Ah, unless it is the monitoring tool which imbeds itself ...
We may have a winner here (or loser as the case may be).
Marcy
"This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you
are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must
not use, copy
It's just Java being Java ;)
Patrick Carroll | Enterprise Architect
L.L.Bean, Inc.(r) | Double L St. | Freeport ME 04033
http://www.llbean.com | pcarr...@llbean.com | 207.552.2426
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments may contain
confidential information that is legally
>>> On 3/11/2010 at 06:14 PM, Marcy Cortes
>>> wrote:
> Bad bad bad.
>
> So would you blame the j2ee app or IBM Websphere and it's java? Or is there
> not enough to tell here?
I would say it has to be the Java implementation, unless Java application
programmers are in-lining assembler code
Bad bad bad.
So would you blame the j2ee app or IBM Websphere and it's java? Or is there
not enough to tell here?
Marcy
"This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you
are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must
not use, copy
It was doing a MVCLE 4,2 (a842)
R2 - 0 so it was trying to reference page 0.
On 3/11/10 5:59 PM, "Marcy Cortes" wrote:
Mar 11 04:36:00 cpzpv17020 kernel: Low-address protection: 0004 [#1]
Mar 11 04:36:00 cpzpv17020 kernel: CPU:1Not tainted (2.6.5-7.317-s390x
200905261627510200)
Ma
Mar 11 04:36:00 cpzpv17020 kernel: Low-address protection: 0004 [#1]
Mar 11 04:36:00 cpzpv17020 kernel: CPU:1Not tainted (2.6.5-7.317-s390x
200905261627510200)
Mar 11 04:36:00 cpzpv17020 kernel: Process java (pid: 11073, task:
7c7ee070, ksp: 4b5835c8)
Mar 11 04:36:00 cpzpv
Linux on 390 Port wrote on 03/11/2010 01:02:16
PM:
> John Schnitzler Jr/Endicott/i...@ibmus
> Sent by: Linux on 390 Port
>
> 03/11/2010 01:02 PM
>
> Please respond to
> Linux on 390 Port
>
> To
>
> LINUX-390@vm.marist.edu
>
> cc
>
> Subject
>
> Re: FCP Direct connect vs. SAN fabric...
>
> >Isn'
>Isn't there (wasn't there?) a statement from IBM saying that direct
>connect of FCP to storage (i.e., a DS8000 or EMC DMX) is supported "for
>demonstration purposes only" -- or something like that?
>
>I thought I read somewhere that only fabric was supported for production
>work. But now can't l
>>> On 3/11/2010 at 12:13 PM, Lee Stewart
>>> wrote:
> Isn't there (wasn't there?) a statement from IBM saying that direct
> connect of FCP to storage (i.e., a DS8000 or EMC DMX) is supported "for
> demonstration purposes only" -- or something like that?
>
> I thought I read somewhere that only
I suspect the main reason is that a big part of NPIV is implemented by zoning
in the switch. So without switch it is rather difficult to control who whacks
what. Not a very good idea in a production environment.
Best regards,
Pieter Harder
pieter.har...@brabantwater.nl
tel +31-73-6837133 / +31
Isn't there (wasn't there?) a statement from IBM saying that direct
connect of FCP to storage (i.e., a DS8000 or EMC DMX) is supported "for
demonstration purposes only" -- or something like that?
I thought I read somewhere that only fabric was supported for production
work. But now can't lay my
Thanks for the info, taking a look at it.
#Floyd Rodery
DoD - DISA - DECC MECH
CDB 12 Linux on System z
717.605.8639 | 430.8639
floyd.rod...@csd.disa.mil
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:linux-...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Barton Robinson
Sent: Wednesday, March 10,
Xposted announcement for http://neuvm.org
As in the past this meeting will be available via callin as provided by VICOM.
888-245-8770 passcode 206580. 10AM until 15:40.
This allows those whom cannot attend in person to benefit from the
presentations.
Please checkout our agenda and register (
13 matches
Mail list logo
