on 390 Port [mailto:linux-...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Adam Thornton
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 9:56 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: HiperSocket Performance
On Jan 15, 2009, at 8:40 AM, Rakoczy, Dave wrote:
>
> I've spent the past few days scouring these archives look
zLinux assigns the MTU size according to the IQD CHPID definition.
For sake of discussion lets say I set the CHPID to a Max Frame Size of
64K, that would give me an MTU size of 56K according to the Doc.
Where can I control the size of the packets I'll send across the
interface? In the Tape Blo
Hello all,
We are a longtime zOS shop taking the plunge into the zVM / zLinux
(SUSE 10SP2) world. We had never implemented HiperSockets in our zOS
environment so our experience with this technology is rather limited.
HiperSockets were implemented specifically to support our desire to take
advant
re the same, but in practice, theory
and practice are different."
On 8/29/08 1:51 PM, "Rakoczy, Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> All,
>
> Being a zLinux Newbie I'm following Chapter 7. (installing and
> configuring SLES10) in the 'z/VM and Lin
All,
Being a zLinux Newbie I'm following Chapter 7. (installing and
configuring SLES10) in the 'z/VM and Linux on IBM System z The
Virtualization Cookbook'
Step 7.5.13 identifies modifications to make to the zipl.conf file.
Well... Here's where the problem lies... I fat fingered the parame
Yes... We are in working with our IBM Rep, only problem is our
purchasing department moves nowhere near as quickly as out IT department
would like them too.
Thanks to all who cleared this question up for me.
I have a feeling I'll be back with additional inquiries as time go on.
Thanks again.
We are researching the possibility of putting up a LINUX LPAR on our
z/890 for a Proof of Concept. We currently have 3 general purpose CP's
turned on in the box.
All 3 of the general purpose CP's are available for use to the 3 z/OS
LPAR's we run on the machine, none of the CP's are dedicated. I
