>>> On 8/11/2009 at 12:39 PM, And Get Involved wrote:
> There is a new redbook Achieving High Availability on Linux for System z
> with Linux-HA Release 2
> http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/pdfs/sg247711.pdf
>
> My question is that is it the popular high availability solution on SLES?
I don
I would recommend talking to an Oracle representative directly about this
because there tends to float a whole lot of information around (sometimes
even by techs) that may or may not be entirely accurate. Best bet is to
go to the source.
Kris
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 04:16:42PM -0500, Jam
I've heard this here in Brazil too.I can not say why but Oracle Sales people
are telling to my customers that 1 IFL of z10 = 4 Oracle Licenses.
Regards.
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 6:38 PM, Mark Post wrote:
> >>> On 8/11/2009 at 5:25 PM, Stewart Thomas J
>
> wrote:
> > A z10 processor has 4 core
>>> On 8/11/2009 at 5:25 PM, Stewart Thomas J
wrote:
> A z10 processor has 4 cores, but each IFL/ZIIP/ZAAP/GP is really only one of
> those cores. So licensing for an IFL should count as one Oracle license (1
> core). One other thing you'll find is that they have a multiplier depending
> on t
A z10 processor has 4 cores, but each IFL/ZIIP/ZAAP/GP is really only one of
those cores. So licensing for an IFL should count as one Oracle license (1
core). One other thing you'll find is that they have a multiplier depending on
the core type/speed. I think the multiplier for z hardware is 100
I was on a conference call with a couple of Oracle techs who said that
Oracle is licensed on a "per core" basis, so that each IFL on a z/10 would
count as 4 full price Oracle licenses. Has anyone else had experience with
this? Is this correct?
Thanks,
Jim P.
--
Yes - doing this either in the PROFILE EXEC or the directory would eliminate
the issue... we were trying to get it working dynamically before we
'hardcoded it' ;-) So this is just a gotcha for dynamic
define/coupling... Thanks for your post!
Scott
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Steffen M
On 08/11/2009 04:54 PM, Brad Hinson wrote:
> As to why layer3/IP mode isn't working, it could be my setup, but I
> noticed this on the console when I brought the nic online with echo 1 >
> /sys/bus/...:
>
> HCPIPN2833E Error 'E00A'X adding IP address 192.168.7.3 for VSWITCH
> SYSTEM VSW2.
> HCPIPN
On 08/11/2009 08:31 PM, Scott Rohling wrote:
> #CP DEFINE NIC 900 TYPE QDIO#CP COUPLE 900 GUESTA MYLAN
>
> eth2 came up automatically on Linux and once I did the above on both guests
> - it worked and I can ping using IP.
>
> So - can you 'stack' commands using the vmcp within Linux?
Hm, don't k
I got this working.. and the secret was eliminating the time between the
'define nic' and the 'couple'.. When I did the define nic - I saw messages
on the console that it recognized 900 as a QDIO, etc -- but failed to
register the IP address and some other messages.
So - I tried logging into t
>>> On 8/11/2009 at 11:53 AM, Lionel Dyck wrote:
> I have SMT configured and one client to experiment with. When I look at
> mail I have a message from smt that I can't explain:
>
> Subject: Cron /usr/sbin/smt-agent
> ...
> Error: Configuration doesn't allow to connect to
> https://secure-www.n
I think this may be a first. An Information Week article that I don't have any
real heartburn with reading.
http://www.informationweek.com/news/hardware/supercomputers/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=218900192
Mark Post
--
For LI
There is a new redbook Achieving High Availability on Linux for System z
with Linux-HA Release 2
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/pdfs/sg247711.pdf
My question is that is it the popular high availability solution on SLES?
Do you think it is good practice for the clustering WAS?
This messa
>>> On 8/11/2009 at 11:50 AM, Lionel Dyck wrote:
> Mark - thanks
>
> You didn't mention it but I presume SLESxx-Patches are patches since GA?
I don't see any such channel. Patches since GA (but prior to any service
packs) would be in SLESxx-Updates.
> Is there a doc or white paper with usag
I have SMT configured and one client to experiment with. When I look at
mail I have a message from smt that I can't explain:
Subject: Cron /usr/sbin/smt-agent
...
Error: Configuration doesn't allow to connect to
https://secure-www.novell.com
Yet I don't have that server defined anywhere (that I
Mark - thanks
You didn't mention it but I presume SLESxx-Patches are patches since GA?
Is there a doc or white paper with usage examples?
Lionel B. Dyck, z/Linux Virtualization Specialist
IBM Global Services - Kaiser Permanente Team
Linux on System z Service Delivery Team
925-926-5332 (8-473-
I set this up and was unable to get it working at first, too. As a
test, I destroyed everything then recreated the GuestLAN with the 'eth'
keyword to test layer2. Then I added OPTIONS="layer2=1" and
MACADDR=<> to ifcfg-ethX. With the GuestLAN in layer2
mode, I can ping successfully.
As to why
We want to establish a small private subnet that some guests can use to
communicate with between themselves, with all ports open...
On guest A:
vmcp define lan mylan type qdio
vmcp define nic 900 type qdio
vmcp couple 900 to guesta mylan
We have an ifcfg-eth2 (this is redhat) that gives an addre
My mistake...
The file I have is MONWRITE output not PERFSVM...
-Original Message-
From: Rob van der Heij [mailto:rvdh...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 12:09 PM
To: offerbar...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: z/Linux dasd performance issue
2009/8/11 עופר ברוך :
> 2. PERFSVM ou
Hello again,
I have some files I want to send but they are big.
1. Excel output from the iozone program (on my z/VM test environment)-
the test is on a redhat 5.2 machine with 512 MB of RAM. There are 2 test with
different I/O schedulers (1 - fcq and 2 - deadline). I have to mention t
20 matches
Mail list logo
