Re: Fixed i/O Buffers......LOZ

2007-10-17 Thread Rob van der Heij
On 10/18/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, can any one help me in testing the Fixed I/O buffers in Linux on Z.. > I have very less info abt Fixed buffers, so let me know frm where I can get > more info abt the same. Asking your question here is probably the best approach

Fixed i/O Buffers......LOZ

2007-10-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, can any one help me in testing the Fixed I/O buffers in Linux on Z.. I have very less info abt Fixed buffers, so let me know frm where I can get more info abt the same. Thanks Rajasekhar duddu. - Get your free Email ID

Re: Unkown multicast packets with unknown mac address

2007-10-17 Thread John Summerfield
Mark Post wrote: On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 2:26 PM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Boyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -snip- Given that SHARE doesn't seem to want this content Eh? I never said that. I said the SHARE _attendees_ don't seem to want content like this. When we put on sess

Re: Unkown multicast packets with unknown mac address

2007-10-17 Thread Mark Post
>>> On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 2:26 PM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Boyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -snip- > Given that SHARE doesn't seem to want this content Eh? I never said that. I said the SHARE _attendees_ don't seem to want content like this. When we put on sessions of this le

Re: Unkown multicast packets with unknown mac address

2007-10-17 Thread Stephen Frazier
Mark, Rich says that he has room for you to do a session at WAVV in Chattanooga. :) If you did I bet that Bobby would attend it. :) Rich Smrcina wrote: If there's a warm body to present them with relevant content, I'll slot them. There are slots available for Chattanooga. Mark Post wrote:

Re: Unkown multicast packets with unknown mac address

2007-10-17 Thread Rich Smrcina
If there's a warm body to present them with relevant content, I'll slot them. There are slots available for Chattanooga. Stephen Frazier wrote: It sounds like it should be a WAVV session. If WAVV starts offering Linux technical sessions that are not available anywhere else it might increase WAV

Re: Unkown multicast packets with unknown mac address

2007-10-17 Thread Mark Post
>>> On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 2:38 PM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Stephen Frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It sounds like it should be a WAVV session. If WAVV starts offering Linux > technical sessions that > are not available anywhere else it might increase WAVV attendance. As much as I

Re: Unkown multicast packets with unknown mac address

2007-10-17 Thread Stephen Frazier
It sounds like it should be a WAVV session. If WAVV starts offering Linux technical sessions that are not available anywhere else it might increase WAVV attendance. David Boyes wrote: Marcy's idea of having a session just on the document is interesting, but our experience has been that sessio

Re: Unkown multicast packets with unknown mac address

2007-10-17 Thread David Boyes
> Marcy's idea of having a session just on the document is interesting, but > our experience has been that sessions on advanced Linux topics draw very, > very few people. With SHARE's continued emphasis on reducing the number > of sessions per attendee ratio, we would be hard pressed to justify it

Re: IBM list of Linux for System z ISVs

2007-10-17 Thread Kielek, Samuel
Red Hat has a pretty good site for this purpose. It's RHEL specific of course. Here's the link: https://www.redhat.com/apps/isv_catalog/results.html?pgqty=10&criteria=&; page_view=by_rhel&platform_code=240&platform_code=150&platform_code=140& platform_code=90&platform_code=70&sort=5&pg=0 -Sam -

Re: IBM list of Linux for System z ISVs

2007-10-17 Thread Mark Post
>>> On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 8:21 PM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mark Post wrote: > Ok, I have a link on linuxvm.org that points to > http://www.ibm.com/eserver/zseries/solutions/s390da/linuxproduct.html > This _used_ to be a nice little page that listed all the ISVs that had > products tha

Re: Unkown multicast packets with unknown mac address

2007-10-17 Thread Mark Post
>>> On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 8:48 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Bauer, Bobby (NIH/CIT) [E]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I did a quick browse of that manual. What an eye opener. Wish they had > bothered to mention these things at some of the many Linux Share > sessions I attended in San Die

Re: Unkown multicast packets with unknown mac address

2007-10-17 Thread Marcy Cortes
That one should be required reading for anyone working with Linux on z. It tells you how to operate all your devices! I think the title with the words "device drivers" in it probably scares everyone away. I'll add a reference to it in my SHARE presentation :) Might be a good whole session tho

Re: PDF viewing alternatives (plus Flash by the way)

2007-10-17 Thread Patrick Spinler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 For what it's worth, these folks: http://davelargo.blogspot.com/ Are doing largely what you suggest, but on intel, not Z. Anecdotally, they spend a *lot* of time tuning CPU performance for the apps running on the servers. Many of his blog posts

Re: zip/unzip preserve uid/gid?

2007-10-17 Thread Bill Dodge
> You want oracle to copy anything at all? Bad example. I copied the sudoer line from an oracle database only machine. There isn't anything but RedHat and Oracle on it. -- Bill Dodge email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (703)627-2455 "If you don't know where you are going, any road will take you

Re: Unkown multicast packets with unknown mac address

2007-10-17 Thread Bauer, Bobby (NIH/CIT) [E]
I did a quick browse of that manual. What an eye opener. Wish they had bothered to mention these things at some of the many Linux Share sessions I attended in San Diego recently. Bobby Bauer Center for Information Technology National Institutes of Health Bethesda, MD 20892-5628 301-594-7474 -

Re: Unkown multicast packets with unknown mac address

2007-10-17 Thread Mark Perry
Bauer, Bobby (NIH/CIT) [E] wrote: I got it working. Not sure if I understand the results yet. Thanks for the pointer. Bobby, this is easy on SLES 10, but you are correct that is is not on RHEL 5 :-( However you can use the qeth fake_ll=1 option to fake out the missing LLC headers. For example

Re: Unkown multicast packets with unknown mac address

2007-10-17 Thread Bauer, Bobby (NIH/CIT) [E]
I got it working. Not sure if I understand the results yet. Thanks for the pointer. Bobby Bauer Center for Information Technology National Institutes of Health Bethesda, MD 20892-5628 301-594-7474 -Original Message- From: Mark Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 17

Re: Unkown multicast packets with unknown mac address

2007-10-17 Thread Bauer, Bobby (NIH/CIT) [E]
No, being new to Linux I'm not familiar with that. I just Googled it and got lots of hits. We have Red Hat 5. Any idea if it is included or where? Can you tell me how to use it? Thanks Bobby Bauer Center for Information Technology National Institutes of Health Bethesda, MD 20892-5628 301-594-747

Re: Unkown multicast packets with unknown mac address

2007-10-17 Thread Mark Perry
Bauer, Bobby (NIH/CIT) [E] wrote: Any suggestions on what this is or where to look would be appreciated. Have you tried using tcpdump-qeth ? Mark -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email

Unkown multicast packets with unknown mac address

2007-10-17 Thread Bauer, Bobby (NIH/CIT) [E]
Cross posted to Linux-390 and TCP We have a new (our first and only) Linux system running in lpar mode on an IFL with a couple of OSA cards. While debugging a routing issue we noticed using TCPDUMP a HUGE amount of traffic. Using Ethereal we captured some packets and discovered thousands of multic