Anatol,
Since you'll be outside of z/OS you'll have to use some sort of socket
based communications mechanism.
There may be a few ways to tackle this:
- Teach the MVS application to talk to a socket and listen for
connections from the Linux application
- Write another application to do the list
I'm new to this list, and the FAQ link doesn't work, so please excuse
possible redundancy.
We have a C++ application on USS, which communicates with an MVS
application via a shared memory segment and binary semaphores.
Presently we're contemplating porting that application to Linux on IFL.
I wonde
On Feb 15, 2008, at 9:33 PM, Dennis Foreman wrote:
The make-kpkg itself gave a good return code, but after I did the
shutdown/restart and ran BOOTDEB, it hung, trying to find its tty
device.
Make sure you have a static /dev/console, which is a character device,
major 5, minor 0 on your initrd.
The make-kpkg itself gave a good return code, but after I did the
shutdown/restart and ran BOOTDEB, it hung, trying to find its tty device.
Is there any information I could post that would help figure this out?
Regards,
DJ Foreman
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL
On Feb 15, 2008, at 7:05 PM, Dennis Foreman wrote:
Hello,
I hope this is the place posting this question. If not, I hope you
can point
me in the right direction.
I am teaching a course in Operating Systems. My class is using
Debian Etch
on z/VM and each student will be required to re-build the k
Hello,
I hope this is the place posting this question. If not, I hope you can point
me in the right direction.
I am teaching a course in Operating Systems. My class is using Debian Etch
on z/VM and each student will be required to re-build the kernel with
his/her own changes. Is there a set of inst
On Feb 15, 2008, at 4:48 PM, Edmund R. MacKenty wrote:
I don't know the details of how each filesystem works, so
I'm probably wrong about this, but I suspect that the "reiserfs"
type of
filesystem would do better than "ext2", because reiserfs uses a B-tree
internally to avoid linear searches thro
On Friday 15 February 2008 16:16, Aria Bamdad wrote:
>I have a general Linux question that could apply to any platform.
>
>From a performance standpoint, would linux perform better if you
>have two filesystems each with N million files or one file system
>with N*2 million files on it. This would b
> >From a performance standpoint, would linux perform better if you
> have two filesystems each with N million files or one file system
> with N*2 million files on it. This would be purely the way the
> file systms are maintained by Linux. Please ignore performance due to
> different drives/chann
Hi,
I have a general Linux question that could apply to any platform.
>From a performance standpoint, would linux perform better if you
have two filesystems each with N million files or one file system
with N*2 million files on it. This would be purely the way the
file systms are maintained by L
Hi
So the bacula-sd config file is something like this,
Changer command - /etc/bacula/mtx-changer.pl - arguments -
Changer device = vmhost:50200
.
.
archive device = /dev/ntibm0
Tape labels = ANSI
Check labels = Yes
Regards
From: Linux on 390 Port on beha
Ok, point taken... Some people may argue that DB2 on z/OS is the
perfect solution, I tend to disagree. But at least customers could be
offered a choice, and I don't consider DB2 on AIX or Windows or even
Linux on Intel a choice.
Mark Perry wrote:
Rich Smrcina wrote:
It's pretty sad that DB2 U
Rich Smrcina wrote:
It's pretty sad that DB2 UDB on Linux for System z isn't supported, that
would be a very perfect solution.
I'm curious, what's the difference between "perfect" and "very perfect"?
Perfectionist ;-)
mark
--
It's pretty sad that DB2 UDB on Linux for System z isn't supported, that
would be a very perfect solution.
Max Bage wrote:
I'was reading an announcement from RedHat and SAP about certification
and support on Linux for System z. Does anyobody know if this support is
also for DB on Linux for Syste
IBM does not support changer access for channel attached tape drives on
Linux for Z. You have to get another virtual machine to help out -- thus the
tools that Adam wrote.
The PDF file included with the BACULATM execs describes the setup in detail.
There are examples in that document that came fro
On Feb 15, 2008, at 7:06 AM, Bruce Arro wrote:
Hi All
I`m trying to get a 3490 tape drive working with bacula from VM.
This is where I am.
Installed the Z/vm utilities. BACULATM and RAWBACULA and well as the
labeling utilities.
I can get the tape online from Linux with the command chccwdev -
Hi All
I`m trying to get a 3490 tape drive working with bacula from VM.
This is where I am.
Installed the Z/vm utilities. BACULATM and RAWBACULA and well as the labeling
utilities.
I can get the tape online from Linux with the command chccwdev - e 0.0.0181.
But when I run ./btape -c /etc
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 10:04 AM, Jose Raul Baron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why is it that there's the same problem everywhere ?
> Life would be much easier and problems could be solved faster and better
> with just some more DASD but it seems like the management guys must create
> the dasd
Why is it that there's the same problem everywhere ?
Life would be much easier and problems could be solved faster and better
with just some more DASD but it seems like the management guys must create
the dasd themselves...
>From time to time drop a little BOO !! to them for them to realize EVERYON
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:26 PM, Jim Elliott
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For the most part my view is from observation, not actual
> studies. And as Mark pointed out, we are talking about two REAL
> processors here with a Virtual 2-way running on it. IBM
> recommends that you always run Domi
In order to have not just a VG but a full backup (that is, security 100%):
Just in case that it might help, we have 3 identical Linux images for
different purposes (Real, Mirror and Test) running DB2 Databases that we DDR
from one system to another every day so that we can test any innovation in
t
21 matches
Mail list logo
