Neale Ferguson has released a new version of his cpint package,
cpint-2.4.0. It's available at
http://linuxvm.org/Patches/index.html#cpint
The ChangeLog lists the following:
- hcp.c - fix handling of response from CP to cater for non-displayable
characters
- cmdmain.c, idmain.c, monmain,c - Use G
Must've been a typo,
Mount /dev/dasd/0156/part1 -t ext2
Did the trick.
-Mike
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Michael Coffin
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 2:19 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Mounting Suse formatted disk on Debia
> I have a Debian Linux390 that mounts disks like this:
>
> Mount /dev/dasd/0156/part1
>
> And Suse Linux390 that mounts disks like this:
>
> Mount /dev/dasdn1
>
> If I want the Debian machine to link to the Suse machine's
> 0156 and mount it, what's the correct format of the mount
> command?
Th
Hi Folks,
I have a Debian Linux390 that mounts disks like this:
Mount /dev/dasd/0156/part1
And Suse Linux390 that mounts disks like this:
Mount /dev/dasdn1
If I want the Debian machine to link to the Suse machine's 0156 and mount it,
what's the correct format of the mount command? I've
tri
Floating around the zLinux world is the mksles9root by Mark. Once I got
other problems resolved, it worked fine.
But now I need the SLES9 SDK (gotta have Regina).
On the first system, I ftped the SDK over to that image, and mounted it
directly and, eventually, got regina. But really I would lik
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=hangcheck+rpm+sles
-Original Message-
From: mainframe_s390 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005 5:10 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Hangcheck timer on SLES9.
Thank you for answer.
Hangcheck timer is supplied as a rpm packa
Ismael,
> the process works very well.
Good to hear!
> I do have several questions:
>
> 1) I need to support both 31bit and 64bit linux. How do I leverage my
> current 31bit structure to support 64bit cloning process.
I would recommend creating a new 64-bit controller. It will require more
disk
I currently have suse sles 8 installed, and am trying to upgrade to
version 9. I have choosen the FTP option as my choice of install method.
I am able to manually connect via FTP from my sles 8 box to the
ftp-server on my PC using ftp commands. But when I try to use YaST to
set the installation sou
In looking for a simple and maintainable process to clone guests, I tried
the procedure in "vserver in 2 days" redbook.
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redpieces/abstracts/sg246695.html?Open
I started from a ready VM 5.1 system so I didn't have to install VM. Except
for my own mistakes, the process w
I did the same thing.
And still had the same type of problem there.
Turned out that the ftp server on SLES8, needed a configuration file
change. I seem to recall it was CHROOT (something about putting
something in jail). In other words, your root was to be based on your
home directory structure
I had success when I built the FTP server on a SLES8 virtual machine
server - eliminated any "wire" problems - went OSA to OSA although could
have gone hipersockets or guest lan.
David
Campbell, Breck wrote:
Thanks all. For now, it seems, we have traced to problem to our FTP server.
BPC
Thanks all. For now, it seems, we have traced to problem to our FTP server.
BPC
-Original Message-
From: Brian France [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 10:39 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: SLES 9 install problems
I've saw several anomalies with a sles
I've saw several anomalies with a sles 9 install.
First - Yes on the relative path. Had to use it.
Two - I could NOT for the life of me get the VNC to work. I even increased
the storage to something like 1024m. Somewhere I read info that VNC used
some figure. SO, I tried SSH and that worked. I w
On Monday, 05/23/2005 at 02:01 EST, "Little, Chris"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Trying to start the web interface. I get the following :
> FCXTCP575I Host IP address is 10.66.22.9:01066
> FCXTCP576E Error number 13 for BIND call
> Perfkit book saith thus :
> FCXxxx576E Error number nn for
We tried that, but it didn't work. In fact the results were identical.
BPC
-Original Message-
From: David Kreuter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 9:54 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: SLES 9 install problems
Well try specifying a relative path instead
Well try specifying a relative path instead of an absolute path,
../../mnt/cdrom
Check the Mike MacIsaac code mentioned in a few previous discussions on
setting up an install directory tree.
David
Campbell, Breck wrote:
When installing from the CDROM via FTP we can only get to the place where w
When installing from the CDROM via FTP we can only get to the place where we
make a terminal choice, we get this, which indicates that the system isn't
loaded completely. Any suggestions??:
Is the following correct?
Installation Source: ftp
IP-Address: 159.105.194.44
Directory: /mnt/cdrom
Ye
> We are looking for tools that would provide z/OS style automation to our
> mainframe linux servers.
Your solution would be System Automation for z/OS V2R3. From an SA focal point
running in z/OS, it provides automation of any remote zLinux guest, either
running native or under VM, in that local
In /etc/X11/xdm/xdm-config, comment out the last line (add the initial !):
Change:
DisplayManager.requestPort:0
to:
!DisplayManager.requestPort:0
I don't think xdm will start properly if this is set, since there's no local
display.
I know we had to do this to use xdm with a remote X
The one on my desk is O'Reilly's "Learning the bash Shell". There is also a
bash programming guide available at http://www.tldp.org/LDP/abs/html/. IBM has
a bash tutorial at http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/library/l-bash.html.
As in most cases, when looking for a topic like this, Google is
Leonard,
> I am wondering that suse had changed the default runlevel from 3 (sles7
& sles8) to 5 (sles9).
If you install a "minimal system", I don't think there is a difference
between 3 and 5:
# chkconfig --list | grep 3:on > runlevel3
# chkconfig --list | grep 5:on > runlevel5
# diff runlevel3
Leonard,
I believe the whole SLES9 product line is GUI-oriented, especially for
desktops. Even the documentation, which is delivered with the
zLinux-Distribution, covers the x86 world. So they didn't change the
settings for the s390 platform.
Regards,
Sebastian
--
> So, I attempt to do more work but nothing seems to work. Ideas?
I had the same problem. Wait 6-60 minutes. ;-) It takes a long time to finish.
Sebastian
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
Hi list,
I am wondering that suse had changed the default runlevel from 3 (sles7 &
sles8) to 5 (sles9).
We got trouble since we did not realized this change. Does anyone know the
reason for this ?
And: is there any documentation about this ?
Regards
Leonard Janus
Systems Programmer
ekom21
Kas
24 matches
Mail list logo
