On 6 August 2012 21:01, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Aug 06 2012, Dirk Behme wrote:
>> On embedded devices, often there is a combination of removable mmc
>> devices (e.g. MMC/SD cards) and hard wired ones (e.g. eMMC).
>> Depending on the hardware configuration, the 'mmcblkN' node might
>> c
On 6 June 2012 12:41, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> for i in 2 3 30 31 ; do
> sudo flashbench --open-au --open-au-nr=30 --erasesize=$[512 * 1024] \
> /dev/mmcblk0 --offset=$[24*1024*1024]
> done
>
> The latest version of the code is at
> git://git.linaro.org/people/arnd/flashbenc
On 11 April 2012 21:17, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote:
>
>> Can someone on the LT, working with Omar, take some time to dig into what all
>> is needed to boot mainline with DT support? I'm a little surprised
>> too that it doesn't
>> just work out of the box. :/
>
> It would be helpful to sort out if I
On 11 April 2012 06:10, Andy Green wrote:
>>
>> Can someone on the LT, working with Omar, take some time to dig into what all
>> is needed to boot mainline with DT support? I'm a little surprised
>> too that it doesn't
>> just work out of the box. :/
>
> Jassi already took a look last week at v3.
On 15 March 2012 15:39, Jannis Pohlmann wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On 03/15/2012 01:39 AM, Tony Mansson wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is interesting. I'd like to reproduce the Ethernet speed tests.
>>
>> Do you have the exact command lines?
>
> Sure. You'll need two machines, on being the board. Both need to be
On 13 January 2012 22:44, Dechesne, Nicolas wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Andy Green wrote:
>>
>> Amit, do you know of a good place to raid for better cpuidle, closer to
>> upstream than OZ?
>
> wasn't that merged in 3.2? are you looking for that :
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux
On 13 January 2012 16:13, Andy Green wrote:
> On 01/13/2012 05:59 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd like to do some tests with cpuidle on my panda board but i'm
>> facing some issues:
>>
>> Originally, i'd like to use the Linaro developer image which uses the
>> la
On 9 December 2011 08:49, Tushar Behera wrote:
> On 12/08/2011 07:02 PM, Jassi Brar wrote:
>>
>> Guys, any reason to keep me, the author of the driver, out of loop ?
>> I almost lost this patch, had it not for chance.
>
>
> Apologies. I didn't realize
On 8 December 2011 13:46, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 16:43 +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>> Vinod Koul wrote:
>> >
>> > On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 16:15 +0530, Tushar Behera wrote:
>> > > amba_probe() now calls pm_runtime_get_noresume() and pm_runtime_enable()
>> > > for the devices before th
On 29 November 2011 07:31, Kurt Taylor wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Last week I did an initial drop of the end to end audio test we have been
> discussing.
>
> The idea is fairly simple, play a sine wave and test the audio stack by
> sampling/testing the sine back in via loopback cable. The app is ca
On 9 September 2011 05:29, Mark Brown
wrote:
> Jassi's suggestion was that we should have some magic to
> automatically generate defaults for the relevant device registrations to
> sidestep these issues.
Perhaps there is some misunderstanding no witchcraft is involved here.
To be clear, I sugg
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 11:04 PM, Mans Rullgard wrote:
> This converts the per-board modules to platform drivers for a
> device created by in main platform setup. These drivers call
> snd_soc_register_card() directly instead of going via a "soc-audio"
> device and the corresponding driver in soc-c
On 9 September 2011 00:35, Mans Rullgard wrote:
> On 8 September 2011 19:17, Jassi Brar wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 11:04 PM, Mans Rullgard
>> wrote:
>>> This converts the per-board modules to platform drivers for a
>>> device created by in main pl
On 8 September 2011 23:48, Mark Brown
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 11:47:16PM +0530, Jassi Brar wrote:
>
>> Can't we do by having omap_init_audio() in arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c
>> generate a platform device of name depending upon machine_is_* ?
>
> That's
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Marcin Juszkiewicz
wrote:
> On czw, 2011-05-26 at 15:08 +0530, Jassi Brar wrote:
>
>> BTW, SDHC cards are SD cards with >2GB capacity.
>
> There are 4GB SD cards on market - very popular in WinCE based car
> navigation systems with lac
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 2:50 PM, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote:
>> Is your card really 1GB SD Card? Were any of the other cards SDHC?
>>
>
> yeah...it's Kingston 1GB card. I have only two cards with me now. I can try
> with some
> other cards also.
Most probably it's card issue. I have been using
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Sachin Kamat wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat
>
> Change-Id: I39652f14b362c42ebc2ceb37952d8e57cf89692c
> ---
> opensles/libopensles/Android.mk | 2 +-
> opensles/libopensles/IAndroidEffect.c | 130
> ---
> opensles
17 matches
Mail list logo
