[linrad] Re: complete answer from Roger

2006-11-09 Thread Joe Taylor
Hi Josh and all, KD7HGL (Josh Logan) wrote: Since I have a ts-2000 I would be interested in seeing the source code. Are you using the ts-2000 for RX or only TX? If you are using it for RX how have you setup the radio. 73, JOSH KD7HGL I will append below my file users_extra.c, which can

[linrad] Re: complete answer from Roger

2006-11-09 Thread KD7HGL (Josh Logan)
Since I have a ts-2000 I would be interested in seeing the source code. Are you using the ts-2000 for RX or only TX? If you are using it for RX how have you setup the radio. 73, JOSH KD7HGL Joe Taylor wrote: Hi Leif, Thanks for your quick answers, which will be very helpful to my curren

[linrad] Re: complete answer from Roger

2006-11-08 Thread Joe Taylor
Hi Leif, Thanks for your quick answers, which will be very helpful to my current effort to build a JT65 decoder to work directly with Linrad. A brief response to your last point ... ... I would like to be able to make both waterfalls pause (or at least go black) when one is transmitting, to

[linrad] Re: complete answer from Roger

2006-11-08 Thread J.D. Bakker
> - it is just like opening a "regular" socket with agroup target address. See > http://www.cs.unc.edu/~jeffay/dirt/FAQ/comp249-001-F99/mcast-socket.html or the bible of Stevens My problem is that this is far to cryptic. I could spend a lot of time searching the net, but maybe someon

[linrad] Re: complete answer from Roger

2006-11-08 Thread J.D. Bakker
> - it is just like opening a "regular" socket with agroup target address. See > http://www.cs.unc.edu/~jeffay/dirt/FAQ/comp249-001-F99/mcast-socket.html or the bible of Stevens My problem is that this is far to cryptic. I could spend a lot of time searching the net, but maybe someon

[linrad] Re: complete answer from Roger

2006-11-08 Thread Leif Asbrink
Hi xtof and all, > May I suggest using multicast IP for this purpose so that > the datagrams just get placed on the network and can be subscribed > to by any station that wants to participate in the multicast > group. This will scale very well, potentially beyond the > local network if the infrast

[linrad] Re: complete answer from Roger

2006-11-08 Thread Christophe Huygens
Leif Asbrink wrote: Hello Joe ans all, 1. The Network capability does not seem to exist in recent Linrad versions. Is this correct, or am I missing something about starting it up? Yes. I have not put the network back after the multi-thread change. The network was not particularly clever, rat

[linrad] Re: complete answer from Roger

2006-11-08 Thread Leif Asbrink
Hello Joe ans all, > 1. The Network capability does not seem to exist in recent Linrad > versions. Is this correct, or am I missing something about starting it up? Yes. I have not put the network back after the multi-thread change. The network was not particularly clever, rather than putting it

[linrad] Re: complete answer from Roger

2006-11-08 Thread Joe Taylor
Hi Leif and all, Thanks for your answers to my questions posed on October 31. Your reward is a new set of questions about Linrad features ... :-) 1. The Network capability does not seem to exist in recent Linrad versions. Is this correct, or am I missing something about starting it up? 2.

[linrad] Re: complete answer from Roger

2006-11-03 Thread Leif Asbrink
Hi Joe and all, > > With these parameters Linrad is very sensitive in the main waterfall > > provided that the waterfall is made very slow. No more than > > 10 lines per second. The reason is that S/N may be lost in the process > > of converting the 16384 spectrum to a waterfall of about 100 pixel

[linrad] Re: complete answer from Roger

2006-10-31 Thread Joe Taylor
Leif and all -- It has been some time since your email of October 18, but I have finally found time to think about some of the suggestions you made for optimizing Linrad parameters for use with WSJT/JT65. You suggest using fft1 BW=80 Hz, sin^3 window, first mixer BW reduction parameter=3, a

[linrad] Re: complete answer from Roger

2006-10-19 Thread Joe Taylor
Leif and all -- Many thanks for your input and suggestions. Linrad was not written for wsjt, the AFC needs a time delay of something like 15 seconds to make a non-decodable jt65 signal stable enough to decode when the signal is close to the jt65 detect threshold (preliminary result) While this

[linrad] Re: complete answer from Roger

2006-10-18 Thread Leif Asbrink
Hi Joe and all, > I think Roger solved the "problem" with his email to the Linrad > reflector, copied at the very bottom of this message. > > He has found no significant difference in JT65 *decoding ability* with > Linrad and with a conventional receiver. What he does see is different > *S/N

[linrad] Re: complete answer from Roger

2006-10-18 Thread Joe Taylor
Jeffrey, and all -- I think Roger solved the "problem" with his email to the Linrad reflector, copied at the very bottom of this message. He has found no significant difference in JT65 *decoding ability* with Linrad and with a conventional receiver. What he does see is different *S/N levels