Hi Tim,
> I am working on a patch that removes the old limit of NGROUPS.
>
> In doing so, I am checking everything that references NGROUPS. One
> such place is in arch/s390x/kernel/linux32.c.
>
> I notice these things:
> * s390x defines __kernel_old_gid_t to __kernel_gid_t (unsigned int)
> * s39
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 06:28:20PM +0200, Willem Konynenberg wrote:
> "Post, Mark K" wrote:
> > From: Scully, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 9:52 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Enlarging Root File System
> >
> >
> > Here's my zipl configuration
At 15:07 27-08-02 +0900, Jae-hwa Park wrote:
>What should I do for this problem?
Just run 'mkswap' - depending on your kernel (and on
whether you made it CMS reserved) either the FBA or
the diag code in the dasd driver will pick it up and
treat it as a disk with just one partition for the
entire
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 10:04:20AM +0200, Rob van der Heij wrote:
> At 15:07 27-08-02 +0900, Jae-hwa Park wrote:
>
> >What should I do for this problem?
>
> Just run 'mkswap' - depending on your kernel (and on
> whether you made it CMS reserved) either the FBA or
> the diag code in the dasd driver
>Dave Jones made some mention about a checkbox on the registration form. I
>don't know if that's going to work for him or not. I do know that when the
>CDs are ready, I get an email from them, and I can request one from the
>SHARE web site. I did that for Minneapolis, and got the CD not too lon
Hi...
You mention 'routed' in your network, but I believe the routed application
uses multicast or broadcast to exchange routing information. If you are
running z/VM 4.2.0 HiperSockets it will not support multicast.
If you are using z/VM 4.3.0 the HiperSockets simulation supports multicast
or y
The corollary to that is that the only dumb question is the one that goes
unasked, because it will probably go unanswered. There is a wealth of
talent and experience connected to this list that far outstrips the talents
contained within any one company, or any one discipline. You guys have
saved m
Greetings list
I Have installed kernel 2.4.17 and IBM patches as well as the s390-tools. Run
zipl and rebooted When I run zipl again I get IPL form CMS reserved minidisks
not supported cannot continue. Am I missing something or has this support
actually been dropped ?
Thanks
Gary Ernst
MainL
Hey, you call being asked once "nagged a little"? ;>)
So I wasn't very awake yesterday. It was Monday after all, with SHARE last
week and house guests over the weekend. And I had 454 e-mails to go
through. Mostly from this list.
"Only two things are infinite: the Universe and human stupidit
You're both right. Willem is right in pointing out when and where the
various system components are executed, and when their outputs are used, and
how that led to the failure. It's helpful for people to understand the
details in that manner. You're right in that essentially William was trying
t
Any links for tuning vm and linux for specific workloads?
Gordon Wolfe has graciously (after being nagged a little :) ) contributed
copies of his two SHARE 99 presentations:
Sess.PresenterTitle
9108 Gordon W. Wolfe, Ph.D. A Linux and/or VM Solution for Analyzing any
Web Server Log
9341 Gordon W. Wolfe, Ph.D. Managing a Penguin Farm o
I have applied the IBM patches to kernel 2.4.17 and re-built the s390
tools, run zipl rebooted and re-run zipl.
Now when I run zipl I get IPL for CMS reserved minidisks not supported
cannot continue. Am I missing something
or has support actually been dropped?
Gary Ernst
MainLine
At 17:21 27-08-02, Gary A. Ernst wrote:
>I Have installed kernel 2.4.17 and IBM patches as well as the s390-tools. Run
>zipl and rebooted When I run zipl again I get IPL form CMS reserved minidisks
>not supported cannot continue. Am I missing something or has this support
>actually been dropped ?
IBM and Droplets Invite You to Come See the Next Generation of Web Services
and Internet Applications
Where: Room 952 @ IBM Briefing Center, 590 Madison Ave, New York, NY
When: Friday, September 6, 2002.
Morning Session 9:00 to 11:00 a.m.
or
Mark,
No offense taken. Years ago kind people helped me learn VM... and now Linux. I try
to help people learn VM when I have the chance to do so. Turnabout is fair play, I
think!
What I'd like to do is pass on to you an updated how-to which can help others avoid
this in the future. Sound
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002 22:55, you wrote:
> he's not likely to repeat the mistake.
If he's like me, he will just find another creative way to stuff things up;-)
--
Cheers
John Summerfield
Microsoft's most solid OS: http://www.geocities.com/rcwoolley/
Here is what my Herc conf file looks like"
0E203088CTCI/dev/net/tun1500192.168.1.9 192.168.1.7
255.255.255.255
0E213088CTCI/dev/net/tun1500192.168.1.9 192.168.1.7
255.255.255.255
The address of : 192.168.1.9 "will be my new Suse (guest/lp
Rick,
I would have to say that there is precedent. In working on porting the SAP
database to Linux/390, I've come across numerous instances of files checking
for 64-bit and using /lib64, or /lib otherwise.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Rick Troth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: T
Of course. In no way do I want to be the only person contributing to those
HOWTOs. I don't have the time or opportunity to do that. I had been hoping
that more people would have contributed more of them than have already. I
recognize that most of us have pretty busy jobs, but I was still hopin
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 06:22:31PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Here is what my Herc conf file looks like"
>
> 0E203088CTCI/dev/net/tun1500192.168.1.9 192.168.1.7
> 255.255.255.255
> 0E213088CTCI/dev/net/tun1500192.168.1.9 192.168.1.7
>
Forgive me, I've not followed this thread and don't keep
a running log of this list like I do with Hercules-390 but
I happened to see the subject line. What kind of troubles
are you running into? I've not tested Hercules on the
Mandrake distro's and if there is problem, I'd like to find
it now a
A good friend
from a community shared by many on this list
often signs his e-mail "WIRDI", whatever is right, do it.
I'm trying to get a handle on the /lib and /lib64 mess.
At first, I was put off by SuSE's use of /lib64, but it may be
"the right thing". What do y'all think? What precede
General information:
http://www.vm.ibm.com
http://www.vm.ibm.com/perf/
http://www.vm.ibm.com/perf/tips/
Linux Performance when running under VM:
http://www.vm.ibm.com/perf/tips/linuxper.html
The performance book:
http://www.vm.ibm.com/pubs/pdf/hcsi1a50.pdf
And for the ability to manage workloads
/lib64 was mentioned in the Linux Filesystem Standard as an example in
footnote 12 from section 3.10 /lib. Here's a link:
http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.2.pdf
Hope that helps
Mike
25 matches
Mail list logo