RE: lingo-l lingo.ini -- necessary?

2003-07-10 Thread Mendelsohn, Michael
Hi all... Thanks for replying about my lingo.ini question. I really appreciate the feedback. - Michael M. [To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email

lingo-l lingo.ini -- necessary?

2003-07-09 Thread Mendelsohn, Michael
Hi all... In Bruce Epstein's book Lingo In A Nutshell, page 566, it talks about including the lingo.ini file alongside the projector. This, I assume, is in addition to the projectorName.ini file I always include. I've never included a lingo.ini file when distributing my stuff on a CD (Windows),

Re: lingo-l lingo.ini -- necessary?

2003-07-09 Thread Colin Holgate
I've never included a lingo.ini file when distributing my stuff on a CD (Windows), but things have always worked. Is it really necessary to do this? You don't need the projector.ini either, unless you're trying to initialize something before the preparemovie of the first movie. I believe that

Re: lingo-l lingo.ini -- necessary?

2003-07-09 Thread Slava Paperno
Not necessary, but handy. You can define global variables there, and your projector will read them. You can establish settings there as well, such as set the soundkeepdevice to 0. In other words, if there's a setting or variable you want to be able to change without modifying your movie or

Re: lingo-l lingo.ini -- necessary?

2003-07-09 Thread Buzz Kettles
At 11:43 AM -0400 7/9/03, you wrote: Hi all... In Bruce Epstein's book Lingo In A Nutshell, page 566, it talks about including the lingo.ini file alongside the projector. This, I assume, is in addition to the projectorName.ini file I always include. I've never included a lingo.ini file when

Re: lingo-l lingo.ini -- necessary?

2003-07-09 Thread Mark A. Boyd
At 08:43 2003-07-09, Mendelsohn, Michael wrote: In Bruce Epstein's book Lingo In A Nutshell, page 566, it talks about including the lingo.ini file alongside the projector. Just to throw another $0.02 in the pot, there was a quirk with some computers several versions ago that the Lingo.ini was

Re: lingo-l lingo.ini -- necessary?

2003-07-09 Thread Buzz Kettles
One last note about the Lingo,ini file As of d7, it's capabilities changed (they were reduced) for instance, The Lingo.ini can no longer put info directly to the Message window (as the default Lingo.ini included before d7 had demonstrated). This particular task currently fails because the