On Mon, 4 Jan 2016, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
> Nicolas, I am about to start a new thread about ""ld -r" on mixed
> IR/non-IR objects", asking current status from H.J. Lu, what is
> preventing upstream merge, concerns and objections.
>
> First I would to know which the priority of this feature f
, January 4, 2016 5:33 AM
To: Pinski, Andrew ; Nicolas Pitre
Cc: Jim Wilson ; Linaro Toolchain Mailman List
Subject: Re: mixed LTO support for 'ld -r'
These are orthogonal requests, let's track them independently. Also, although
I noticed s390 work to add split-stack support, m
On 23-12-2015 15:41, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Dec 2015, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>> Em 22 de dez de 2015, às 14:22, Nicolas Pitre
>>> escreveu:
>>>
On Mon, 21 Dec 2015, Jim Wilson wrote:
I tracked the bulk of the patch back to April 2011, though some new
-
> From: linaro-toolchain [mailto:linaro-toolchain-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On
> Behalf Of Nicolas Pitre
> Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 9:41 AM
> To: Adhemerval Zanella
> Cc: Jim Wilson ; Linaro Toolchain Mailman List
>
> Subject: Re: mixed LTO support for 'ld -r
To: Adhemerval Zanella
Cc: Jim Wilson ; Linaro Toolchain Mailman List
Subject: Re: mixed LTO support for 'ld -r'
On Wed, 23 Dec 2015, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
>
>
> > Em 22 de dez de 2015, às 14:22, Nicolas Pitre
> > escreveu:
> >
> >> On Mon,
On Wed, 23 Dec 2015, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
>
>
> > Em 22 de dez de 2015, às 14:22, Nicolas Pitre
> > escreveu:
> >
> >> On Mon, 21 Dec 2015, Jim Wilson wrote:
> >>
> >> I tracked the bulk of the patch back to April 2011, though some new
> >> LTO related testsuite changes date back to Jan
> Em 22 de dez de 2015, às 14:22, Nicolas Pitre
> escreveu:
>
>> On Mon, 21 Dec 2015, Jim Wilson wrote:
>>
>> I tracked the bulk of the patch back to April 2011, though some new
>> LTO related testsuite changes date back to January 2011. The initial
>> patch submission for the bulk of the pa
On Mon, 21 Dec 2015, Jim Wilson wrote:
> I tracked the bulk of the patch back to April 2011, though some new
> LTO related testsuite changes date back to January 2011. The initial
> patch submission for the bulk of the patch appears to be
> https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2011-04/msg00275.
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 4:55 AM, Adhemerval Zanella
wrote:
>> This mix of LTO and non-LTO object files is not supported by upstream
>> binutils unless a patch from H.J. Lu is applied. That patch has been
>> available since 2013 and was last refreshed in his 2.25.51.0.4 branch
>> last September. I
Hi Nicolas,
On 18-12-2015 19:04, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> Hello toolchain gurus,
>
> In the course of Linaro's kernel tinification project, the ability to
> compile the Linux kernel using LTO is a frequent requirement. However
> the kernel makes heavy usage of 'ld -r' with .o files resulting from
Hello toolchain gurus,
In the course of Linaro's kernel tinification project, the ability to
compile the Linux kernel using LTO is a frequent requirement. However
the kernel makes heavy usage of 'ld -r' with .o files resulting from LTO
build of .c files as well as .o files resulting from pure a
11 matches
Mail list logo