intersted and the time is fine for me.
thanks,
Mounir
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Michael Hope wrote:
> (cc'ed to linaro-toolchain, bcc'ed to others who may be interested)
>
> I'm considering adding a new Linaro Toolchain meeting to cover people
> in the North/South American timezones. We've
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010, John Rigby wrote:
> I'm really sorry to have started this, but for completeness here is
> the rest of the story.
No need to be sorry, I think you're doing right to bring this up
> The hypothetical scenario is a developer that
> maintains u-boot for m
I'm really sorry to have started this, but for completeness here is
the rest of the story. The hypothetical scenario is a developer that
maintains u-boot for multiple platforms. Using a codesourcery or eldk
(from denx.de) toolchain one can use the appropriate -march= to get
the right code from th
Michael Hope wrote on 10/05/2010 09:44:54 PM:
> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 5:39 AM, Ulrich Weigand
wrote:
> > Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> >> The one exception is this one:
> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-04/msg01214.html
> >> (and even that is primarily a GDB issue).
> >
> > This was merge
On Wednesday 06 October 2010, Steve Langasek wrote:
> It sounds like what you need for this is a multilib-enabled armel compiler
> build, that includes a libgcc build for ARMv7 as well as separate libgcc
> builds for whichever other ARM targets you're after. You should coordinate
> this with Marci
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010, Steve Langasek wrote:
> OOI, what are the U-Boot targets you're looking to build for that don't
> support ARMv7? A gcc multilib package for armel will be easy to implement
> but hard to maintain, and certainly none of the systems Linaro is targeting
> should require a pre-Thu
On 10/06/2010 05:00 PM, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> On 05/10/10 15:01, Yao Qi wrote:
>> First of all, the goal of this work is about investigation on speed
>> improvement on linaro gcc 4.5. Finally, the output/result of this work
>> is to list all possible recommendations/actions to improve speed on
>>
On 05/10/10 15:01, Yao Qi wrote:
First of all, the goal of this work is about investigation on speed
improvement on linaro gcc 4.5. Finally, the output/result of this work
is to list all possible recommendations/actions to improve speed on
linaro 4.5. Comments to this plan are welcome.
I beli
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Yao Qi wrote:
> On 10/06/2010 05:38 AM, Michael Hope wrote:
> | Open sessions:
> | We have a few at lin...@uds
>
> Where can I find them? http://summit.ubuntu.com/uds-n/ doesn't give me
> much information on lin...@uds. I assume that sessions or topics are
> liste
Dnia środa, 6 października 2010 o 00:10:58 Michael Hope napisał(a):
> (cc'ed to linaro-toolchain, bcc'ed to others who may be interested)
>
> I'm considering adding a new Linaro Toolchain meeting to cover people
> in the North/South American timezones. We've got quite a few people
> in that area
10 matches
Mail list logo
