In above Page, next statement is written.
'RESERVE LINUX SWAP E6'
Is my recognition right?
No, the 'E' is because the device is accessed as 'filemode' E and the
6 specifies a specific way ot access mode for some applications (but
you don't need to specify that here).
Next question.
Where
OK. (scratches chin) Check out that electric bill. $200 per year
times 200 servers that were shut off. Only $4k.
You folks were certainly kind to me for not pointing out my mathematical
blunder. 200 servers times $200 = $40,000, not 4k. So, if you have a
z900 on the floor, and a Shark for
Hi all,
I've inherited a z/VM 4.4 where all guests have the same virtual NIC
configuration in PROFILE EXEC:
'COUPLE A000 TO SYSTEM SWITCH1'
'COUPLE A100 TO SYSTEM SWITCH2'
where SWITCH1 and SWITCH2 are two vswitch.
Penguins (SLES8) seems work fine, but the question is if this configuration
Looks fine to me. As a small tiny meaningless choice I would have used
something completely different for the second nic, like fffc-fffe.
Gianfranco Ciotti wrote:
Hi all,
I've inherited a z/VM 4.4 where all guests have the same virtual NIC
configuration in PROFILE EXEC:
'COUPLE A000 TO SYSTEM
That looks perfectly fine to me, since it's what we do. That's one of the
nice things about virtual machines. You can make them look the same,
reducing the amount of flailing around when you move from guest to guest,
trying to figure out what is what.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
Here is an interesting question
Over the decades, we have always talked about energy savings, like some
department manager cares.
In any of your shops, does IT actually pay for electricty? I've never
seen a budget item. I'ved never seen an invoice. In fact, I've never
seen the meter or
Hi, Rob
(B
(BThank you for your answer.
(BI look for documentations about VDISK.
(BDo you know them?(or URL?)
(B
(BThank you.
(B-
(BK.M.
(B
(B
(B
(B__
(BDo You Yahoo!?
(BUpgrade Your Life
(Bhttp://bb.yahoo.co.jp/
(B
thanks!
now... I can sleep calm dreams! ;))
Monday 11 April 2005 15:59, David Kreuter wrote:
Looks fine to me. As a small tiny meaningless choice I would have used
something completely different for the second nic, like fffc-fffe.
Monday 11 April 2005 16:06, Post, Mark K wrote:
That looks
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 09:15:00AM -0500, Tom Duerbusch wrote:
Now I don't know many department managers that would spend X dollars
out of their budget to save Y dollars in someone elses budget. You
might use the savings to justify the expenditure up the line, but the
savings are soft
This is government, no such thing as one person in charge.
We are a City and a County. The Mayor is in control of the City, and
another 8 elected offices are in the County (but no County supervisor).
So, there are 9 officials in charge. Not even the voters are in charge
as the State of Missouri
Without that line, the wheel group doesn't mean much (unless you're using
group permissions to limit use of su vs. using pam modules) and any user can
su to root (if they knew the password, of course).
lNoklL
- Original Message -
From: Adam Thornton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
On Apr 11, 2005, at 10:11 AM, Tom Duerbusch wrote:
Oh, btw, the City being it's own County, isn't the same thing as St.
Louis County, that is a different County. Confused yet?
No. Try harder.
Adam
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe /
On Apr 11, 2005, at 10:16 AM, NoëL AntoniO wrote:
Without that line, the wheel group doesn't mean much (unless you're
using
group permissions to limit use of su vs. using pam modules) and any
user can
su to root (if they knew the password, of course).
Sorry. Misunderstood the problem.
What you
When did we get /proc/sysinfo?
I think it was 2.4.something, but 2.4.what?
Thanks.
-- R;
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or
Often the department that owns the servers gets a square-foot charge flat
rate, adjusted each year. Power is a factor in that charge. The
server-owning department will get a reduced charge if they reduce power,
but it not immediately obvious. Perhaps if the server-owning manager
talked to the
In my case, I doupt anyone would spend the timeG. It all ends up
being soft money. Cost savings by a department is usually reused long
before the savings are realized.
Tom Duerbusch
THD Consulting
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/11/05 12:03 PM
Often the department that owns the servers gets a
I'm running SLES8/64bit using k_deflt-2.4.21-251 and vsftpd-1.1.0-21
connected via VSWITCH under zVM 5.1. When I try to initiate an FTP of a
200 MB file, I almost immediately drop my qeth connection. I am running
in a 5 GB virtual machine. If I drop down to a 2GB machine, it works ok.
Below
(I didn't see any answers to this and now don't see my question in the
archives, so here it is again in case it didn't make it before... Sorry
if it's a dup...)
Does anyone know of any real life experience presentations using Red
Hat? I can find a few sales type presentations, but nothing with
Actually, although it's less secure, I wouldn't mind if a non-wheel user
where able to su to a wheel-user, since they'd still need the passwords for
both wheel-user and root. (Right now, I'll take whatever I can get ;-)
lNoklL
- Original Message -
From: Adam Thornton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
According to the developerWorks web site, some time around 2.4.7. There's a
bug fix dated 11/23/2001 that talks about the module that implements it
being missing from the Makefile.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Richard Troth
Do you have VM63506 on your system. Your problem suspiciously sounds
like that one.
Best regards,
Pieter Harder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel +31-73-6837133 / +31-6-47272537
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 11-04-05 19:11
I'm running SLES8/64bit using k_deflt-2.4.21-251 and vsftpd-1.1.0-21
connected via VSWITCH
(please keep me on CC when replying)
Checking for NULL before calling kfree() on a pointer is redundant. This
patch drops such checks from arch/s390/
Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
extmem.c |8
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff -upr
I've also run into problems with 2GB virtual memory on SLES8/64-bit.
Unfortunately, I don't remember any details of this problem, as we've always
capped our machines to 2GB since then. However, I don't remember them being
related to vsftpd (not to say that it wasn't affected as well).
lNoklL
PS.
The only one I'm aware of is this one:
http://linuxvm.org/present/SHARE104/S9214mr.ppt
Most of the ones to date have been for SUSE, but I don't know that you'll
find much difference between the two.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Greg,
Of course, as far as I can throw you. :) I've added bootdisks/slack390.ins
files to all the versions on the download servers. If someone would like to
test, and inform me (offline) of success or failure, I would appreciate it.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390
Hi!
We are planning to use our 3494 tape library (with 3590 drives) from
Linux/390. It's a pity that IBM made only OCO drivers..and it doesn't
supports media changing... so the library manager is going to be network
attached (soon).
Do I have to write standard IBM label on the tapes?
Thanks:
26 matches
Mail list logo
