Re: Stupid C compiler question

2010-10-22 Thread Mark Pace
Thank you both for the explanations. Have a great weekend. On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Mark Post wrote: > >>> On 10/22/2010 at 02:54 PM, Mark Pace wrote: > > I want to start learning C programming. When I go into yast and search > for > > a compiler I see these lines. What is the differn

Re: Stupid C compiler question

2010-10-22 Thread Mark Post
>>> On 10/22/2010 at 02:54 PM, Mark Pace wrote: > I want to start learning C programming. When I go into yast and search for > a compiler I see these lines. What is the differnce between these 2? > > *gcc43*The GNU C Compiler and Support Files > *gcc *The system

Re: Stupid C compiler question

2010-10-22 Thread Mark Pace
Both show as version 4.3 on my system. SLES SP-1 If I select gcc then yast also auto-magically selects gcc43. If I select gcc43 it does not also select gcc. 2010/10/22 McKown, John > > -Original Message- > > From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:linux-...@vm.marist.edu] On > > Behalf Of Mark

Re: Stupid C compiler question

2010-10-22 Thread McKown, John
> -Original Message- > From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:linux-...@vm.marist.edu] On > Behalf Of Mark Pace > Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 1:55 PM > To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU > Subject: Stupid C compiler question > > I want to start learning C programming. When I go into yast > and sea

Stupid C compiler question

2010-10-22 Thread Mark Pace
I want to start learning C programming. When I go into yast and search for a compiler I see these lines. What is the differnce between these 2? │gcc43│The GNU C Compiler and Support Files │gcc │The system GNU C Compiler -- Mark D Pace Senior Systems Engineer M

Re: zVM updated, VLAN dead

2010-10-22 Thread Sam Bass
Did I notice that the linux definition had layer2=1 and that the Q VSWITCH did not say ETHERNET? Sam Bass -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message:

Re: zVM updated, VLAN dead

2010-10-22 Thread Alan Altmark
On Friday, 10/22/2010 at 11:41 EDT, Mauro Souza wrote: > We granted access to the LNXADM on another vlan (808). Got another IP, from > lnxdb (killed to avoid ip conflict), put the ip on LNXADM, no success. > Changed PORT TYPE to ACCESS, back to VLAN 812, logoff/logon LNXADM, no > success... > Shut

Re: zVM updated, VLAN dead

2010-10-22 Thread Mauro Souza
Hi people, Here are the data: On ZVM610 q vmlan VMLAN maintenance level: Latest Service: VM64604 VMLAN MAC address assignment: MACADDR Prefix: 02 MACIDRANGE SYSTEM: 01-FF USER: 00-00 VMLAN default accounting status: SYSTEM Accounting: OFF USER Ac

Re: zVM updated, VLAN dead

2010-10-22 Thread Harder, Pieter
Just a guess, maybe you don't have VM64604 on your 540 system? And it is probably integrated in 610. That one could change the native vlan without any sound. I was hit by that one when I applied it. Best regards, Pieter Harder pieter.har...@brabantwater.nl tel +31-73-6837133 / +31-6-47272537

Re: zVM updated, VLAN dead

2010-10-22 Thread Bruce Hayden
It would be helpful to have the output of Q CPLEVEL and Q VMLAN from both levels. Maybe 6.1 has a key fix or fixes that you don't have on 5.4, and that why it works differently. On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Mauro Souza wrote: > We granted access to the LNXADM on another vlan (808). Got anot

Re: zVM updated, VLAN dead

2010-10-22 Thread Mauro Souza
We granted access to the LNXADM on another vlan (808). Got another IP, from lnxdb (killed to avoid ip conflict), put the ip on LNXADM, no success. Changed PORT TYPE to ACCESS, back to VLAN 812, logoff/logon LNXADM, no success... Shutdown on zVM, loaded the partition with zvm540, and everything is r

Re: mon_fsstatd - filesystem monitor records

2010-10-22 Thread Scott Rohling
Thanks, Berry and Bruce! The FINIS * * A with the delay looks like the simplest way to get the file closed so I can read it from another user... I'm essentially filtering for the LNXAPPL records for the Linux monitoring records. I'm particularly interested in the mon_fsstatd records, but the oth

Re: zVM updated, VLAN dead

2010-10-22 Thread Bruce Hayden
>Authorized userids: > LNXADM Porttype: Trunk VLAN: 0812 Did you really mean to attach this Linux guest with a virtual trunk port? Or did you really intend to attach it with an access port to vlan 812? If you attach it to a virtual trunk port, you have to load the 802.1q module to ha

Re: the hessling editor and regina rexx

2010-10-22 Thread Richard Troth
The latest release of THE is 3.3. The latest release of Regina is 3.5. As it happens, I built Regina and THE for NORD Linux. These are ready-to-run, not in RPM nor Deb format. They are package hierarchies on CD and they should fly on *any* distro immediately as-is. You can, of course, copy the

Re: zVM updated, VLAN dead

2010-10-22 Thread Mauro Souza
Yes, we copied the PROFILE EXEC from autolog1 to the new zvm, copied our system config definitions, and all other machines have connectivity. The only different setting is VLAN ID, our lnxadm is using vlan 812 and other machines uses vlan 809, 810, etc... Mauro http://mauro.limeiratem.com - regi

Re: the hessling editor and regina rexx

2010-10-22 Thread Mark Pace
>From my SLES11-SP1 sles001:~> rpm -aq the the-3.1-359.1 sles001:~> rpm -qa regina regina-3.4-0.1.44 On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 2:23 AM, Agblad Tore wrote: > I have REXX-Regina_3.4(MT) 5.00 30 Dec 2007 in SLES11 SP1. > Think I had to compile it, but not sure. > It works, but we don't really use it

Re: zVM updated, VLAN dead

2010-10-22 Thread Scott Rohling
Did your SYSTEM CONFIG remain exactly the same? Did you do MODIFY VSWITCH in SYSTEM CONFIG to grant access? Did AUTOLOG1/2 remain exactly the same - did you perhaps issue SET VSWITCH GRANT there? Scott Rohling On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 6:59 AM, Mauro Souza wrote: > Hi Folks! > > I have a very

Re: zVM updated, VLAN dead

2010-10-22 Thread Thang Pham
Did you grant access for LNXADM to the VSWITCH, VADM? You can grant access to the user by logging into MAINT and issuing SET VSWITCH VADM GRANT LNXADM. Thang 2455 South Road (Embedded Pham

2010-10-22 Linux on System z kernel 2.6.36 related updates on developerWorks

2010-10-22 Thread Gerhard Hiller
Please refer to http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/linux390/whatsnew.html for several updates to the 'Development stream': * description of upstream kernel 2.6.36 features that were contributed by Linux on System z development * kernel 2.6.36 patch for kernel message catalog * s390-tool

zVM updated, VLAN dead

2010-10-22 Thread Mauro Souza
Hi Folks! I have a very strange problem on a client here. We had a zVM 5.4 running flawlessly, with vswitch and vlan tagging. Yesterday we updated zVM to 6.1. Even this being a big change, it was the only change we did. We had a gateway machine, lnxadm, with a eth0 coupled to a vswitch (VADM) on V

Re: mon_fsstatd - filesystem monitor records

2010-10-22 Thread Bruce Hayden
You can use 'diskslow' to write the records, but that might not be a good idea for all of the monitor data unless you are only writing the records you want and filtering out the rest. The other thing you should do is set up a delay stage and issue a FINIS every so often (10 secs, 30 secs, whatever

CAVMEN Meeting on Thursday, October 28, 2010

2010-10-22 Thread Chicago Area VM (and Linux) Enthusiasts
The fourth quarter meeting of the Chicago Area VM (and Linux) Enthusiasts will be held on Thursday, October 28, 2010. We are scheduled to meet in room M2 off the cafeteria, it is right next to room M3 where we frequently meet. NOTE: We have a very full agenda for this meeting, and we will be st

Re: mon_fsstatd - filesystem monitor records

2010-10-22 Thread van Sleeuwen, Berry
We use putfiles to write the records, the filename/filetype contains the date and recordID. This is part of a larger pipeline that contains some logic to enable us to comunicatie with the MONWRITE machine. '\ STARMON MONDCSS SHARED',/* connect to MONITOR*/ '| specs 9.8 1.8'