At 06:05 PM 10/09/2013, Richard wrote:
My take, with a correction:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/09/10/turnbull_floats_evote_compulsory_id/
I was given the context lecture by a Turnbull staffer, which is typical
spinner behaviour. God knows what rope political staffers have
On Tue, 10 Sep 2013, Jan Whitaker wrote:
[We didn't hear a thing about it this time, even for disabled access.
What happened to the 'next big thing'? I'd be interested in Linkers'
view of the security of evoting now - have things changed or is
Diebold still sus?]
My view is that the code
Optus weighs in with plan for broadband
BY: MITCHELL BINGEMANN From: The Australian September 12, 2013
OPTUS is considering plans to front the construction costs of laying fibre
across the last mile of the Coalition's fibre-to-the-node plan, allowing
consumers to get it direct to their homes
I just got my statement from the Commonwealth Bank. Enclosed with it was
a brochure about PIN numbers - they want everyone to use a PIN, because
they are more secure than signatures, doncha know.
In the brochure was this gem:
It's important to create a PIN that you can easily
remember,
On 11/09/13 10:46, Bernard Robertson-Dunn wrote:
On 11/09/2013 8:23 AM, Tom Worthington wrote:
It's Cass-Dunbar, not Cass-Dunba.
Apologies, I have corrected the blog version:
http://blog.tomw.net.au/2013/09/effect-of-new-government-on-ict-in.html
IMHO, there is a risk that any government
Does the fibre ownership remain with Optus?
The two big economic advantages of the old NBN is firstly that it provided
an open market for content and secondly that it was priced at cost rather
than priced on its utility to users. The object of any smart business is
to charge for their products
