On 16-05-31 06:32 PM, Charles MacDonald wrote:
> On 16-05-31 08:47 AM, Stephen M. Webb wrote:
> Then there's the deb vs. rpm dichotomy, and we will not
>
> Is packaging really even a worry when developing?
>
> the programmer will just be doing "make install" until they are happy with
> the code
> On 16-05-31 04:31 PM, Alex Pilon wrote:
> > Both rpm, dpkg, and apt are showing their age.
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 04:41:57PM -0400, ProfJCNash wrote:
> When binary is just not enough.
Binary what? In practice, you can, and will after a non-large amount of
time, if using many environments, hit
That depends greatly on their environment.
On May 31, 2016 6:32:01 PM EDT, Charles MacDonald wrote:
>On 16-05-31 08:47 AM, Stephen M. Webb wrote:
> Then there's the deb vs. rpm dichotomy, and we will not
>
>Is packaging really even a worry when developing?
>
>the programmer will just be doing "
On 16-05-31 08:47 AM, Stephen M. Webb wrote:
Then there's the deb vs. rpm dichotomy, and we will not
Is packaging really even a worry when developing?
the programmer will just be doing "make install" until they are happy
with the code, and then they can just use a tool to build the RPM and
th
On 16/05/31, ProfJCNash wrote:
> When binary is just not enough.
/me ^5s jcnash! :D
> On 16-05-31 04:31 PM, Alex Pilon wrote:
> > Both rpm, dpkg, and apt are showing their age.
slainte mhath, RGB
--
Richard Guy Briggs -- ~\-- ~\
-- \__
> training clients asked whether there are
> any docs to lead them through how to set up a proper linux
> development environment if their org has never done that
Maybe the Yocto docs, or OpenEmbedded, or the device tree docs if you are
looking at kernel dev.
But the first challenge is to loc
To be fair, replacing binary and library management with packaged
solutions is a lot friendlier for the average user, and encourages safer
computer practices (e.g. get new software from your package manager
instead of some random website).
Sincerely,
Adam Saunders, B.A., M.A. Phil., J.D.
Barri
When binary is just not enough.
On 16-05-31 04:31 PM, Alex Pilon wrote:
> Both rpm, dpkg, and apt are showing their age.
___
Linux mailing list
Linux@lists.oclug.on.ca
http://oclug.on.ca/mailman/listinfo/linux
> Then there's the deb vs. rpm dichotomy,
- CPIO is a superior package format, PERIOD.
- The package manager is what matters THOUGH.
- Both rpm, dpkg, and apt are showing their age. No comment on whether
the replacements in those distros are even decent.
> and we will not mention vi vs. emacs b
On 16-05-31 07:28 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> recently, a couple of my training clients asked whether there are
> any docs to lead them through how to set up a proper linux development
> environment if their org has never done that before, and i had to
> admit, i was unaware of any. in parti
This interests me i.e., a sensible start for Linux development
environment. However, I'm at a conference in Toronto starting tomorrow
and not going to be at OCLUG this month.
JN
On 16-05-31 07:28 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> recently, a couple of my training clients asked whether there are
recently, a couple of my training clients asked whether there are
any docs to lead them through how to set up a proper linux development
environment if their org has never done that before, and i had to
admit, i was unaware of any. in particular, if one wanted to put
together a work environment
12 matches
Mail list logo
