On 12 January 2011 00:01, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 11:28:51AM +0200, Ira Rosen wrote:
>> I am still not able to make the board work. With a new SD card, we are
>> getting the same problem.
>> ./linaro-media-create --mmc /dev/mmcblk0
>
> Is this the correct target device name
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 11:28:51AM +0200, Ira Rosen wrote:
> I am still not able to make the board work. With a new SD card, we are
> getting the same problem.
> ./linaro-media-create --mmc /dev/mmcblk0
Is this the correct target device name? SD card readers on laptops and
desktops normally show
Hi,
I am still not able to make the board work. With a new SD card, we are
getting the same problem.
We do:
./linaro-media-create --mmc /dev/mmcblk0 rootfs ext3 --dev beagle
--binary image/linaro-m-headless-tar-*.tar.gz --hwpack
/root/hwpack_linaro-omap3_20110106-0_armel_supported.tar.gz
The im
On 22 November 2010 21:07, Michael Hudson wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 15:09:29 +0200, Ira Rosen wrote:
>> On 22 November 2010 15:02, Anand Gadiyar wrote:
>> >
>> > If it's the XM (as your bootloader claims), then there is no on-board NAND.
>> > Your SD card is the only storage, and you should b
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 15:09:29 +0200, Ira Rosen wrote:
> On 22 November 2010 15:02, Anand Gadiyar wrote:
> >
> > If it's the XM (as your bootloader claims), then there is no on-board NAND.
> > Your SD card is the only storage, and you should be able to recover by
> > reformatting and updating the i
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 11:43:30AM -0200, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
> I thought this old hwpack could be to blame, but I can't reproduce the
> error you saw with an image created using that hwpack. Anyway, there
> are newer hwpacks in
> http://snapshots.linaro.org/10.11-daily/linaro-hwpacks/ which
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010, Anand Gadiyar wrote:
> It would be u-boot. x-loader is up and configured, and looking for u-boot.
> x-load doesn't care which image it is though - you could load any
> other image and x-load will just jump to it and start executing.
oh right, sorry I thought Dave was asking
Hi Ira, just out of curiosity, have you tried this with the 10.11 release
images? I know some people tested that with Beagle XM and it was reported
to work, so it may be worth seeing if it's something with your board, or
something in u-boot that has broken since then.
Thanks,
Paul Larson
On 22 November 2010 19:22, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Ira Rosen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > After working fine for a while, the board crashed during the weekend,
> > and I am getting the following error:
> >
> > Texas Instruments X-Loader 1.4.4ss (Sep 30 2010 - 14:44:32)
>
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010, Dave Martin wrote:
> > u-boot.bin not found or blank nand contents - attempting serial boot . . .
> > ## Ready for binary (kermit) download to 0x80008000 at 115200 bps..
>
> Does anyone know what image is expected over serial in this situation?
> Is it MLO or u-boot.bin?
I
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Ira Rosen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After working fine for a while, the board crashed during the weekend,
> and I am getting the following error:
>
> Texas Instruments X-Loader 1.4.4ss (Sep 30 2010 - 14:44:32)
> Beagle xM Rev A
> Reading boot sector
>
> not there
> u-boot
On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 12:21 +0200, Ira Rosen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After working fine for a while, the board crashed during the weekend,
> and I am getting the following error:
>
> Texas Instruments X-Loader 1.4.4ss (Sep 30 2010 - 14:44:32)
> Beagle xM Rev A
> Reading boot sector
>
> not there
> u-b
On 22 November 2010 15:17, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 22 November 2010 13:09, Ira Rosen wrote:
>> On 22 November 2010 15:02, Anand Gadiyar wrote:
>>> If it's the XM (as your bootloader claims), then there is no on-board NAND.
>>> Your SD card is the only storage, and you should be able to recover
On 22 November 2010 13:09, Ira Rosen wrote:
> On 22 November 2010 15:02, Anand Gadiyar wrote:
>> If it's the XM (as your bootloader claims), then there is no on-board NAND.
>> Your SD card is the only storage, and you should be able to recover by
>> reformatting and updating the images on the SD
On 22 November 2010 15:02, Anand Gadiyar wrote:
>
>
> On 22 November 2010 17:12, Ira Rosen wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 22 November 2010 12:04, Pawel Moll wrote:
>> >> Texas Instruments X-Loader 1.4.4ss (Sep 30 2010 - 14:44:32)
>> >> Beagle xM Rev A
>> >> Reading boot sector
>> >> not there
>> >>
On 22 November 2010 17:12, Ira Rosen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 22 November 2010 12:04, Pawel Moll wrote:
> >> Texas Instruments X-Loader 1.4.4ss (Sep 30 2010 - 14:44:32)
> >> Beagle xM Rev A
> >> Reading boot sector
> >> not there
> >> u-boot.bin not found or blank nand contents - attempting serial b
Hi,
On 22 November 2010 12:04, Pawel Moll wrote:
>> Texas Instruments X-Loader 1.4.4ss (Sep 30 2010 - 14:44:32)
>> Beagle xM Rev A
>> Reading boot sector
>> not there
>> u-boot.bin not found or blank nand contents - attempting serial boot . . .
>> Any clue?
>
> Just a thought - looks like your N
> Texas Instruments X-Loader 1.4.4ss (Sep 30 2010 - 14:44:32)
> Beagle xM Rev A
> Reading boot sector
> not there
> u-boot.bin not found or blank nand contents - attempting serial boot . . .
> Any clue?
Just a thought - looks like your NAND got corrupted... Can you try to
boot your board holding
Hi,
After working fine for a while, the board crashed during the weekend,
and I am getting the following error:
Texas Instruments X-Loader 1.4.4ss (Sep 30 2010 - 14:44:32)
Beagle xM Rev A
Reading boot sector
not there
u-boot.bin not found or blank nand contents - attempting serial boot . . .
##
19 matches
Mail list logo
