Re: Perf failure on linux-linaro

On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:46:26AM +0100, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 10:29 +0100, Dave Martin wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 03:50:38PM +0530, Tushar Behera wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Arndale board, perf works well on llct a

Re: Gator with IKS config but not running on big.LITTLE

On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 12:08:49PM +0100, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 12:14 +0800, Andy Green wrote: > > Hi - > > > > Something maybe unrelated after inserting gator successfully get > > some kernel logs coming > > > > [ 52.491528] CPU PMU: unable to set irq affinity

Re: Perf failure on linux-linaro

On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 03:50:38PM +0530, Tushar Behera wrote: > Hi, > > On Arndale board, perf works well on llct as well as Samsung topic > tree[1], but fails on linux-linaro[2]. Git bisect points to commit > 6fea652c638e "ARM: perf: [WIP] Add register emulation for offline ARMv7 > PMUs". > > I

Re: Tiny BL switcher compatibility issue with PMU on non-BL SoC

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:21:07PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Thu, 30 May 2013, Dave Martin wrote: > > > So, the problem is the hacked DT bindings we're using for vexpress, > > which aren't compatible with upstream -- the perf changes assume > > thes

Re: Tiny BL switcher compatibility issue with PMU on non-BL SoC

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 06:58:53PM +0800, Andy Green wrote: > On 30/05/13 18:50, the mail apparently from Dave Martin included: > >On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:06:20AM +0800, Andy Green wrote: > >>Hi - > >> > >>We're using one kernel binary with BL Switcher e

Re: Tiny BL switcher compatibility issue with PMU on non-BL SoC

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:06:20AM +0800, Andy Green wrote: > Hi - > > We're using one kernel binary with BL Switcher enabled in config, > but able to work on SoC without Big Little. > > This is OK except where the BL patches touch the PMU driver. It > makes an assumption about BL configured ==

Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: arm_big_little: pass target residency to mcpm

On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 02:08:29PM -0700, Sebastian Capella wrote: > Thanks Liviu! > > Some comments below.. > > Quoting Liviu Dudau (2013-05-21 10:15:42) > > ... Which side of the interface are you actually thinking of? > > Both, I'm really just trying to understand the problem. > > > I don't

Re: [BUG] v7_coherent_kern_range broken on big.LITTLE

On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 12:43:52PM +, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > [dropped ALKML, added Pawel] > > On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 12:06:25PM +, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > > On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 10:33 +, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:04:37AM +, Jon Medhurst (T

Re: [kvmarm] [PATCH] bootwrapper: CPU hotplug aware boot protocol

On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 12:23:48PM +, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 15:54 +, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > > On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 10:10 -0500, Christoffer Dall wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 3:49 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) > > > wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2012-12-13 at

Re: [PATCH RESEND] xen/arm: use the __HVC macro

On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 04:26:08PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > Use the new __HVC macro in hypercall.S. > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini This is correct usage of the __HVC() macro, so Acked-by: Dave Martin > --- > arch/arm/xen/hypercall.S | 14 +- >

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] bootwrapper: Add support for big.LITTLE models

On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 01:31:55PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 8 October 2012 14:59, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > > This mostly boils down to initialising the Cache Coherent Interconnect > > (CCI). We do this by looking in the device-tree for a CCI node, that way > > the same semihosting boot

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] bootwrapper: Allow for multiple clusters in boot CPU detection

The chance of us wanting to do that (motivating bic instead of bfc) is minimal, though. Acked-by: Dave Martin > > Signed-off-by: Jon Medhurst > --- > boot.S |2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/boot.S b/boot.S > index 727119a..40e

Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] bootwrapper: Initialise CCI device if found in the fdt

configure_from_fdt() > which will look in the fdt for devices to initialise. In this first case > we look for the CCI node and if found then setup this device. Acked-by: Dave Martin (Commentary below, but the patch looks OK to me.) > > Signed-off-by: Jon Medhurst

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] bootwrapper: Factor out parsing of fdt #address-cells and #size-cells

On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 02:59:18PM +0100, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > From: Jon Medhurst > > A subsequent patch will also need to obtain address-cells and > size-cells, so lets factor out this code into a handy function. The code looks ok. There are a couple of stylistic things that could be t

[RFC PATCH] bootwrapper: Add --secure option to boot the kernel in the Secure world

Currently, the bootwrapper switches unconditionally to NS Hyp mode, which prevents successful execution of a kernel which expects to start in the Secure world. This patch adds a --secure command-line option to enable Secure world booting. NS HYP remains the default. Signed-off-by: Dave Martin

Re: [PATCH 3/3] bootwrapper: Initialise CCI device if found in the fdt

On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 12:30:54PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: > On 1 October 2012 19:33, Dave Martin wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 07:06:20PM +0100, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > >> + /* Turn on CCI snoops and DVM messages */ > >> + io32(cci+0x40

Re: [PATCH 3/3] bootwrapper: Initialise CCI device if found in the fdt

On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 06:03:54PM +0100, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > On Mon, 2012-10-01 at 17:33 +0100, Dave Martin wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 07:06:20PM +0100, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > > > + if (offset >= 0) { > > > + p = fdt_ge

Re: [PATCH 2/3] bootwrapper: Factor out parsing of fdt #address-cells and #size-cells

On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 06:36:57PM +0100, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > On Mon, 2012-10-01 at 17:35 +0100, Dave Martin wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 07:06:19PM +0100, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > > > From: Jon Medhurst > > > > > > We will be reusing this

Re: [PATCH 1/3] bootwrapper: Allow for multiple clusters in boot CPU detection

On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 07:06:18PM +0100, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > From: Jon Medhurst > > Check all the CPU affinity fields of MPIDR, so we select only > the first CPU of the first cluster as the one to boot on. This seems reasonable. The bfc could be a bic, but we only care about ARMv7 her

Re: [PATCH 2/3] bootwrapper: Factor out parsing of fdt #address-cells and #size-cells

On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 07:06:19PM +0100, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > From: Jon Medhurst > > We will be reusing this functionality later. Commit message? ;) Makes sense to factor this out, though. Cheers ---Dave > Signed-off-by: Jon Medhurst > --- > semi_loader.c | 56 +++

Re: [PATCH 3/3] bootwrapper: Initialise CCI device if found in the fdt

On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 07:06:20PM +0100, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > From: Jon Medhurst > > The A15xA7 models simulate a Cache Coherent Interconnect (CCI) and this > needs to be initialised correctly for Linux to boot. > > To perform this initiation we add the new function configure_from_fdt()

Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] bootwrapper: Delay switch to Hyp mode until kernel entry

On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 01:22:14PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 26 September 2012 18:08, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 16:01 +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > >> The patch has added an 'enter_hyp' > >> call into the chunk of code which is relocated to some random > >> addre

Re: fastmodel run over ubuntu 64bit machine

On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 04:58:21PM -0500, Andy Doan wrote: > On 09/17/2012 04:01 AM, Dave Pigott wrote: > >Hi Lei, > > > >I'm copying Andy Doan directly on this, since he's had more experience > >of getting FM working in LAVA and can probably point you in the right > >direction. > > > >Thanks > > >

Re: [PATCH v4 06/24] docs: Xen ARM DT bindings

c; > > >>> - update reg property using 2 address-cells and 2 size-cells. > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini > > >>> CC: devicetree-disc...@lists.ozlabs.org > > >>> CC: David Vrabel > >

Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] ARM: topology: Update cpu_power according to DT information

On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 11:27:04AM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote: > Use cpu compatibility field and clock-frequency field of DT to > estimate the capacity of each core of the system and to update > the cpu_power field accordingly. > This patch enables to put more running tasks on big cores than > on

Re: [PATCH v3 06/25] docs: Xen ARM DT bindings

On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 09:34:28PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > On 09/12/2012 01:14 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > >> On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Rob Herring wrote: > >>> You should look at ePAPR 1.1 which defines hypervisor related bindings. > >>> While

Re: [PATCH v3 06/25] docs: Xen ARM DT bindings

On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 07:14:58PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Rob Herring wrote: > > > You should look at ePAPR 1.1 which defines hypervisor related bindings. > > > While it is a PPC doc, we should reuse or extend what

[PATCH v2 0/3] Delay switch to Non-Secure Hyp until kernel entry

least reaches the kernel now. Cheers ---Dave Dave Martin (3): bootwrapper: Fix misaligned Hyp mode vector table bootwrapper: Refactor entry into Hyp mode to be more reusable bootwrapper: Delay switch to Hyp mode until kernel ent

[PATCH v2 2/3] bootwrapper: Refactor entry into Hyp mode to be more reusable

* Split Hyp mode entry out into a separate macro. * hvc now jumps back to the caller in Hyp mode instead of branching to a fixed label. Signed-off-by: Dave Martin --- boot.S | 23 +++ 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/boot.S b/boot.S

[PATCH v2 1/3] bootwrapper: Fix misaligned Hyp mode vector table

Currently, it looks like we rely on luck in order to fall through to the correct vector when a Hyp Trap exception occurs. This patch aligns the Hyp mode vector table explicitly to a 32-byte boundary, as required by the architecture. Signed-off-by: Dave Martin --- boot.S | 24

[PATCH v2 3/3] bootwrapper: Delay switch to Hyp mode until kernel entry

Signed-off-by: Dave Martin --- boot.S| 15 +-- semi_loader.h |6 -- 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/boot.S b/boot.S index 128f74e..fe7acdf 100644 --- a/boot.S +++ b/boot.S @@ -96,8 +96,6 @@ start: mov r7, #0xfff0

[RFC PATCH 0/3] Delay switch to Non-Secure Hyp until kernel entry

eview also welcome (naturally) Cheers ---Dave Dave Martin (3): bootwrapper: Fix misaligned Hyp mode vector table bootwrapper: Refactor entry into Hyp mode to be more reusable bootwrapper: Delay switch to Hyp mode until kernel entry boot.S

[RFC PATCH 3/3] bootwrapper: Delay switch to Hyp mode until kernel entry

Signed-off-by: Dave Martin --- boot.S| 15 +-- semi_loader.h |6 -- 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/boot.S b/boot.S index 128f74e..8ab68ba 100644 --- a/boot.S +++ b/boot.S @@ -96,8 +96,6 @@ start: mov r7, #0xfff0

[RFC PATCH 2/3] bootwrapper: Refactor entry into Hyp mode to be more reusable

* Split Hyp mode entry out into a separate macro. * hvc now jumps back to the caller in Hyp mode instead of branching to a fixed label. Signed-off-by: Dave Martin --- boot.S | 23 +++ 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/boot.S b/boot.S

[RFC PATCH 1/3] bootwrapper: Fix misaligned Hyp mode vector table

Currently, it looks like we rely on luck in order to fall through to the correct vector when a Hyp Trap exception occurs. This patch aligns the Hyp mode vector table explicitly to a 32-byte boundary, as required by the architecture. Signed-off-by: Dave Martin --- boot.S | 24

Re: [PATCH] bootwrapper: Use local definition of string.h

On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 04:26:32PM +0100, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > On Tue, 2012-09-04 at 16:10 +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > > On 4 September 2012 15:57, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > > > diff --git a/string.h b/string.h > > > new file mode 100644 > > > index 000..f1aebdf > > > --- /dev/nul

Re: New fast models device-tree topic for linux-linaro

On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 05:47:19PM +0100, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > Hi Andrey > > Can you include a new topic to linux-linaro which contains device-tree > files for ARM's fast models? This branch is tracking-armlt-rtsm [1] in > the ARM LT working tree. > > Thanks > > For those interested... >

Re: [PATCH v2 02/23] xen/arm: hypercalls

On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 04:37:24PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Wed, 8 Aug 2012, Dave Martin wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 03:27:05PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > Use r12 to pass the hypercall number to the hypervisor. > > > > > > We n

Re: [PATCH v2 02/23] xen/arm: hypercalls

On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 03:27:05PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > Use r12 to pass the hypercall number to the hypervisor. > > We need a register to pass the hypercall number because we might not > know it at compile time and HVC only takes an immediate argument. > > Among the available regist

Re: [PATCH] arm: Handle device tree memory regions larger than 4GB

On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 10:57:40AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > On 07/07/2012 05:36 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > > On 6 July 2012 20:26, Dave Martin wrote: > >> On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 07:07:35PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > >>> On 6 July 2012 00:27, Rob Herring wro

Re: [PATCH] arm: Handle device tree memory regions larger than 4GB

On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 07:07:35PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 6 July 2012 00:27, Rob Herring wrote: > > I would just change arm_add_memory to use phys_addr_t for the size > > param. This ultimately calls memblock functions which use phys_addr_t > > for sizes. > > So I have a patch that does

Re: Gmail corrupting spaces in plain-text mail?

On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 09:18:36AM -0600, Joey STANFORD wrote: > I did actually. If anyone has any examples of the "plague of question > marks" that we think are caused by this, let me know and I'll add it > to the case. Now I've had a chance to look into this, it seems that the plague of question

Re: Gmail corrupting spaces in plain-text mail?

On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:20:22PM -0400, Amber Graner wrote: > I had this happen as well, when using gmail in Chromium for things that I > would cut and paste; however, it did not happen in Firefox. The way I > worked around it was to use Firefox or barring that I would save the email > as a draf

Re: Gmail corrupting spaces in plain-text mail?

On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:06:54AM -0600, Joey STANFORD wrote: > Not much help but the going work-around is to not use the webmail > interface for this and use mutt, thunderbird, etc. via imap and smtp. > The added advantage there is you can add extensions to linkify bugs > and such for places l

Gmail corrupting spaces in plain-text mail?

to patches via webmail", does anyone know a workaround? Cheers ---Dave - Forwarded message from Dave Martin - MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.19.176 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 08:31:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120321153006.ga2...@linaro.org> References: <201203211

Re: [PATCH-WIP 01/13] xen/arm: use r12 to pass the hypercall number to the hypervisor

On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote: > On 08/03/12 17:21, Nicolas Pitre wrote: >> On Thu, 8 Mar 2012, Richard Earnshaw wrote: >> >>> On 02/03/12 21:15, Nicolas Pitre wrote: So, to me, the gcc documentation is perfectly clear on this topic. there really _is_ a guarantee

Re: [PATCH-WIP 01/13] xen/arm: use r12 to pass the hypercall number to the hypervisor

On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 09:58:23AM +, Richard Earnshaw wrote: > On 02/03/12 21:15, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > [ coming back from vacation and trying to catch up ] > > > > On Wed, 29 Feb 2012, Dave Martin wrote: > > > >> Just had a chat with some tools guys

Re: [PATCH-WIP 01/13] xen/arm: use r12 to pass the hypercall number to the hypervisor

On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 10:10:29AM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:58:26PM +0000, Dave Martin wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 09:56:02AM +, Ian Campbell wrote: > > > On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 09:34 +, Dave Martin wrote: > > > &

Re: [PATCH-WIP 01/13] xen/arm: use r12 to pass the hypercall number to the hypervisor

On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 02:52:38PM +, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Wed, 29 Feb 2012, Dave Martin wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 09:56:02AM +, Ian Campbell wrote: > > > On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 09:34 +, Dave Martin wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 28, 201

Re: [PATCH-WIP 01/13] xen/arm: use r12 to pass the hypercall number to the hypervisor

On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 02:44:24PM +, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 12:58 +0000, Dave Martin wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 09:56:02AM +, Ian Campbell wrote: > > > On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 09:34 +, Dave Martin wrote: > > > > On Tue, Fe

Re: Do ARM Cortex-A9 PMU supoort oprofile

On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:21:58PM +0800, zachary6626 wrote: > Sorry disturbing you! > > I have ask google for do ARM Cortex-A9 PMU supoort oprofile, but it do not > have a answer definitely . > > So i ask you do ARM Cortex-A9 PMU supoort oprofile. > > Can u help me? In general, yes it does wo

Re: [PATCH-WIP 01/13] xen/arm: use r12 to pass the hypercall number to the hypervisor

On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 09:56:02AM +, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 09:34 +0000, Dave Martin wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:28:29PM +, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > > I don't have a very strong opinion on which register we should use, but &

Re: [PATCH-WIP 01/13] xen/arm: use r12 to pass the hypercall number to the hypervisor

On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 09:56:02AM +, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 09:34 +0000, Dave Martin wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:28:29PM +, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > > I don't have a very strong opinion on which register we should use, but &

Re: [PATCH-WIP 01/13] xen/arm: use r12 to pass the hypercall number to the hypervisor

On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:28:29PM +, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 10:20 +0000, Dave Martin wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 07:33:39PM +, Ian Campbell wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2012-02-27 at

Sample big.LITTLE model boot images

Hi all, I've added some detailed info on the wiki about how to go about building bootable images for the big.LITTLE components, here: https://wiki.linaro.org/Internal/Projects/Big.Little.Switcher/ARMFastModelsHowto For the benefit of anyone who can't see that page, I've also pasted it here -- if

Re: [PATCH-WIP 01/13] xen/arm: use r12 to pass the hypercall number to the hypervisor

On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 07:33:39PM +, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 18:03 +0000, Dave Martin wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 04:27:23PM +, Ian Campbell wrote: > > > On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 17:48 +, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > >

Re: [PATCH-WIP 01/13] xen/arm: use r12 to pass the hypercall number to the hypervisor

On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 07:48:45PM +, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 17:53 +0000, Dave Martin wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 05:48:22PM +, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > We need a register to pass the hypercall number because we might not > > >

Re: [PATCH-WIP 01/13] xen/arm: use r12 to pass the hypercall number to the hypervisor

On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 04:27:23PM +, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 17:48 +, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > We need a register to pass the hypercall number because we might not > > know it at compile time and HVC only takes an immediate argument. > > > > Among the available re

Re: [PATCH-WIP 01/13] xen/arm: use r12 to pass the hypercall number to the hypervisor

On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 05:48:22PM +, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > We need a register to pass the hypercall number because we might not > know it at compile time and HVC only takes an immediate argument. > > Among the available registers r12 seems to be the best choice because it > is defined a

Re: ARM A9 oprofile

On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 06:41:22PM +0400, Dmitry Antipov wrote: > On 02/22/2012 05:59 PM, Dave Martin wrote: > > >However, the way that the performance counter interrupts are routed is > >dependent on the SoC. OMAP4 and later have an unusual way of doing this, > >w

Re: ARM A9 oprofile

On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 08:14:11PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Dmitry Antipov > wrote: > > On 02/22/2012 02:57 PM, Ming Lei wrote: > > > >> I didn't use oprofile before and always use 'perf', and I am sure > >> it works well with arm a9 pmu hardware on linus tree. > >

Re: ARM A9 oprofile

On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 02:15:09PM +0400, Dmitry Antipov wrote: > Hello Ming, > > could you please give some pointers to observe an overall status of > oprofile support on ARM A9 cores? IIUC, now it doesn't work Note -- it's important to understand that there's a difference between oprofile/perf

Re: gcc: Thumb interworking and weakly linked functions

On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:05:54PM +0100, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > Andrew Stubbs wrote on 21.02.2012 11:56:07: > > > I'm not sure, but I believe that the compiler requires (prefers) any > > structs that you want included inside packed structs to be themselves > > packed, so you can end up with som

Re: gcc: Thumb interworking and weakly linked functions

On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 06:59:53PM +0100, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > "V, Aneesh" wrote: > > > I agree that not marking the assembly functions ' %function' is a problem > > in the code, so it's not a critical bug. But I would've been happier if > > the linker refused to link it rather than branching

Re: linaro blocking issue

On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 05:27:21AM -0200, Christian Robottom Reis wrote: > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:49:21PM +0530, Amit wrote: > > I am not able to install any packages related to linaro for example > > when I tried that below command > > > > sudo add-apt-repository ppa:linaro-maintainers/toolch

Re: Linaro kernel tree for A15 for daily builds

On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 09:33:35PM +0100, Zygmunt Krynicki wrote: > HI. > > I'm building a LAVA service for running fast models. Quite soon (*) > we'll be ready to open an alpha access. Right now you will need to > bring your own root filesystem and kernel image to use it. With that > in mind I wa

Re: Linaro kernel tree for A15 for daily builds

On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 09:53:21PM +0100, Zygmunt Krynicki wrote: > Hi Zach > > It takes a _long_ while to get to raw serial console login prompt of a > stripped-down ubuntu nano image. On my core i7 (first gen) the > simulator can sometimes reach around 1M instructions per second but is > usually

Re: Finding source code for Linaro kernels

On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 6:52 PM, Zach Pfeffer wrote: > On 25 January 2012 12:18, Dave Martin wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Zach Pfeffer >> wrote: >> >> [...] >> >>> >>> >>> For Android we have: >>> >>&g

Re: Sources for 11.11 kernel release

On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 04:14:10PM -0200, Christian Robottom Reis wrote: > On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 10:50:51AM -0500, Chris Lalancette wrote: > > In terms of finding things in the future, I have to say that there > > is a bit of a forest of git trees in linaro. At the very least, I > > would make s

Re: Sources for 11.11 kernel release

On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 10:50:51AM -0500, Chris Lalancette wrote: > On 01/24/2012 10:01 AM, Christian Robottom Reis wrote: > >On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:59:33PM -0200, Christian Robottom Reis wrote: > >>On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 09:29:34AM -0500, Chris Lalancette wrote: > >>>(I'm aware that there is

Re: Finding source code for Linaro kernels

On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Zach Pfeffer wrote: [...] > > > For Android we have: > > https://android-build.linaro.org/builds/~linaro-android/panda-12.01-release/ > > we should have the same thing for Ubuntu: > > ubuntu-build.linaro.org > > with the similar information. > I'm not sure about

Re: Finding source code for Linaro kernels

from start to end of that process without falling over is minimal, and in my experience, it doesn't happen. I think (hopefully) that my proposal robustly fixes this, but if it can be achieved more easily, I'm eager to know how. Cheers ---Dave > On 24/01/12 10:18, Dave Martin wrot

Re: Finding source code for Linaro kernels

somewhere. Can we then plan to implement it? If anyone has any preference for the common prefix for tag names, please speak up (otherwise we will proceed with the "ubuntu/" prefix). Cheers ---Dave On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 01:32:35PM +0000, Dave Martin wrote: > For everyone who packages

Re: Finding source code for Linaro kernels

On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Zach Pfeffer wrote: > On 13 January 2012 11:36, Dave Martin wrote: >> I was specifically after solving the problem for the debianised >> kernels.  Android is an analogous but completely separate problem -- >> if you already have a solu

Re: Finding source code for Linaro kernels

I was specifically after solving the problem for the debianised kernels. Android is an analogous but completely separate problem -- if you already have a solution there then great. > https://android-build.linaro.org/builds/~linaro-android/staging-origen/#build=142 I assume people can tell from t

Re: Finding source code for Linaro kernels

On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 3:52 PM, John Rigby wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 6:32 AM, Dave Martin wrote: >> For everyone who packages kernel trees: >> >> >> I've had some questions about getting the source for linaro kernel >> packaged, and it seems

Finding source code for Linaro kernels

For everyone who packages kernel trees: I've had some questions about getting the source for linaro kernel packaged, and it seems that this is still not straightforward: Getting the debian package source (i.e., flat tarball) for a binary kernel is possible, but only if it is a non-superseded ver

Re: Slow access to git trees under ftp.arm.linux.org.uk?

On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 10:35:40AM +, James Tunnicliffe wrote: > On 7 December 2011 19:02, Guilherme Salgado > wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 10:34 +, Dave Martin wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 03:22:00PM -0300, Guilherme Salgado wrote: > >> > Hi t

Re: Slow access to git trees under ftp.arm.linux.org.uk?

On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 04:02:19PM -0300, Guilherme Salgado wrote: > On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 10:34 +0000, Dave Martin wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 03:22:00PM -0300, Guilherme Salgado wrote: > > > Hi there, > > > > > > The linux-arm-kernel[1] project on

Re: Slow access to git trees under ftp.arm.linux.org.uk?

On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 03:22:00PM -0300, Guilherme Salgado wrote: > Hi there, > > The linux-arm-kernel[1] project on patches.l.o was using the following source > tree > > http://ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/arm/kernel/git-cur/linux-2.6-arm.git > > to track committed patches, but fetching t

Re: Static Library startup

On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 04:47:08PM +, Richard Sandiford wrote: > Richard Sandiford writes: > > Dave Martin writes: > >> Another way of doing a similar thing is to mark __mylib_constructor > >> as undefined in all the objects that make up the library. > >>

Re: Proposal : New Linaro Desktop Wallpaper

On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 09:35:19AM -0600, Andy Doan wrote: > On 12/02/2011 04:55 AM, Alexander Sack wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Riku Voipio > > wrote: > > > > On 2 December 2011 00:56, Tom Gall > > wrote: > >

Re: Static Library startup

> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 1:40 AM, Tom Gall wrote: > > I probably know the answer to this already but ... > > > > For shared libs one can define and use something like: > > > > void __attribute__ ((constructor)) my_init(void); > > void __attribute__ ((destructor)) my_fini(void); > > > > Which of co

Re: Proposal : New Linaro Desktop Wallpaper

On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 04:56:57PM -0600, Tom Gall wrote: > Hi All, > > one of the blueprints we have for 11.12 is to modify the LEB/ALIP > images so they include more linaro branding. A linaro wallpaper, maybe > a linaro image as the system is booting, that kind of thing. > > Towards that end (a

Re: [EOL] Request for End Of Life - Beagleboard and Beagleboard-xM

On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 7:14 PM, David Zinman wrote: > A request has been received to discontinue Linaro's support for the > Beagleboard and Beagleboard-xM hardware. > > The following conditions will be applied for the 2012.01 release cycle: >  * There will be no more LEB or Linaro Developer builds

-Werror issues in cm-kernel [was: gcc4.6,how to remove werror]

On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 03:31:38PM +0700, tknv wrote: > I could not find that WERROR override code at my kernels... > > Sorry delay it, I did make V=1. > There are three kinds test. > All targets are ARM. > All Makefiles(top of kernel tree)-KBUILD_CFLAGS are same. > KBUILD_CFLAGS := -Wall -Wunde

Re: ANN: New Wiki Theme

On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:22:17AM -0600, Andy Doan wrote: > On 11/16/2011 06:15 AM, Dave Martin wrote: > > I think for the table of links we do need an explanation of what each > > item is, though this should literally just be a few words. > > Thanks for the feedback! &g

Re: ANN: New Wiki Theme

On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 02:28:57PM -0600, Andy Doan wrote: > We just updated wiki.linare.org with a new default theme. In addition > we've created a new front page to the wiki that is intended to make some > of most important links more discoverable. > > Most people should just press refresh to se

Re: linaro-overlay: auto-serial-console clobbers bootup serial port configuration

On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 01:47:13PM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Dave Martin wrote: > > > "Filing" this bug report on linaro-dev for now, so I don't forget it. > > I can't figure out how to file a but a

linaro-overlay: auto-serial-console clobbers bootup serial port configuration

"Filing" this bug report on linaro-dev for now, so I don't forget it. I can't figure out how to file a but against linaro-overlay on launchpad. (Any suggestions?) Cheers ---Dave -- linaro-overlay: auto-serial-console clobbers bootup serial port configuration auto-serial-console makes incorrect

Re: sneak preview of kernel ci views

On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Alexander Sack wrote: > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Dave Martin wrote: >> >> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 01:16:30PM +1300, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > I've done a stealth deploy (stealth a

Re: sneak preview of kernel ci views

On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 01:16:30PM +1300, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > Hi all, > > I've done a stealth deploy (stealth as in "no links point to this page") > of the first cut of the kernel ci view I've been working on: > > http://validation.linaro.org/lava-server/kernel-ci-views/index > > I

Re: Linaro CI hwpack name improvements

On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 03:10:59PM +0530, Deepti Kalakeri wrote: > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Alexander Sack wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Dave Martin wrote: > > > >> > >> Also, what timezone is used to determine the date and time? I t

Re: 11.10 image changes

On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 12:08:46PM -0500, Tom Gall wrote: > All, > > Our oneiric based images and hwpacks are shaping up in advance of the > 11.10 based release. Already you can download from > http://snapshots.linaro.org/oneiric. > > Some important things you'll want to be aware of. > > We'll b

Re: Linaro CI hwpack name improvements

On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 06:57:53PM +0530, Deepti Kalakeri wrote: > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Alexander Sack wrote: [...] > > Example: > > > > http://ci.linaro.org/kernel_hwpack/linux-next_beagle-omap2plus

Re: vexpress and 11.08

On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 03:48:09PM +0100, Pawel Moll wrote: > > So I guess it must be no SATA because of broken PCI, > > True. > > > no MMC because of FPGA bugs (now fixed), > > Work-arounded ;-) (hopefully really fixed in near future). > > > no CF card because of (?). > > CF usability depen

Re: Linaro CI hwpack name improvements

On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 02:22:05PM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote: > On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Loïc Minier wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2011, Deepti Kalakeri wrote: > > > 1) The board on which the hwpack can be booted > > > 2) The hwpack creation timestamp includes the date in mmdd format

All recent hwpack builds on snapshots.linaro.org are failing...

Hi all, does anyone know why all the hwpack builds have started failing? See, for example: http://snapshots.linaro.org/11.05-daily/linaro-hwpacks/panda/20111006/0/build-log.txt ...a similar problem seems to have affected the recent builds for every hwpack. Looks like some build-depends package

Thumb-2 kernel guide now on the wiki

Hi all, For kernel guys and landing teams, I've posted some kernel-specific info on mirating to Thumb-2 here: https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Kernel/Thumb2Guide If your kernel tree isn't building in Thumb-2 yet, please do take a look. Let me know if you want more information on anything, o

Fwd: Cambridge, UK PGP key signing meeting. Thursday 13th Oct

FYI, for people in Cambridge, UK next week Reply to Jonathan Cameron (below) if you are interested in attending. For up-to-date guidelines on creating keys, try this: http://www.debian.org/events/keysigning Cheers ---Dave -- Forwarded message -- From: Ralf Baechle Date: Thu, Oc

  1   2   3   4   >