Read good Marketing John, dig deep and you will see it is "pay me
consulting for ye hack"
Regards,
Jon
Jon R. Doyle
Sendmail Inc.
6425 Christie Ave
Emeryville, Ca. 94608
(o_
(o_ (o_ //\
(/)_ (\)_ V_/_
On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, John Summerfield wrote:
> On
On Mon, 11 Nov 2002 11:31, you wrote:
> I have too, it is my experience RH is new to the multi-platform
> capability, but they are not new to marketing, they are great at that, ala
> M$.
RH has had Alpha and Sparc for years I think in both 32 and 64-bit. Recently
it's culled some.
I'm slightly pu
Never seen thier Sparc port, wow, I fogot Alpha, and I run one here on my
desk, a Miata, good catch. Right they had a couple revs, last one CPQ had
to pay them to do it. Point being they are great for MKTing, but IMHO SuSE
has them cold on Engineering.
But, case in point, the Alpha, the best techn
Jon R. Doyle wrote:
I have too, it is my experience RH is new to the multi-platform
capability, but they are not new to marketing, they are great at that, ala
M$.
I don't think that Red Hat is new to non-IA32 archs at all. I'm sure
I'm getting my years wrong, but they did have an Alpha and Spa
>From what I read on the RH site the "other" ports are custom hacks,
supported through thier consulting. I know we have "boxed" kits here
in-house for:
SuSE
i-series
x-series (i386)
z-series
p-series
?-series 64bit
Builds or kits outside IBM
sparc
amd-64 (sledgehammer)
ppc-MAC
I have too, it i
On Mon, 11 Nov 2002 07:17, you wrote:
> SuSE and Red Hat both have a contractual obligation to provide Linux
> distributions across all of IBM's hardware lines.
How often do you happen to know? The latest I can see at RH's ftp site is:
ftp> dir 7.2/en/os
200 PORT command successful. Consider using
On Sun, 10 Nov 2002 22:27, you wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-11-10 at 01:55, John Summerfield wrote:
> > Is this a reason to not close down those avenues that are easy? Seems to
> > me that if you fix some, you have fewer left to fix.
> >
> > As the philospher said, a journey of a thousand leagues starts w
Ich werde außer Haus sein von 11/11/2002 Bis 06/12/2002.
In dringenden Fällen wenden Sie sich bitte an Herrn Wolfgang Flathmann
Anne,
I would say that more Linux/390 installations are SuSE than Red Hat because
SuSE had the "first to market" advantage in this case. Between the two,
SuSE is the only one with a GA 64-bit distribution for zSeries. My
understanding is that the gap in numbers is closing somewhat.
SuSE and Red
Hi,
I'm very inexperienced with S/390 Linux but have
downloaded a SuSE version and brought it up in an LPAR. I have the
impression (true?) that more sites, even in the US, use SuSE for S/390 than
Redhat, and I know I went to an IBM free class last month about Linux/390
applica
From: Ulrich Weigand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Linux on 390 Port <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: CPU Arch Security
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2002 17:55:53 +0100
Well, Linux has capabilities nowadays, but they aren't much used
in your typical distribution. There are also patche
Jan Jaeger wrote:
>I think that the real issue here is that Linux (or unix in general) does has
>litte to offer with regard to program capabilities (ref keykos/eros micro
>kernel designs). Under Linux, (acl based) one basically has all the
>authorisations of the user under which one is running.
On Sun, 2002-11-10 at 01:55, John Summerfield wrote:
> Is this a reason to not close down those avenues that are easy? Seems to me
> that if you fix some, you have fewer left to fix.
>
> As the philospher said, a journey of a thousand leagues starts with a single
> step.
>From a security view poin
I think that the real issue here is that Linux (or unix in general) does has
litte to offer with regard to program capabilities (ref keykos/eros micro
kernel designs). Under Linux, (acl based) one basically has all the
authorisations of the user under which one is running. (setuid programs
being
14 matches
Mail list logo
