Re: [LINK] The Australian tells me cookies are NOT enabled, but cookies ARE enabled

2014-06-02 Thread Kim Holburn
Not that I care but this doesn't work for me. It may be something to do with my firefox setup. On 2014/Jun/02, at 4:47 PM, Bernard Robertson-Dunn wrote: > On 2/06/2014 4:23 PM, Kim Holburn wrote: >> How do you read anything on that site? I just get the message: >> >>> Premium Content > > Goo

[LINK] web: Global police operation disrupts aggressive Cryptolocker virus | Technology ...

2014-06-02 Thread Jan Whitaker
Any Linker advice on this one? I ask because the website with the supposed advice is cactus at the moment (hours). http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jun/02/cryptolocker-virus-nca-malware-protection Jan Melbourne, Victoria, Australia jw...@janwhitaker.com Sooner or later, I hat

[LINK] Response from Australian re cookies

2014-06-02 Thread Karl Auer
This is what the Australian said in response to my question about whether they need third-party cookies to be settable: "You may need to unblock your cookies, as some of the required cookies for our website may not be named as obviously as the major cookies and, as such, will not allow

Re: [LINK] Response from Australian re cookies

2014-06-02 Thread Christopher Vance
Sounds like they want you to accept third party cookies, but won't say it explicitly. On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Karl Auer wrote: > This is what the Australian said in response to my question about > whether they need third-party cookies to be settable: > >"You may need to unblock you

Re: [LINK] Response from Australian re cookies

2014-06-02 Thread JanW
At 11:23 AM 3/06/2014, Christopher Vance you wrote: >Sounds like they want you to accept third party cookies, but won't say it >explicitly. I don't allow 3rd party and it worked for me. Karl, you could clear the cookie cache (history/clear cache/ untick all the ones you want to keep, leave c

Re: [LINK] A question of privacy

2014-06-02 Thread David Boxall
On 6/12/2013 10:24 AM, Roger Clarke wrote: > At 9:52 +1100 6/12/13, David Boxall wrote: >> Has privacy legislation been violated ... ? > > Such questions should be directed to the Office of the Australian > Information Commissioner (OAIC). ... > > Good luck, and keep us posted (:-)} > Unfortunately