[ACTIVITY] Week 40 : Oct 14 - Oct 18

2013-10-18 Thread Ryan Arnold
I accidentally sent without completing my 'Progress' section. == Progress == eglibc -> glibc transition: * Investigated upstream plan to retire eglibc and the implication of losing options groups. Cbuildv2 - Random patches * [PATCH][Cbuildv2/get_source 17/17] lib/common.sh: get_source - Fix

[ACTIVITY] Week 40 : Oct 14 - Oct 18

2013-10-18 Thread Ryan Arnold
== Progress == eglibc -> glibc transition: * Investigated upstream plan to retire eglibc and the implication of losing options groups. Cbuildv2 * [PATCH][test_fetch_md5sums_fix] testsuite/test.sh: Always override ${local_snapshots} for tests. [PATCH][test_fetch_md5sums_fix] testsuite/test.s

Re: [question]multi-arch support for arm and arm64

2013-10-18 Thread Christopher Covington
Hi Wookey, On 10/18/2013 11:49 AM, Wookey wrote: > +++ Christopher Covington [2013-10-18 10:25 -0400]: > > I still haven't determined to my satisfaction whether the linaro binary > (cross) toolchains > can be used for multiarch cross-building by just moving files > about/symlinking and fiddlin

[ACTIVITY] Week 42

2013-10-18 Thread Will Newton
== Progress == * Relased gdb 7.6.1 2013.10 * Respin of qemu VSEL patches * Bug fixing and performance measurement on malloc == Issues == * None == Plan == * Refactor malloc to improve performance * Prepare for Connect -- Will Newton Toolchain Working Group, Linaro __

[ACTIVITY] report week 42

2013-10-18 Thread Peter Maydell
Progress: * back from sabbatical! * caught up on admin, email, etc * code review: Christoffer's GIC related patches; VSEL support in 32 bit v8; support for VBAR; integrator bugfixes; others * working on a pullreq for ARM stuff to go into QEMU 1.7 (we're now in softfreeze) Plans: * att

Re: [question]multi-arch support for arm and arm64

2013-10-18 Thread Wookey
+++ Christopher Covington [2013-10-18 10:25 -0400]: > On 10/17/2013 07:21 AM, Zhou Zhu wrote: > It would be nice if it were easier to install the binary toolchain releases > into a multi-arch rootfs, It would. Currently you can use distro cross-toolchains (from Ubuntu, and Debian soon if I get

Re: [question]multi-arch support for arm and arm64

2013-10-18 Thread Christopher Covington
On 10/17/2013 07:21 AM, Zhou Zhu wrote: > So how does the libraries place in the rootfs? like lib/lib64 as in x86/x64? > Is there any similar rule in arm/arm64 system (whatever > openebedded/ubuntu/android/...) for that? Like multi arch spec in ubuntu? OpenEmbedded unfortunately does not support m

Re: [question]multi-arch support for arm and arm64

2013-10-18 Thread Matthias Klose
Am 17.10.2013 13:21, schrieb Zhou Zhu: > On 10/17/2013 06:31 PM, Matthew Gretton-Dann wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 16 October 2013 11:45, Zhou Zhu wrote: >>> Hi, >>> We are working on userspace aarch64 and aarch32 apps and we are trying to >>> run 32/64 mode app simultaneously. >>> Is there any multi-ar

Re: [question]multi-arch support for arm and arm64

2013-10-18 Thread Zhou Zhu
On 10/17/2013 06:31 PM, Matthew Gretton-Dann wrote: Hi, On 16 October 2013 11:45, Zhou Zhu wrote: Hi, We are working on userspace aarch64 and aarch32 apps and we are trying to run 32/64 mode app simultaneously. Is there any multi-arch support for mixed rootfs (has linkers/libs of both arm and

[ACTIVITY] Week 42

2013-10-18 Thread Zhenqiang Chen
== Issues == * None == Progress == * Prepare Linaro toolchain binaries 2013.10 release - Update EGLIBC version to 2013.10 and enable-profile for AARCH64. - Generate Linaro prebuilt sysroot for arm-linux-gnueabihf. * Commit patch to Reassociate X == CST1 || X == CST2 if popcount (CST2 - CST1)