On Tue, April 17, 2012 12:17 am, Shawn Guo wrote:
On 17 April 2012 11:50, Turquette, Mike mturque...@ti.com wrote:
That is a good question. I think it is worth waiting on Saravana's
patch which exposes non-private members of struct clk via struct
clk_hw. This will have an effect on both
On 04/17/2012 12:17 AM, Shawn Guo wrote:
On 17 April 2012 11:50, Turquette, Mikemturque...@ti.com wrote:
That is a good question. I think it is worth waiting on Saravana's
patch which exposes non-private members of struct clk via struct
clk_hw. This will have an effect on both platform clock
On 17 April 2012 11:50, Turquette, Mike mturque...@ti.com wrote:
That is a good question. I think it is worth waiting on Saravana's
patch which exposes non-private members of struct clk via struct
clk_hw. This will have an effect on both platform clock data and
code.
Saravana,
(*nudge*)
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 06:02:51PM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote:
This patch is the basic clk version of 'clk: core: copy parent_names
return error codes'.
The registration functions are changed to allow the core code to copy
the array of strings and allow platforms to declare those arrays as
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Shawn Guo shawn@linaro.org wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 06:02:51PM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote:
...
@@ -175,23 +188,32 @@ struct clk *clk_register_divider(struct device *dev,
const char *name,
div-flags = clk_divider_flags;
div-lock =
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Sascha Hauer s.ha...@pengutronix.de wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 06:02:51PM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote:
This patch is the basic clk version of 'clk: core: copy parent_names
return error codes'.
The registration functions are changed to allow the core code
On 17 April 2012 07:10, Turquette, Mike mturque...@ti.com wrote:
...
Yes, this was a braindead change on my part. I'll remove the kstrdup
in my next series (the rest of this patch will stay in).
Do you have an ETA on that? A few platform porting are waiting for a
stable branch with all
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Shawn Guo shawn@linaro.org wrote:
On 17 April 2012 07:10, Turquette, Mike mturque...@ti.com wrote:
...
Yes, this was a braindead change on my part. I'll remove the kstrdup
in my next series (the rest of this patch will stay in).
Do you have an ETA on
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 06:02:51PM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote:
...
@@ -175,23 +188,32 @@ struct clk *clk_register_divider(struct device *dev,
const char *name,
div-flags = clk_divider_flags;
div-lock = lock;
+ /* allocate the temporary parent_names */
if
This patch is the basic clk version of 'clk: core: copy parent_names
return error codes'.
The registration functions are changed to allow the core code to copy
the array of strings and allow platforms to declare those arrays as
__initdata.
This patch also converts all of the basic clk
10 matches
Mail list logo
