On Sun, 2002-11-10 at 01:55, John Summerfield wrote:
Is this a reason to not close down those avenues that are easy? Seems to me
that if you fix some, you have fewer left to fix.
As the philospher said, a journey of a thousand leagues starts with a single
step.
From a security view point
Jan Jaeger wrote:
I think that the real issue here is that Linux (or unix in general) does has
litte to offer with regard to program capabilities (ref keykos/eros micro
kernel designs). Under Linux, (acl based) one basically has all the
authorisations of the user under which one is running.
From: Ulrich Weigand [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Linux on 390 Port [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: CPU Arch Security
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2002 17:55:53 +0100
Well, Linux has capabilities nowadays, but they aren't much used
in your typical distribution. There are also patches
Anne,
I would say that more Linux/390 installations are SuSE than Red Hat because
SuSE had the first to market advantage in this case. Between the two,
SuSE is the only one with a GA 64-bit distribution for zSeries. My
understanding is that the gap in numbers is closing somewhat.
SuSE and Red
Ich werde außer Haus sein von 11/11/2002 Bis 06/12/2002.
In dringenden Fällen wenden Sie sich bitte an Herrn Wolfgang Flathmann
On Sun, 10 Nov 2002 22:27, you wrote:
On Sun, 2002-11-10 at 01:55, John Summerfield wrote:
Is this a reason to not close down those avenues that are easy? Seems to
me that if you fix some, you have fewer left to fix.
As the philospher said, a journey of a thousand leagues starts with a
On Mon, 11 Nov 2002 07:17, you wrote:
SuSE and Red Hat both have a contractual obligation to provide Linux
distributions across all of IBM's hardware lines.
How often do you happen to know? The latest I can see at RH's ftp site is:
ftp dir 7.2/en/os
200 PORT command successful. Consider using
From what I read on the RH site the other ports are custom hacks,
supported through thier consulting. I know we have boxed kits here
in-house for:
SuSE
i-series
x-series (i386)
z-series
p-series
?-series 64bit
Builds or kits outside IBM
sparc
amd-64 (sledgehammer)
ppc-MAC
I have too, it is my
Jon R. Doyle wrote:
I have too, it is my experience RH is new to the multi-platform
capability, but they are not new to marketing, they are great at that, ala
M$.
I don't think that Red Hat is new to non-IA32 archs at all. I'm sure
I'm getting my years wrong, but they did have an Alpha and
Never seen thier Sparc port, wow, I fogot Alpha, and I run one here on my
desk, a Miata, good catch. Right they had a couple revs, last one CPQ had
to pay them to do it. Point being they are great for MKTing, but IMHO SuSE
has them cold on Engineering.
But, case in point, the Alpha, the best
On Mon, 11 Nov 2002 11:31, you wrote:
I have too, it is my experience RH is new to the multi-platform
capability, but they are not new to marketing, they are great at that, ala
M$.
RH has had Alpha and Sparc for years I think in both 32 and 64-bit. Recently
it's culled some.
I'm slightly
Read good Marketing John, dig deep and you will see it is pay me
consulting for ye hack
Regards,
Jon
Jon R. Doyle
Sendmail Inc.
6425 Christie Ave
Emeryville, Ca. 94608
(o_
(o_ (o_ //\
(/)_ (\)_ V_/_
On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, John Summerfield wrote:
On
12 matches
Mail list logo
