Re: z/VM LPAR Configuration Question

2004-10-24 Thread Vic Cross
On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 10:53:02AM -0400, Peter E. Abresch Jr. - at Pepco wrote: > Do I define the VM LPAR as Linux only? Short answer: yes. Longer answer: Defining an LPAR as Linux Only is what tells the system that you want that workload to be dispatched on IFLs -- what's the L in IFL stand f

Re: z/VM LPAR Configuration Question

2004-10-24 Thread Rich Smrcina
Yes, define it as Linux Only. This way the VM LPAR will use the IFL, which will also be used by any Linux environments that are running under z/VM. On Sun, 2004-10-24 at 09:53, Peter E. Abresch Jr. - at Pepco wrote: > We are running 2 SuSE Linux 8.1 SP03 in native LPARs using a new IFL. On > the

z/VM LPAR Configuration Question

2004-10-24 Thread Peter E. Abresch Jr. - at Pepco
We are running 2 SuSE Linux 8.1 SP03 in native LPARs using a new IFL. On the HMC, the Linux LPAR profiles specify âLINUX onlyâ under the general tab. We then select âNot dedicated integrated facility for Linuxâ to allow the two Linux LPARs to share the IFL. We are now getting ready to install z/V

Re: RACF LDAP Authentication using PAM - options and pitfalls?

2004-10-24 Thread Seader, Cameron
As I understand things, you can use PAM authentication in a couple of ways. Yes, Many ways. You can have the RACF LDAP directory server authenticate a user ID and password, but keep the user information local to the Linux (Name, home dir, default shell, GID, UID etc) or if you have a sufficiently