Apache built just fine, that wasn't the problem.
Using the SLES8 distributed Apache and Tomcat together produced the
message:
Syntax error on line 228 of /etc/httpd/httpd.conf:
Cannot load /usr/lib/apache/mod_jk2.so into server:
/usr/lib/apache/mod_jk2.so: undefined symbol: apr_thread_mutex_trylo
Bravo!
-Original Message-
Totally off topic, but we'd like everyone to join us in congratulating Scott
Courtney for being one of the honored recipients of the 2003 NASPA Industry
Insight Awards.
We're pretty proud of him...8-). Nice job, Scott.
I have always started with a tar.gz file and done a configure, make and
make install. Most software rpms are a bit behind the tar,gz
distributions
Rich Smrcina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: Linux on 390 Port <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
02/17/2004 02:17 PM
Please respond to Linux on 390 Port
Actually yes there is. Try this site:
https://www6.software.ibm.com/dl/lxdk/lxdk-p
On Tue, 2004-02-17 at 20:09, Scorch Burnet wrote:
> we have just received sles8 64 bit and are installing under zVM running
> in 64 bit. Now someone tells me that there is no 64 bit jdk for the
> 390 port. is t
we have just received sles8 64 bit and are installing under zVM running
in 64 bit. Now someone tells me that there is no 64 bit jdk for the
390 port. is there any information to the contrary?
tia
On Tue, 2004-02-17 at 16:06, Richard Troth wrote:
> I'm looking over your script to see if there are
> "/usr isn't mounted yet" kinds of dependencies, like we see
> on the Linux hot-plug list occasionally. So far, so good.
Well, the only guarantee I can offer is that it works for me
Whic
No, SLES8 comes with Apache 1.3.26 (I think). We were getting a similar
message. There are no updates to either of these packages on the SuSE
download site.
On Tue, 2004-02-17 at 15:47, Ranga Nathan wrote:
> Was Apache 2.0x installed when you installed the Tomcat? From what you are
> saying, you
Rightfully so. Congrats!
On Tue, 2004-02-17 at 16:03, David Boyes wrote:
> Totally off topic, but we'd like everyone to join us in congratulating Scott
> Courtney for being one of the honored recipients of the 2003 NASPA Industry
> Insight Awards.
>
> We're pretty proud of him...8-). Nice job, S
Totally off topic, but we'd like everyone to join us in congratulating Scott
Courtney for being one of the honored recipients of the 2003 NASPA Industry
Insight Awards.
We're pretty proud of him...8-). Nice job, Scott.
-- db
David Boyes
Sine Nomine Associates
I'm looking over your script to see if there are
"/usr isn't mounted yet" kinds of dependencies, like we see
on the Linux hot-plug list occasionally. So far, so good.
I use an /etc/dcssblk.rc where you use an /etc/dcss.
The difference is that mine is a sourceable thing, looks like
"DCSSBLK_S
/bin/arch will return s390 for 31bit, s390x for 64bit.
-- db
David Boyes
Sine Nomine Associates
> -Original Message-
> From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Eric Sammons
> Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 10:13 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: How to determi
So, if you want filesystems mounted from DCSS automagically, you gotta
do a little setup.
This is for Debian but ought to be easily portable. You're looking to
modify the initial filesystem mounting in /etc/init.d.
Basically, you need to make sure that dcssblk and your shared segments
are ready
Was Apache 2.0x installed when you installed the Tomcat? From what you are
saying, you copied something from intel platform to os/390 platform?
You may have to rebuild Tomcat AFTER Apache is installed as it would
require Apache headers.
Rich Smrcina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: Linux on 390 Po
> That sounds like Lydia Pinckum's (renamed as Lilly the Pink by the Beetles)
The Scaffold.
--
Phil Payne
http://www.isham-research.com
+44 7785 302 803
That sounds like Lydia Pinckum's (renamed as Lilly the Pink by the Beetles)
original vegitable elixir, which contained a secret incredient which I
recently heard was 22% neat alchohol. The 22% was reduced by the US
government to 13% around the time of prohibition.
David Boy
> It's the cough syrup.
That's Cough Syrup (tm). When straight Scotch just doesn't cut it, use Cough
Syrup.
Recommended by quality consultants everywhere...8-)
-- db
PS -- Does not include Linux kernel hacking ability. Keep away from pets and
small children. Do not use externally. Mileage may
Ref: ftp://ftp.bmc.com/pub/linux/dcss-cms.html
Richard,
In your write up, you perform these steps:
> defseg segusr 1-3 sr
> pipe < segusr ext2 | storage 1000 805306368 e0
> saveseg segusr
What you need to avoid problems from CMS is:
CP DEFSEG SEGUSR 1-3 SR
SEGMENT RESERVE SE
I am trying to get Tomcat 4.0.4 (that comes with SLES8) to work with
Apache 2.0.48 (built from source).
Seperately they work just fine, but when I add the LoadModules
referencing mod_jk2.so (which is currently being used on an Intel
server) and restart Apache, I get the following:
Syntax error on
oracle 9.2.0.4 (9iR2 patchset 4) is certified.
> -Original Message-
> From: Rich Smrcina [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 12:39 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Fw: How to determine 31 bit or 64 bit installed?
>
>
> Careful there, some middleware may no
Careful there, some middleware may not be supported in 64-bit mode. It
may work OK, but it may not be supported. As far as I know the only IBM
software that is supported is TSM and Informix Dynamic Server. I would
check first.
On Tue, 2004-02-17 at 11:22, Ranga Nathan wrote:
> We are running OS
On Tue, 2004-02-17 at 11:48, Alan Altmark wrote:
> It's the cough syrup.
So *that*'s where it went.
Adam
I think it's a VFS or other Linux bug.
I've seen this with other block drivers when overmounting. Dunno why.
-- R;
A little weirdness with the DCSSBLK driver:
dcss2:~# mount /dev/dcssblk/USR /usr
mount /dev/dcssblk/USR /usr
dcss2:~# df
df
Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/dasd/0150/part1174248104572 60684 64% /
/dev/dasd/0151/part1396744360588 1567
On Tuesday, 02/17/2004 at 06:19 CET, Rob van der Heij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Alan Altmark wrote:
>
> >Be aware that loading the segment in exclusive-write mode will purge
the
> >existing segment, preventing any *subsequent* loading of the segment,
read
> >OR write. Existing users of the segm
Richard Troth wrote:
And I note that although Rob mentions two different methods,
neither of those matches what I did here. As Adam pointed out,
it will appear a bit convoluted. But it seems to work well.
Neat, Sir Santa. That certainly does the trick as well. You could even
make the pipe twe
Anything on the SLES8 disks: Perl, MySQL should work without a problem but
ISV or IBM supplied software may have to be upgraded. You can run 32-bit
apps on the 64-bit system, just that you won't exploit the storage
constraint relief if you do.
-Original Message-
We are running OS390 2.10 g
We are running OS390 2.10 going 64 bit upgrade in a month's time.
I guess that since we are running a Linux LPAR (not z/VM) we can upgrade
SuSE 8 to 64 bit anytime.
Has anyone got a checklist of what to do in SuSE 8 to upgrade to 64 bit?
We have MQ Series 5.3. Would that also have to be upgraded?
Alan Altmark wrote:
Be aware that loading the segment in exclusive-write mode will purge the
existing segment, preventing any *subsequent* loading of the segment, read
OR write. Existing users of the segment are unaffected.
He probably went out for lunch and Chucky grabbed the keyboard. I
believ
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, Post, Mark K wrote:
> This write-up, along with the subsequent exchange between you and Alan,
> would make a really nice addition to the HOWTOs page. Would you be willing
> to write this up in HTML format for that?
And I note that although Rob mentions two different methods,
The processor has to support 64-bit mode. When VM IPLs it will do so in
64-bit mode if the machine is a zSeries processor. You can verify this
with Q CPLEVEL.
On Linux issue uname -a. Towards the end of the response it will say
s390 (which is 32-bit) or s390x (which is 64-bit).
On Tue, 2004-02
Gross-simplication and containing half-truths: Your z/VM 4.4 needs to be
built as 64-bit or bi-architecture. The loader then gets to put the machine
in the correct mode (assuming you have a machine that can operate in that
mode). You then acquire a copy of 64-bit SLES8 and install in a virtual
mach
You don't need to reinstall VM. You might already be in 64 bit - do a Q
CPLEVEL.
Marcy Cortes
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric
Sammons
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 7:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] Fw: How to
So I need to have VM 4.4 64 Bit installed, then acquire a copy of SLES 8
64 Bit mode and install that?
Thanks!
Eric Sammons
(804)697-3925
FRIT - Unix Systems
"Ferguson, Neale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: Linux on 390 Port <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
02/17/2004 10:49 AM
Please respond to Linux on 390
Rob,
This write-up, along with the subsequent exchange between you and Alan,
would make a really nice addition to the HOWTOs page. Would you be willing
to write this up in HTML format for that?
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rob
Nope.
-Original Message-
From: Eric Sammons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 10:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] Fw: How to determine 31 bit or 64 bit
installed?
Can I install 64 bit SLES 8 into a Z900 running VM 4.4 31 Bit mode?
Eric Sammon
Can I install 64 bit SLES 8 into a Z900 running VM 4.4 31 Bit mode?
Eric Sammons
"Ferguson, Neale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: Linux on 390 Port <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
02/17/2004 10:28 AM
Please respond to Linux on 390 Port
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:
A 64-bit z/VM doesn't imply that the Linux you're installing will run in
64-bit mode. They are two different products. If you look through the
packages when you have the opportunity in YaST you see RPMs with .s390.rpm
or .s390x.rpm as their suffixes. The former is for the 32-bit architecture,
the l
Got it, I am running Under VM (31 Bit mode). How, what, and where would
I set or change to get VM to run 64 bit and have my SLES 8 install in 64
bit mode.
Thanks!
Eric Sammons
(804)697-3925
FRIT - Unix Systems
- Forwarded by Eric Sammons/RICH/FRS on 02/17/2004 10:18 AM -
Eric Sammons
How do I determine which install I have, 31 bit or 64 bit? My media
doesn't say and the install process does not ask for version.
Thanks!
Eric Sammons
Alan Altmark wrote:
SAVESEG also requires class E. The /save function of the driver was
designed assuming the Linux machine has class E privileges (from my
reading of the code), as it automatically issues the DEFSEG and SAVESEG
for you. If you don't want to give the Linux image class E, then the
Please see the "What's New" page at:
http://www10.software.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/linux390/whatsnew.shtml
for a change summary of the 2004-02-16 additions and changes to the
Linux for zSeries and S/390 developerWorks Web pages.
> OCOs for Red Hat:
- Recommended tape_3590 OCO modul
On Tuesday, 02/17/2004 at 12:03 CET, Rob van der Heij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> 2. The alternative approach is hat you first save a dummy DCSS. So take
> a MAINT user with large enough virtual machine size and issue the DEFSEG
> and SAVESEG just to save the DCSS with garbage). The Linux guest
>
Two additional classes have been added to the Velocity Software
calander for the "z/VM and Linux under z/VM performance workshop".
The new classes are:
April 26-29 in Mountain View, California, and
May 3-6 in New York City. Registration REQUIRED by March 15th.
The class in New York is likely the on
David,
Would you be able to recommend a good document for the implementation of
Kerberos and LDAP? Also, would this implementation be compatible with
Microsoft Windows? I am looking to cross as many platforms as possible
with a single solution.
Thank you!
Eric Sammons
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We run one IFL and with the hz_timer=1 setting we get 100 hundred messages,
with hz_timer=0 we get 3-10 messages approx. each second.
You can do better. The trick is that you need 300 mS between ticks for
z/VM to see you're idle and pack up your things. One might believe
Carsten Otte wrote:
Why would you want to use FS labels? Just make your DCSS have talkative
names!
I believe I would also be reluctant to have everyone look into the
segments to see whether they like it. But there would be room for some
additional mapping layer (so that you can do some manage
Argh. I wish I would have been more stubborn and unfriendly towards the
developer when I explained to him that both the way of working and the
documentation were unlike what we use to do on VM and thus would confuse
people and make them do things they don't want to do. Let me start from
the beginni
>I see greater use of FS labels coming from this.
>The driver will need to work with /proc/partitions
>because that is where 'mount' reads filesystem labels.
Why would you want to use FS labels? Just make your DCSS have talkative
names!
with kind regards
Carsten Otte
--
I saw screens of green,
48 matches
Mail list logo
