25 AM, Aneesh V wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to prepare an MMC card to boot up Panda
Hi,
I am trying to prepare an MMC card to boot up Panda with Linaro daily
build image.
I downloaded linaro-image-tools from:
https://launchpad.net/linaro-image-tools
I installed all dependencies mentioned in the README and tried to run
linaro-media-create like below:
sudo ./linaro-media-create
13 matches
Mail list logo
