http://www.nethack.org/
Noll, Ralph wrote:
what does nethack do???
-Original Message-
From: Alan Cox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 1:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: nethack 3.4.1
Noll, did you read the subject? I can't find anything about Debian!
So it looks like your kernel hasn't support for smbfs.
Check smbfs in /proc/filesystems (what was included in the kernel) an
check file /lib/modules/YOUR-KERNEL-VERSION/kernel/fs/smbfs/smbfs.o - not
included, but presents as
No good is a bit harsh.
Files that are open at the time the backup is made may be corrupted.
The disk will look like it would if you yanked the plug on a running
system. This means that an fsck will certainly be required. It means
you *may* lose data. It means you really shouldn't rely on this
1) the answer to question one is, we don't know. We have little batch processing and
would like what little we have to be real-time, but that is another goal. So, moving
out of COBOL and off the mainframe has been part of the discussion. But, we have a
new 390 machine, so it would be a
Your COBOL programs can be made web aware through the CICS Web Support (CWS).
CWS comes delivered with CICS TS 1.1.1. Unfortunately it takes a little
philosophy change on the development end. There are vendor tools available
to mask that to various degrees. But either way, it is a ways off
On Thu, 2003-02-27 at 04:35, Noll, Ralph wrote:
what does nethack do???
Its a game. Sorry for the newer folk here I maintain an S/390 games rpm
archive.
Alan
--
Humanity has the stars in its future, and that future is too important
to be lost under the burden of juvenile folly and
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 10:56:26AM +0200, Sergey Korzhevsky wrote:
Noll, did you read the subject? I can't find anything about Debian!
So it looks like your kernel hasn't support for smbfs.
Check smbfs in /proc/filesystems (what was included in the kernel) an
check file
Hello,
I have an LVM configuration on SuSE Linux for S390 (2.2.16) consisting of:
20 - Logical Volumes
16 - Volume Groups
59 - Physical volumes
I tried adding about 50 more volumes to the configuration. This obviously
forced me into another dasd major number. I did mknod commands adding
Sergey Korzhevsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
zvmlinx4:/mnt # mount -t smbfs -o username=rnoll //10.201.18.9/cdrom
/mnt/cdrom
3481: session request to 10.201.18.9 failed (Called name not present)
3481: session request to 10 failed (Called name not present)
Password:
zvmlinx4:/mnt #
IIRC
Hello, list,
when installing sles7 31-bit, i get the following error
qeth: received an IDX TERMINATE on irq 0x0/0x1 with cause code 0x22 --
try another portname
here is some various things that i have gone through. i have successfully
installed this before, so i'm not quite sure what the
Hello Chris,
The parameter string is being built with a slight error (a comma where it
really needs a semicolon). I learned from Bernhard Kaindl that there is
a simple work-around for this. You can enter the add_parms information
when you are prompted for the list of device addresses:
Enter
Hello,
From some days ago when I reported a problem of PSW all 04s when loading
Debian/390 2.4.17 under an IBM 9672 R22, we did some homework under
VM and get a new situation. This is described bellow.
We go ahead using Debian/390 under VM/ESA 2.4.0 and updated it to new
level 2.4.19 and install
Hi, Ralph
Despite those apparent error messages, your mount might have been
successful. I got similar messages on a test I'm doing, and yet when I
issued mount the share actually showed up and was usable.
Richard Hitt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Noll, Ralph wrote:
works fine on a suse box.. just not
13 matches
Mail list logo
