Nope... not "ARM development" as the spammy trigger. Here's the keywords that
pushed it over the edge:
Word: 120+MB (0.990)Word: benchmarked (0.990)Word: multiple+target
(0.990)Word: thread+much (0.990)Word: Cortex+A9 (0.898)Word: Cortex
(0.858)Word: single+multiple (0.820)Word: needed+push (0.820)
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 09:01:44AM -0700, Rob Echlin wrote:
> Anyone know if there is some way we could check if it was caught by
> the spam filter?
Nothing appears to have been blocked. I see the message "OT: NTSC tuner
card" from bjloc...@lockie.ca, but it went through (and so did many of
th
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 06:31:44PM -0400, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
>
> Composite? So I can use my Commodore 1701 or 1702. :D
Yes :)
Dave
___
Linux mailing list
Linux@lists.oclug.on.ca
http://oclug.on.ca/mailman/listinfo/linux
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 05:19:22PM -0400, James wrote:
> I have an NTSC tuner card that I used to receive over the air.
> I don't need it but would it still be good for someone that has digital
> television to view tv on their computer?
Not unless it also receives ATSC -- that's the digital stand
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:48:52PM -0400, Raj wrote:
> I've seen RT (http://bestpractical.com/rt/) used in a lot of places -
> and for the non-tech user, it has a pretty simple interface - just email
> and it will create a new ticket for you (or update an existing one)
I've used RT before, and it
On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 12:23:32PM -0500, Peter Meyer wrote:
>
> Have a look at http://www.dreamhost.com
Guess you didn't read his requirements... he's looking for a Canadian
VPS provider.
Cheers,
Dave
___
Linux mailing list
Linux@lists.oclug.on.ca
htt
On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 20:58:27 -0500 Lisa L wrote:
> It has been suggested that since we'll be moving to the new server,
> this is a good opportunity to reflect on our spam filtering methods. Brett
> Delmage recently encountered an issue where accidentally breaking the
> anti-spam headers rel
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 02:18:18PM -0500, Brett Delmage wrote:
> Can this BEGIN ANTISPAM - VOTING - LINKS spammage be turned off? (see
> bottom of message below). It does not really need to be cluttering every
> list message to every subscriber.
They're turned off for anything sent to *...@list
John C Nash wrote:
> Some of you may remember my OCLUG talk on tools for carrying encrypted
> files on USB. Still on this topic, I'm wondering the best way (for the
> moment just in Linux) to simply view the contents of an encrypted plain
> text file (my password list!) in a way that doesn't lea
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 09:27:49AM -0400, Spencer Cheng wrote:
> As plan B if my search of symmetric connectivity doesn't work out, are
> there any (good) co-location places in Ottawa that actually has decent
> backbone connectivity? I talked to Teksavy who said they will do it
> for $150/month
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 01:33:41PM -0400, Peter Meyer wrote:
> I might be misunderstanding what you are looking for. Would you not be able
> to take two Bell DSL line and from a Linux host use bonding to drive the two
> Ethernet (ppp) interfaces?
No... with ADSL, he's still constrained by the cra
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 07:34:13AM -0400, Dave O'Neill wrote:
> I've got the go-ahead to get OCLUG set up on Hosted CanIt. Someone in
> charge needs to fill out http://www.roaringpenguin.com/node/hostedform
> to get things rolling.
Seeing that nobody's filled out t
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 05:07:11PM +, Lisa wrote:
> Thank you Dave, for your help with this. There's been some discussion
> by the Board, actually, that both hardware and much of the software on
> Tux need upgrading.
I've got the go-ahead to get OCLUG set up on Hosted CanIt. Someone in
ch
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 05:54:34PM -0400, Lisa L wrote:
> I'll paste below the contents of the files John sent. To me, it
> appears to be a Viagra ad coming from a host in Spain, with a link to
> a website in Russia. What we're trying to determine is whether (1)
> Tux has been compromised by crac
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 05:20:18PM -0400, Prof. John C Nash wrote:
> After some board discussion, we've decided to ask OCLUG mail gurus what
> is possibly going on. Seems TUX may be relaying some spam. Hopefully not
> compromised.
The first thing to do is to have someone take a look at the mail
John C Nash wrote:
> For some benchmarking tests I want to do, I'd like to be able to use
> command line tools to get the following information (not only for Linux
> -- my tests will be on Mac and PC too, but that will come later):
>
> - OS version, by which I mean not just the "uname -a" stuff, b
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 12:25:28PM -0800, R RENAUD wrote:
>
> Another good reason not to send sensitive information via email.
I think you mean "Another reason to encrypt your sensitive mail". If
you and your daughter had been using GPG, the message would have been
encrypted with her key, and th
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 05:52:10PM -0500, Damian Gerow wrote:
> I would suggest, unfortunately, that the OP move away from Sendmail.
> Though I haven't seen any significant security vulnerabilities from it
> lately, its configuration file is archaic and difficult to understand.
> There are many oth
18 matches
Mail list logo
