Samy,
A few ways are open to you.
1. Java CCF EJB programming through IMS Connect (on OS/390) to the IMS
message queue.
2. DB2 connect to DB2 for OS/390, DB2 stored proc runs ODBA to access IMS
database.
3. CICS Transaction Gateway, runs CICS/DBCTL txn on OS/390.
4. MQSeries, OTMA to IMS message
hello everybody,
my 2.4.13-ac8 kernel isn't able to recognize the disk-label's from my
original 2.4.7-system. Any quick ideas?
Regards
Simon
--
simon fischer
linux on zSeries - team
becom informationssysteme gmbh - germany
Hi ,
I plan the following case LPR1 for OS/390 R 2 10 or z/OS
LPR2 for Linux/390
and I had the following questions .?
If I will write applications may be ( JAVA applications or Web
applications ) at LPR2 (Linux/390 )
_ Ho
We have SuSe linux running on S/390 in an LPAR and all was well until the
hardware team purchased new DASD and de-creed that we need to move from our
existing UCBs to new devices.
/proc/dasd/devices currently shows:
10A8(ECKD) at (94:0) is dasda:active at blocksize: 4096, 601020 blocks,
2347
Hi Davis..
For devices other than the root device, You can edit the parmfile and
re-run the silo command. You can't do this for root device as the device
that you are adding is not bootable.
Vinod.
> -Original Message-
> From: Davis, Andrew Phillip (SWD) [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> S
We access our 'test' Linux/390 via TCP/IP on the VSE/ESA system (from
Connectivity Systems), their software provides a 'discover' command that
really helps with this (not only on Linux); output looks like:
103 DISCOVER 152.159.87.11308
Z1 0101 TCP910I
This is not correct. See my other reply to Andrew's message.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Ramalingam, Vinod Kumar (Cognizant)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 8:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Moving Linux DASD
Hi Davis..
For devices othe
Thanks again to all who responded to my query. Jay's pointer at buffersizes
resulted in
our problem being solved. Great to have it sorted so promptly.
My colleague John Rattray's note below might just help somebody else.
Regards, Eric Lawler.
-Original Message-
From: Rattray, John : SP-
Andrew,
How much work this requires depends on several things. If you can add the
new DASD to the LPAR _before_ removing the old DASD, then it's pretty
straightforward. If you can't do that, then take a look at
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvtype?LINUX-VM.21315. Sandy Gelbard recently
needed t
> Is it possible to connect a MP 2003 Model 106 on a LAN Fast Ethernet
> knowing that the 2003-106 is equiped with a 5201OSA-2
> Token Ring?
> If yes what is the incidence on the LAN ?
Not directly. You would need a MAU and a token-ring/Ethernet bridge (old
Cisco 25xxes with 1 TR/1 Ether
Does anyone know of a way to do Standalone dump/restore of Linux/390 Dasd Volumes?
(volumes are 3390 Model 3)
Samy,
NEON Systems Inc (where I work), provide ODBC, JDBC and JCA connectivity
from Linux to any OS/390 datasource including IMS/DB and IMS/TM. Details about the
product, Shadow Direct, can be found at http://www.neonsys.com.
Regards
Kevin O'Brien
> Not directly. You would need a MAU and a token-ring/Ethernet bridge (old
> Cisco 25xxes with 1 TR/1 Ethernet are good choices). It'd be fairly
> expensive. The configuration would look like:
>
> 2003 --> TR --> MAU --> TR interface on Cisco 2513 --> Ethernet int on
> 2513 --> Ethernet
old 8228
...networking your several hundred thousand dollar Mainframe with your
several hundred dollar Linux PC...priceless.
> > Not directly. You would need a MAU and a token-ring/Ethernet bridge (old
> > Cisco 25xxes with 1 TR/1 Ethernet are good choices). It'd be fairly
> > expensive. The configuratio
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 04:21:39PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> old 8228 MAU ($40 on ebay)
> random 486 PC with PCI ($20)
> random ethernet card ($10)
> old IBM olympic or lanstreamer card ($100)
> Linux CD
Look of shock on friends' faces: Priceless.
I didn't know Alan was working for Mastercard!
A
On Monday, 12/10/2001 at 11:02 EST, Nick Gimbrone
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The MTU sizes on both sides of the CTC connection must match. Make
both
> > sides 32768 or something. (VTAM CTC connections have the same issues!
If
> > the buffer sizes don't match you get truncated PIUs...) This
Avinoam,
Where, exactly, did you get these files from?
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Avinoam Hirschberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 4:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Linux on lpar
the machine have 512mb and the LPAR have 412mb
Avinoam Hir
> It would have been better if the TCP/IP CTC protocol included an exchange
> of buffer sizes using a pre-defined small I/O buffer. But it didn't and
> that's the way the ball bounces. (The restriction being that the MTU would
> be forced to be less than the I/O buffer size.)
Exactly. But when a
> IIRC the noise you refer to as "key click" was actually the noise of
> the solenoids banging the punches through the card. They had to be
> strong and fast to keep up with an operator that could punch 10,000
> strokes an hour or better.
We had around 140 keypunch operators at any time working a
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 03:11:41PM -0500, Nick Gimbrone wrote:
> And while I'm on the subject... why is it that the IBM proprietary
> device drivers need to be versioned to the kernel (creating all
> sorts of havic for those who what to upgrade before IBM is ready or
> even do their own kernel hac
On Tuesday, 12/11/2001 at 03:11 EST, Nick Gimbrone
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It would have been better if the TCP/IP CTC protocol included an
exchange
> > of buffer sizes using a pre-defined small I/O buffer. But it didn't
and
> > that's the way the ball bounces. (The restriction being that
Alan Altmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Nah. Instead of VCTC, use z/VM 4.2 and guest LANs with virtual
> HiperSockets.
Did I miss something? The "zSeries HiperSockets" Redpaper
said that HiperSockets are QDIO devices, and that they use
the binary-only "qeth" device driver. If not, Nick's st
On Tuesday, 12/11/2001 at 05:34 EST, "Patterson, Ross"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alan Altmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Nah. Instead of VCTC, use z/VM 4.2 and guest LANs with virtual
> > HiperSockets.
>
> Did I miss something? The "zSeries HiperSockets" Redpaper
> said that HiperSockets
23 matches
Mail list logo
