What does your routing table look like?
Kim Goldenberg wrote:
We are starting our Linux POC and all has been going well. Until I got
to the Hipersockets, that is.
We are trying to talk to two z/OS LPARs, one development and one
production. in our IFL
LPAR, z/VM 5.2 RSU 0701 and SLES9x SP3. POC
>>> On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 3:43 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kim Goldenberg
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We are starting our Linux POC and all has been going well. Until I got
> to the Hipersockets, that is.
-snip-
> z/OS -- OSA -- network -- OSA -- Linux (on vswitch)
>
> Wanted:
>
> z/
Of course this is Alan's very own perspective that I don't share.
We should support GDPS/XRC also with z/VM. No doubt about that to me.
But to be fair, it is not only about z/VM time-stamping its I/O but
also participating in an ETR/STP-based time synchronization with
z/OS such that it facilitates
Bob & David,
I understand and share your frustration in regard to this particular
issue. However, let me please assure this is not about stepchild'ing
the z/VM environment and/or not understanding the necessity for z/VM
being a critical part of an end-to-end managed structure. Instead it
is about
also check that the MTU sizes match.
David
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port on behalf of Rich Smrcina
Sent: Fri 6/29/2007 11:51 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Hipersockets Conundrum
So are your OSA devices and Hipersocket devices all on the same network?
In other
