Hi Sascha,
I had sent out v3 patch before the your last comments.
I noticed how davinci is doing, but some SOCs like omap, they also do it in
another way like my code.
However, if you prefer the way davinci is doing, I will redo it. Please
confirm.
thanks
Yong
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:54 AM,
+ return 0;
+}
+
+late_initcall(imx_cpuidle_init);
We have a late_initcall here which needs to be protected from other
cpus. On the other hand we depend on board code calling
imx_cpuidle_board_params() before this initcall. I think the board code
should call a
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 09:18:11AM +0100, Yong Shen wrote:
+ return 0;
+}
+
+late_initcall(imx_cpuidle_init);
We have a late_initcall here which needs to be protected from other
cpus. On the other hand we depend on board code calling
imx_cpuidle_board_params() before
Hi Sascha,
+ local_irq_disable();
+ do_gettimeofday(before);
+
+ plat_lpc = __raw_readl(MXC_CORTEXA8_PLAT_LPC)
+ ~(MXC_CORTEXA8_PLAT_LPC_DSM);
One thing that strikes me here is the fact that this code can probably
run on i.MX53 aswell, right? It's only that
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:36:12AM +0100, yong.s...@linaro.org wrote:
From: Yong Shen yong.s...@freescale.com
implement cpuidle driver for iMX5 SOCs, leave cpuidle params to board
related code.
Signed-off-by: Yong Shen yong.s...@freescale.com
---
arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile |1 +
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:36:12AM +0100, yong.s...@linaro.org wrote:
From: Yong Shen yong.s...@freescale.com
implement cpuidle driver for iMX5 SOCs, leave cpuidle params to board
related code.
Signed-off-by: Yong Shen yong.s...@freescale.com
---
arch/arm/mach-mx5/Makefile |1 +
