Re: Problems with SCSI-over-FCP after machine upgrade

2015-06-04 Thread Scott Rohling
I should have said you will probably need to use SET EDEV .. CLEAR to delete the last path -- it may even remove them all - but as I've never issued it myself - I'm not sure. When I've messed with things it was to vary off particular paths - not get rid of the whole device. You can DEFINE/DELETE

Re: Problems with SCSI-over-FCP after machine upgrade

2015-06-04 Thread Scott Rohling
Use SET EDEV commands to delete all the paths defined over the FCP subchannels... Then use SET EDEV to define them all back when done.. A simple EXEC to do one or the other or both will save your fingers if you need to do this more then once. Scott Rohling On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 2:07 PM, kwg

Re: Problems with SCSI-over-FCP after machine upgrade

2015-06-04 Thread kwg
There is no zoning. These are all development systems used only by the z/vm and its linux guests. It was a machine upgrade rather than a new machine and the NPIVs for the z/vm systems were preserved. I did check them and I will check again but all the linux systems did start ok initially. The ph

Re: Problems with SCSI-over-FCP after machine upgrade

2015-06-04 Thread David Kreuter
Hi Keith: Check the zoning and the NPIVs. The NPIVs presented to SVC from the BC12 could have changed. David Kreuter Original Message Subject: Problems with SCSI-over-FCP after machine upgrade From: Keith Gooding Date: Thu, June 04, 2015 4:21 pm To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Thi

Problems with SCSI-over-FCP after machine upgrade

2015-06-04 Thread Keith Gooding
This may not be the proper forum but maybe someone can help. We have a small number of linux systems (<32) under z/VM 6.3 which use SCSI connections to LUNs on a SAN Volume Controller via a couple of IBM SAN24B switches (the equivalent of Brocade 300). There are also some systems which use EDEV

Re: LINUX-390 Digest - 2 Jun 2015 to 3 Jun 2015 (#2015-104)

2015-06-04 Thread Rick Troth
On 06/04/2015 11:33 AM, Bonnie C Barthel wrote: > am I supposed to be able to read this? thanks, Bonnie You set your subscription to "digest mode" for the LINUX-390 email list. The list is handled by LISTSERV which can send you a summary. In the summary you got last night, there were 9 messages

Re: LINUX-390 Digest - 2 Jun 2015 to 3 Jun 2015 (#2015-104)

2015-06-04 Thread Bonnie C Barthel
am I supposed to be able to read this? thanks, Bonnie Bonnie Barthel | z/OS Support | IBM Strategic Outsourcing Delivery | 720.396.6755 | pager: cobon...@vtext.com From: LINUX-390 automatic digest system To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Date: 06/03/2015 10:07 PM Subject:LINUX-390

Re: RHEL Install zvm

2015-06-04 Thread Dazzo, Matt
Pete, thank you. Got it. -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Peter Webb, Toronto Transit Commission Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2015 3:36 PM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: RHEL Install zvm Hi Matt, You need to run a CP QUERY

Re: semi-privileged mode

2015-06-04 Thread Rick Troth
On 06/04/2015 08:42 AM, David Boyes wrote: >> > (recall the initial UNIX model had ri= ngs of privileges or was that just >> > Dante and the Seven levels of hell?) > No, that was MULTICS. UNIX V6 and earlier always only had 1 privilege flag > (superuser/general user) due to hardware I/D protectio

semi-privileged mode

2015-06-04 Thread David Boyes
> (recall the initial UNIX model had ri= ngs of privileges or was that just > Dante and the Seven levels of hell?) No, that was MULTICS. UNIX V6 and earlier always only had 1 privilege flag (superuser/general user) due to hardware I/D protection limitations on early model PDPs (pre-11), and we'