March 02, 2013 11:19 AM
To:
Subject: Re: General Question
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 14:53:29 -0500 (EST), David Boyes wrote:
...
Since there's not very much industry publicity about IBM's offerings
for low cost test infrastructure on Z and P hardware
...
I haven't been following this
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 14:53:29 -0500 (EST), David Boyes wrote:
> ...
> Since there's not very much industry publicity about IBM's offerings
> for low cost test infrastructure on Z and P hardware
> ...
I haven't been following this thread; but if it's software for Linux
for System z, Linux for System
> Have a couple of vendors...that say they support SUSE linux 32 and 64 bit ...
> Intel only ...
> BUT
> Do not support z/Linux ??? puzzled
Yeah. After all, isn't the whole world Intel-based now that those pesky
mainframes are gone?
NOT.
Mostly it's an issue with testing and QA. Since th
tem z, the vendor may not
wish to invest the time and money needed support System z.
> -Original Message-
> From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
> Ron Wells
> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 12:00 PM
> To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subjec
no--not IBM...and yes >> SAS is one of themif it was up to me I would
replace them for WPS...yesterday
From: Mark Post
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date: 02/27/2013 12:31 PM
Subject: Re: General Question
Sent by:Linux on 390 Port
>>> On 2/27/2013 a
>>> On 2/27/2013 at 01:16 PM, Ron Wells wrote:
> Guess confusion IBM - SUSE hand in hand
Are you talking about an IBM product? If not, we have our own team that works
with ISVs to get them to support SLES, on whatever architecture the customer
needs. That doesn't mean we, or us and
Guess confusion IBM - SUSE hand in hand
From: "Gentry, Steve"
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date: 02/27/2013 12:12 PM
Subject: Re: General Question
Sent by:Linux on 390 Port
I don't doubt that since z is a different architecture (in thei
, Steve [mailto:steve.gen...@westernsouthernlife.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 12:11 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: General Question
I don't doubt that since z is a different architecture (in their minds).
There will be some differences between the Linux's but
ilto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Ron Wells
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 12:00 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: General Question
Have a couple of vendors...that say they support SUSE linux 32 and 64
bit ... Intel only ...
BUT
Do not support z/Linux ?
Acker
IBM Smarter Planet, Smarter Data Centers
Virtualization and Enterprise System Management Technologies
From:
Ron Wells
To:
LINUX-390@vm.marist.edu,
Date:
02/27/2013 12:13 PM
Subject:
Re: General Question
Sent by:
Linux on 390 Port
Have a couple of vendors...that say they support SUSE
Have a couple of vendors...that say they support SUSE linux 32 and 64 bit
... Intel only ...
BUT
Do not support z/Linux ??? puzzled
--
Email Disclaimer
This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sende
I use to be in the group that had vdisk and real disk for swap. It just
seemed to make sense. Part of that sense was that I had some old RAMACs
that I could use for DASD swap. But no more. I only have one class of
dasd, DS6800 Ficon attached.
It became apparent, that if I was going to dedicate
y reply e-mail and delete
the e-mail from your system.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Rob van der Heij
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 3:51 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: General question on swap file placement ..
-
On 1/25/07, Adam Thornton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jan 25, 2007, at 3:12 PM, Terry Spaulding wrote:
> We are using SAN storage... soon we will be phasing out ECKD dasd
> for Linux
> zSeries.
I have not seen performance data of a serious z/VM installation doing
paging on SAN disks, but I
On Jan 25, 2007, at 3:12 PM, Terry Spaulding wrote:
We are using SAN storage... soon we will be phasing out ECKD dasd
for Linux
zSeries.
The question is 'best' practice if you do have to utilize a swap
file/partition should it be on dasd/SAN Lun by itself similar to
zOS, zVM,
zVSE or does the m
We are using SAN storage... soon we will be phasing out ECKD dasd for Linux
zSeries.
The question is 'best' practice if you do have to utilize a swap
file/partition should it be on dasd/SAN Lun by itself similar to zOS, zVM,
zVSE or does the majority just place it on the same dasd/SAN Lun volume
w
On 1/25/07, Adam Thornton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd say this is not quite true. Place as much swap as you usually
use on VDISK. Place some more at lower priority on VDISK if you can
spare the VDISK. If you're out of VDISK/are experienceing real
storage constraints, then think about a thi
On Jan 25, 2007, at 1:26 PM, Rob van der Heij wrote:
On 1/25/07, Terry Spaulding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am looking for a best practice when you need a swap file/
partition and
would like to hear from all on what they are doing.
The best swap disk for Linux on z/VM is VDISK, so I don't
ately by reply e-mail
and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation."
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Terry Spaulding
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 10:58 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [LINUX-390] General questi
On 1/25/07, Terry Spaulding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am looking for a best practice when you need a swap file/partition and
would like to hear from all on what they are doing.
The best swap disk for Linux on z/VM is VDISK, so I don't think this
is an issue.
People who use real disk for Lin
I was curious on whether like on zOS, zVM, zVSE best practice of placing
page datasets on low use volumes or give page datasets their own volume is
also done for Linux zSeries by those out there running production instances
where you are running high volume applications, WebSpere, Java based apps,
21 matches
Mail list logo
