Re: How to convince others. Was: Re: mono keep guest active - ban the blips.

2010-08-20 Thread Rob van der Heij
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 12:40 AM, Berry van Sleeuwen wrote: > Nagios is in use at the server side. Each client (our servers) has the > nagios client, with scipting instead of the nagios plugins, and sec. While parts of the Nagios user interface are pretty slick, it just does not scale. While the

z/Linux Oracle RAC references?

2010-08-20 Thread Tom Burkholder
z/VM, z/Linux'ers using Oracle, Are there any users of z/VM and z/Linux running an "Oracle RAC" implementation that would be willing to talk to a few people as an informal reference? It could be confidential with no commitment nor further obligations other than a few questions. It'd be a smal

Re: How to convince others. Was: Re: mono keep guest active - ban the blips.

2010-08-20 Thread Rogério Soares
forget David.. i figured out now... 2010/8/20 Rogério Soares > David, > > i'm confuse now... nagios 3 will be able to comunicate with zvm "directely" > or you talking about a especific plugin using vmcp ou something like this ? > Sorry if i ask something obvious... > > > > On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 a

Re: How to convince others. Was: Re: mono keep guest active - ban the blips.

2010-08-20 Thread Rogério Soares
David, i'm confuse now... nagios 3 will be able to comunicate with zvm "directely" or you talking about a especific plugin using vmcp ou something like this ? Sorry if i ask something obvious... On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 11:12 AM, David Boyes wrote: > > It's smart enough to know that *z/VM* ha

Re: How to convince others. Was: Re: mono keep guest active - ban the blips.

2010-08-20 Thread David Boyes
> It's smart enough to know that *z/VM* has allocated it an absolute > share? It does have the ability to set time of day/shift-based parameters. As to the z/VM part, come to OLF and see. 8-) -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signo

Re: How to convince others. Was: Re: mono keep guest active - ban the blips.

2010-08-20 Thread Rich Smrcina
It's smart enough to know that *z/VM* has allocated it an absolute share? On 08/20/2010 05:13 AM, David Boyes wrote: If only the monitor could 'know' that the machine was running this batch load at a certain time of day and had an absolute share and was running 100% for an extended period of ti

Re: How to convince others. Was: Re: mono keep guest active - ban the blips.

2010-08-20 Thread David Boyes
> If only the monitor could 'know' that the machine was running this > batch load at a > certain time of day and had an absolute share and was running 100% for > an extended > period of time. It could be set up to not sent out alerts based on all > of these > criteria. Wow! That would be a very

Re: How to convince others. Was: Re: mono keep guest active - ban the blips.

2010-08-20 Thread van Sleeuwen, Berry
You know it, I know it. But some people tend to believe only what they *think* they know. In this case unfortunalty the monitoring team is regarded as the specialist and I'm 'only' a VM sysprog. I have proven *) on several occasions that the numbers are off, in some case even way off but still they