On Tuesday, 06/06/2006 at 04:24 MST, "Spann, Elizebeth (Betsie)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Reposting again, hoping someone from DeveloperWorks may respond.
Betsie, I've forwarded your post to the right people.
Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM Endicott
Reposting again, hoping someone from DeveloperWorks may respond.
Betsie
From: Spann, Elizebeth (Betsie)
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 11:17 AM
To: 'Linux on 390 Port'
Subject: snIPL on zLinux
Hi,
Is anyone running snIPL on zLinux? This is a DeveloperWo
On Tue, 6 Jun 2006 12:33:35 -0400 Terry Spaulding said:
>Has anyone been able to have a coexistence with ECKD LVM non Multipathing
>and SCSi with LVM Multipathing ?
We use ECKD (non-LVM) and SCSI (LVM Multipathing) by changing /etc/evms.conf
as follows:
- Under "legacy_devices", remove "dasd?"
James,
> Did you try the -t flag? -t ext2 specifically?
Yes, many times:
# mount -t ext2 -o ro /dev/dasdd1 /mnt
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/dasdd1,
or too many mounted file systems
# mount -t ext2 -o noload /dev/dasdd1 /mnt
mount: wrong fs type, bad opti
Please join us for a half-day meeting of the Bay Bunch user group hosted by
Velocity Software, Jeskell and IBM. The Bay Bunch is a regional group
consisting of System z and Linux enthusiasts. This is a free meeting. If you
are interested in issues relating to System z and zLinux, you won't want to
Did you try the -t flag? -t ext2 specifically?
Michael MacIsaac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: Linux on 390 Port
To
Leland,
> You could try mounting it with the "noload" option.
Thanks, but no cigar - same error:
# mount -o noload /dev/dasdd1 /mnt
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/dasdd1,
or too many mounted file systems
"Mike MacIsaac" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (845) 433-7061
-
You could try mounting it with the "noload" option. Might work...never
tried it.
Leland
On 6/6/06 12:39 PM, "Michael MacIsaac" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I'm trying to mount an ext3 file system as ext2, I thought this could
> *always* be done, but I'm finding otherwise.
>
> I
Hello list,
I'm trying to mount an ext3 file system as ext2, I thought this could
*always* be done, but I'm finding otherwise.
I write to a disk on a "master" Linux and then want to link it read-only
on "clones". I use a LINK statement in the USER DIRECTory, use "(ro)" in
zipl.conf and "ro" in fs
> The zSeries LPARs can utilise dedicated Cryptographic processors, can
> zLinux/OpenSSH use these?
If the OpenSSL libraries were built with crypto support, yes. Most of
the distributors don't ship them this way, though. Also, the crypto
engines only help with certain algorithms; they're not gener
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alan Cox wrote:
>> The problem is that encrypting the datastream costs.
>
> I guess it does on slow processors, on a PC its scarcely noticable. You
> may find -c blowfish-cbc (or for v1 -c blowfish) gives much much better
> performance on legacy syste
I am trying to implement zFCP Multipathing on SLES9 SP3. This is under zVM
5.2.
The Linux guest is an existing Linux using ECKD disk which also has LVM non
multipathing on the ECKD.
I have no problem adding the zFCP with SCSI Lun. The problem is setting the
/etc/lvm/lvm.conf file filter to accept
> Or unmount, or [re]mount read-only.
Isn't really practical if the source system is actually active and doing
useful stuff. Having /usr go missing mid-stream tends to ruin an
application's whole day, even if the system would let you unmount an
active filesystem...8-)
> I don't like the idea of a
Ar Gwe, 2006-06-02 am 08:47 +0800, ysgrifennodd John Summerfied:
> I've recently discovered that, while it's extremely convenient, that
> it's also slow on fast networks.
>
> The problem is that encrypting the datastream costs.
I guess it does on slow processors, on a PC its scarcely noticable. Yo
McKown, John wrote:
Please be kind. I don't have a z/Linux system around. But I know that
you cannot share a filesystem between two z/Linux instances in
read/write mode and hope to keep a usable filesystem (in the general
case). I wonder why the dasd driver cannot (or does it?) implement an
"ioct
David Boyes wrote:
I am talking about *two* LPARs: one is up and running, and I want a
second
test system in a separate LPAR.
Making updates and test on the test system - copying over to the
production system. Similar to the
method we also use for z/os ...
You can share DASD between Linux
Nix, Robert P. wrote:
Having Linux up in a zOS partition would be a neat trick, unless you brought
zOS down first... Are you talking about a separate LPAR on your system, or did
you mean zVM?
You can share DASD between Linux instances, as long as the disk is read-only to
all Linux images that
James Melin wrote:
Way back in the day, I used FP 98 (again that's what was sanctioned, regardless
of how lousy a product it is) back in the day, and that invoked a real
FTP conversation irrespective of there being a web server involved. Is there
any way to get FP 2003 to just DO what I want i
Nix, Robert P. wrote:
I'd say that your best bet (and speediest method to get up and running) would
be to just install Linux again on the second LPAR, and do the same
customizations you did on the first one. Cloning takes some additional planning
and setup before you'd be able to successfully
19 matches
Mail list logo
