On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 12:05:30AM +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
Another point to mention, is the proposal to merge the board
enablement topics first, and the generic features next (the LSK
case). This would assume the generic topics to enable their features
for all the linaro supported
On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 10:10 +0530, Tushar Behera wrote:
Timely updates on llct for each mainline -rc are very interesting
though, in fact we depend on them.
+1.
Another +1 :-)
Well, it's timely updates to linux-linaro I'm most interested in, but
that implies regular llct updates as
On 06/04/2013 03:22 AM, Andy Green wrote:
On 22/05/13 02:48, the mail apparently from Andrey Konovalov included:
The next steps are:
May 22: ll rebuild based on llct-20130521.0
May 23: ll rebuild based on llct-20130521.0, linux-linaro release
candidate, code freeze
The last llct update for
On 05/06/13 04:05, the mail apparently from Andrey Konovalov included:
On 06/04/2013 03:22 AM, Andy Green wrote:
On 22/05/13 02:48, the mail apparently from Andrey Konovalov included:
The next steps are:
May 22: ll rebuild based on llct-20130521.0
May 23: ll rebuild based on llct-20130521.0,
On 22/05/13 02:48, the mail apparently from Andrey Konovalov included:
The next steps are:
May 22: ll rebuild based on llct-20130521.0
May 23: ll rebuild based on llct-20130521.0, linux-linaro release
candidate, code freeze
The last llct update for this cycle is scheduled on May 21,
The last
Timely updates on llct for each mainline -rc are very interesting
though, in fact we depend on them.
+1.
--
Tushar Behera
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
